Strength Setbacks: The Impact of Youth Sport-Related Knee Joint Injuries on Thigh Muscle Strength. A 24-Month Prospective Cohort Study.

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.2519/jospt.2024.12663
Justin M Losciale, Christina Y Le, Núria E J Jansen, Leo Lu, Hui Xie, Cameron Mitchell, Michael A Hunt, Jackie L Whittaker
{"title":"Strength Setbacks: The Impact of Youth Sport-Related Knee Joint Injuries on Thigh Muscle Strength. A 24-Month Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Justin M Losciale, Christina Y Le, Núria E J Jansen, Leo Lu, Hui Xie, Cameron Mitchell, Michael A Hunt, Jackie L Whittaker","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2024.12663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To compare injured and uninjured limb knee extensor and flexor peak torque between youth who experienced a sport-related, traumatic knee joint injury and comparable uninjured youth, at baseline (≤4 months of injury) and semiannually for 2 years. Differences by injury type and sex were also explored. <b>DESIGN:</b> Prospective cohort study. <b>METHODS:</b> Bilateral knee extensor and flexor concentric isokinetic peak torque at 90° per second was assessed semiannually in 186 youth (106 injured, 80 controls) for 2 years. Between-group differences in strength over time were estimated with generalized estimating equations (95% confidence interval [CI]). Confounding was controlled using inverse probability weighting. Strength differences between those with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears and those with non-ACL tear injuries as well as between male and female participants were explored. <b>RESULTS:</b> Compared to uninjured controls, injured limb knee extensor strength was lowest at baseline (-37.1 Nm; 95% CI, -45.3 to -28.9) and 6-month follow-up (-13.3 Nm; 95% CI, -20.4 to -6.2), with minimal strength gain beyond the 12-month follow-up (1.7 Nm; 95% CI, -14.3 to 17.6). Knee flexor strength of the injured limb was lowest at baseline (-24.6 Nm; 95% CI, -31.5 to -17.8), and there was minimal strength gain beyond 6 months (2.3 Nm; 95% CI, -7.7 to 12.3). The average residual deficit was similar to the knee extensors (10% to 11%) at 24 months. Exploratory analysis suggested no difference based on injury type or sex. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Injured limb knee extensor and flexor weakness was present after different youth sport-related knee joint injuries. Strength deficits peaked early after injury, improved over time, and plateaued after 12 months, with lingering deficits at 24 months. Thigh muscle strength trajectory was similar across injury types and sex. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(2):1-11. Epub 20 December 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12663</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 2","pages":"137-147"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2024.12663","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare injured and uninjured limb knee extensor and flexor peak torque between youth who experienced a sport-related, traumatic knee joint injury and comparable uninjured youth, at baseline (≤4 months of injury) and semiannually for 2 years. Differences by injury type and sex were also explored. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: Bilateral knee extensor and flexor concentric isokinetic peak torque at 90° per second was assessed semiannually in 186 youth (106 injured, 80 controls) for 2 years. Between-group differences in strength over time were estimated with generalized estimating equations (95% confidence interval [CI]). Confounding was controlled using inverse probability weighting. Strength differences between those with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears and those with non-ACL tear injuries as well as between male and female participants were explored. RESULTS: Compared to uninjured controls, injured limb knee extensor strength was lowest at baseline (-37.1 Nm; 95% CI, -45.3 to -28.9) and 6-month follow-up (-13.3 Nm; 95% CI, -20.4 to -6.2), with minimal strength gain beyond the 12-month follow-up (1.7 Nm; 95% CI, -14.3 to 17.6). Knee flexor strength of the injured limb was lowest at baseline (-24.6 Nm; 95% CI, -31.5 to -17.8), and there was minimal strength gain beyond 6 months (2.3 Nm; 95% CI, -7.7 to 12.3). The average residual deficit was similar to the knee extensors (10% to 11%) at 24 months. Exploratory analysis suggested no difference based on injury type or sex. CONCLUSION: Injured limb knee extensor and flexor weakness was present after different youth sport-related knee joint injuries. Strength deficits peaked early after injury, improved over time, and plateaued after 12 months, with lingering deficits at 24 months. Thigh muscle strength trajectory was similar across injury types and sex. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(2):1-11. Epub 20 December 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12663.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
力量挫折:青少年运动相关膝关节损伤对大腿肌肉力量的影响。一项24个月的前瞻性队列研究。
目的:比较经历过运动相关的外伤性膝关节损伤的青年和可比的未受伤青年在基线(损伤≤4个月)和每半年2年的受伤和未受伤的肢体膝关节伸肌和屈肌峰值扭矩。还探讨了损伤类型和性别的差异。设计:前瞻性队列研究。方法:186名青年(106名受伤,80名对照组)每半年评估一次90°/秒的双侧膝关节伸屈肌同心等速峰值扭矩,持续2年。用广义估计方程(95%置信区间[CI])估计各组间强度随时间的差异。使用逆概率加权控制混杂。研究了前交叉韧带撕裂与非前交叉韧带撕裂的力量差异,以及男女参与者之间的力量差异。结果:与未受伤的对照组相比,受伤肢体膝关节伸肌力量在基线时最低(-37.1 Nm;95% CI, -45.3至-28.9)和6个月随访(-13.3 Nm;95% CI, -20.4至-6.2),12个月随访后强度增加最小(1.7 Nm;95% CI, -14.3至17.6)。受伤肢体的膝屈肌力量在基线时最低(-24.6 Nm;95% CI, -31.5至-17.8),6个月后强度增加最小(2.3 Nm;95% CI, -7.7 ~ 12.3)。在24个月时,平均残余缺损与膝关节伸肌相似(10%至11%)。探索性分析显示损伤类型和性别无差异。结论:不同类型的青少年运动相关膝关节损伤均存在损伤肢体膝关节伸屈肌无力。力量缺陷在受伤后早期达到顶峰,随着时间的推移而改善,并在12个月后趋于平稳,在24个月时仍然存在缺陷。不同类型和性别的大腿肌肉力量轨迹相似。[J] .体育学报,2015;33(2):1-11。2024年12月20日。doi: 10.2519 / jospt.2024.12663。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy® (JOSPT®) publishes scientifically rigorous, clinically relevant content for physical therapists and others in the health care community to advance musculoskeletal and sports-related practice globally. To this end, JOSPT features the latest evidence-based research and clinical cases in musculoskeletal health, injury, and rehabilitation, including physical therapy, orthopaedics, sports medicine, and biomechanics. With an impact factor of 3.090, JOSPT is among the highest ranked physical therapy journals in Clarivate Analytics''s Journal Citation Reports, Science Edition (2017). JOSPT stands eighth of 65 journals in the category of rehabilitation, twelfth of 77 journals in orthopedics, and fourteenth of 81 journals in sport sciences. JOSPT''s 5-year impact factor is 4.061.
期刊最新文献
Barriers and Facilitators for the Implementation of an Osteoarthritis Management Programs in a Low-Income Setting: An Exploratory Study of Malawian Physical Therapists. More Than Fear of Reinjury - A Multidimensional Experience of Reinjury Concerns: A Systematic Review With Qualitative Evidence Synthesis of Athletes' Experience and Interpretation of "Reinjury Concerns" After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury. Comparing Supervised Physical Therapy to Home Exercise Programs in Patients With Distal Radius Fractures: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. The Effectiveness of Patient Education and Self-management Program on Pain and Disability Among Adult Patients With Osteoarthritis: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. Moving Forward Together. Part 2: Enhancing Physical Therapy Clinical Care for Indigenous Peoples' Musculoskeletal Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1