Effects of Exercise-Based ACL Injury Prevention Interventions on Knee Motion in Athletes: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.2519/jospt.2024.12720
Di Wang, Anu M Valtonen, Tom Thiel, Lauri Stenroth, Ying Gao, Juha-Pekka Kulmala
{"title":"Effects of Exercise-Based ACL Injury Prevention Interventions on Knee Motion in Athletes: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Di Wang, Anu M Valtonen, Tom Thiel, Lauri Stenroth, Ying Gao, Juha-Pekka Kulmala","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2024.12720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To compare the effectiveness of injury prevention programs (IPPs) for improving high-risk knee motion patterns in the context of reducing the risk of noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury. <b>DESIGN:</b> Systematic review with Bayesian network meta-analysis. <b>DATA SOURCES:</b> PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched until September 10, 2023. <b>ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA:</b> We included randomized controlled trials involving athletes without prior anterior cruciate ligament injury. The trials had to provide data on peak knee flexion and valgus angles, obtained from 2-leg drop vertical jump, single-leg drop vertical jump, or side-step cutting test. <b>RESULTS:</b> The network meta-analysis synthesized data from 22 randomized controlled trials involving 878 participants, evaluating 12 different IPPs. Results of meta-analyses indicated that, in jumping tests, the external focus instructions (mean difference [MD] = 26; credible interval [CrI] = 7.5, 44; surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 0.94) and internal focus of attention (MD = 19; CrI = 0.19, 37; SUCRA = 0.81) was effective for increasing peak knee flexion, and core stability training ranked first for reducing knee valgus (MD = -4.40; CrI = -7.7, -1.1; SUCRA = 0.96). None of the IPPs revealed statistically significant effects for the cutting test. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> The external focus instructions and internal focus of attention increased knee flexion, while core stability exercise reduced knee valgus in jumping tests. Intervention effects were inconsistent for cutting tests. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(2):1-14. Epub 20 December 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12720</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 2","pages":"123-136"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2024.12720","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of injury prevention programs (IPPs) for improving high-risk knee motion patterns in the context of reducing the risk of noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury. DESIGN: Systematic review with Bayesian network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched until September 10, 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials involving athletes without prior anterior cruciate ligament injury. The trials had to provide data on peak knee flexion and valgus angles, obtained from 2-leg drop vertical jump, single-leg drop vertical jump, or side-step cutting test. RESULTS: The network meta-analysis synthesized data from 22 randomized controlled trials involving 878 participants, evaluating 12 different IPPs. Results of meta-analyses indicated that, in jumping tests, the external focus instructions (mean difference [MD] = 26; credible interval [CrI] = 7.5, 44; surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 0.94) and internal focus of attention (MD = 19; CrI = 0.19, 37; SUCRA = 0.81) was effective for increasing peak knee flexion, and core stability training ranked first for reducing knee valgus (MD = -4.40; CrI = -7.7, -1.1; SUCRA = 0.96). None of the IPPs revealed statistically significant effects for the cutting test. CONCLUSION: The external focus instructions and internal focus of attention increased knee flexion, while core stability exercise reduced knee valgus in jumping tests. Intervention effects were inconsistent for cutting tests. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(2):1-14. Epub 20 December 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12720.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于运动的ACL损伤预防干预对运动员膝关节运动的影响:系统回顾和贝叶斯网络meta分析。
目的:比较损伤预防方案(ipp)在降低非接触性前交叉韧带损伤风险的情况下改善高危膝关节运动模式的有效性。设计:采用贝叶斯网络meta分析进行系统评价。数据来源:PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library,以及护理和相关健康文献累积索引,检索截止至2023年9月10日。入选标准:我们纳入了无前交叉韧带损伤运动员的随机对照试验。试验必须提供膝关节屈曲和外翻角度的峰值数据,这些数据来自两腿垂跳、单腿垂跳或侧步切割试验。结果:网络荟萃分析综合了22项随机对照试验的数据,涉及878名受试者,评估了12种不同的ipp。meta分析结果显示,在跳跃测试中,外焦点指令(mean difference [MD] = 26;可信区间[CrI] = 7.5, 44;累积排名曲线下表面[SUCRA] = 0.94)和内部注意焦点(MD = 19;CrI = 0.19, 37;SUCRA = 0.81)对增加膝关节峰值屈曲有效,核心稳定性训练在减少膝关节外翻方面排名第一(MD = -4.40;CrI = -7.7, -1.1;Sucra = 0.96)。所有ipp均未显示出切割试验的统计学显著影响。结论:外焦点训练和内焦点训练增加了膝关节屈曲,而核心稳定性训练减少了跳跃试验中膝关节外翻。切割试验的干预效果不一致。[J] .中华体育杂志,2015;55(2):1-14。2024年12月20日。doi: 10.2519 / jospt.2024.12720。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy® (JOSPT®) publishes scientifically rigorous, clinically relevant content for physical therapists and others in the health care community to advance musculoskeletal and sports-related practice globally. To this end, JOSPT features the latest evidence-based research and clinical cases in musculoskeletal health, injury, and rehabilitation, including physical therapy, orthopaedics, sports medicine, and biomechanics. With an impact factor of 3.090, JOSPT is among the highest ranked physical therapy journals in Clarivate Analytics''s Journal Citation Reports, Science Edition (2017). JOSPT stands eighth of 65 journals in the category of rehabilitation, twelfth of 77 journals in orthopedics, and fourteenth of 81 journals in sport sciences. JOSPT''s 5-year impact factor is 4.061.
期刊最新文献
Self-Reported Hip Crepitus Is Prevalent in Football Players With Hip/Groin Pain, but Is It Associated With Early Hip Osteoarthritis Structural Features? A Longitudinal Study. Addressing Shoulder Weakness in Individuals With Rotator Cuff-Related Shoulder Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis. Could Primary Contact Physical Therapy Improve Emergency Department Care While Being Efficient? A 3-Month Cost-Utility Analysis. Bridging Gaps in Delivering High-Value Treatment for Patellofemoral Pain: A Systematic Evidence and Gap Map of Interventions for Patellofemoral Pain. Bridging the Gap: A Systematic Evidence and Gap Map of Risk Factors and Preventive Strategies for Patellofemoral Pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1