Comparison of AAPM TG282 and Dance breast dosimetry models: Impact on estimates of average MGD for the United Kingdom breast screening programmes

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104908
John Loveland, Alistair Mackenzie
{"title":"Comparison of AAPM TG282 and Dance breast dosimetry models: Impact on estimates of average MGD for the United Kingdom breast screening programmes","authors":"John Loveland,&nbsp;Alistair Mackenzie","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task group 282 (TG282) in collaboration with the European Federation for Organisations of Medical Physics (EFOMP) have developed a novel breast dosimetry model intended as a single international standard.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To explore the impact of TG282 dosimetry on estimates of average Mean Glandular Dose (MGD) in the United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) Breast Screening Programmes (BSP).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>MGDs were estimated, using the TG282 dosimetry model, for the most recent UK NHSBSP dose survey. This dataset included MGDs estimated using the Dance dosimetry model for 439,916 Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) exposures of 111,132 women and 10,831 Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) exposures of 5,113 women. Direct comparisons of the two models were made and differences explored using this large-scale real world dataset.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>TG282 model MGDs were on average approximately 20 % and 15 % lower than Dance model values for FFDM and DBT respectively. For the UK National Diagnostic Reference Level (NDRL) breast thickness range of 50 mm to 60 mm inclusive differences were smaller at approximately 13 % and 10 % respectively. The difference between dosimetry models was shown to depend on the properties of the imaged population and X-ray equipment used. Average differences of up to 63.1 % were observed at higher CBT values for FFDM.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>On average, the TG282 dosimetry model resulted in lower estimates for MGD in UK mammography. The differences were more pronounced for women with larger than average compressed breast thickness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 104908"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179725000183","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task group 282 (TG282) in collaboration with the European Federation for Organisations of Medical Physics (EFOMP) have developed a novel breast dosimetry model intended as a single international standard.

Purpose

To explore the impact of TG282 dosimetry on estimates of average Mean Glandular Dose (MGD) in the United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) Breast Screening Programmes (BSP).

Methods

MGDs were estimated, using the TG282 dosimetry model, for the most recent UK NHSBSP dose survey. This dataset included MGDs estimated using the Dance dosimetry model for 439,916 Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) exposures of 111,132 women and 10,831 Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) exposures of 5,113 women. Direct comparisons of the two models were made and differences explored using this large-scale real world dataset.

Results

TG282 model MGDs were on average approximately 20 % and 15 % lower than Dance model values for FFDM and DBT respectively. For the UK National Diagnostic Reference Level (NDRL) breast thickness range of 50 mm to 60 mm inclusive differences were smaller at approximately 13 % and 10 % respectively. The difference between dosimetry models was shown to depend on the properties of the imaged population and X-ray equipment used. Average differences of up to 63.1 % were observed at higher CBT values for FFDM.

Conclusion

On average, the TG282 dosimetry model resulted in lower estimates for MGD in UK mammography. The differences were more pronounced for women with larger than average compressed breast thickness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AAPM TG282和Dance乳腺剂量模型的比较:对英国乳腺筛查项目平均MGD估计的影响
背景:美国医学物理学家协会(AAPM)第282工作组(TG282)与欧洲医学物理组织联合会(EFOMP)合作,开发了一种新的乳房剂量学模型,拟作为单一的国际标准。目的:探讨TG282剂量学对英国国民健康服务体系(NHS)乳腺筛查项目(BSP)中平均腺体剂量(MGD)估计的影响。方法:使用TG282剂量学模型对最近的英国NHSBSP剂量调查进行MGDs估计。该数据集包括使用Dance剂量学模型对111,132名妇女的439,916次全场数字乳房x线照相术(FFDM)暴露和5,113名妇女的10,831次数字乳房断层摄影(DBT)暴露进行估计的MGDs。使用这个大规模的真实世界数据集对两种模型进行了直接比较,并探讨了差异。结果:TG282模型的MGDs比Dance模型的FFDM和DBT平均分别低约20%和15%。对于英国国家诊断参考水平(NDRL)乳房厚度范围为50毫米至60毫米的差异较小,分别约为13%和10%。剂量学模型之间的差异取决于被成像人群的特性和所使用的x射线设备。在FFDM的高CBT值中,平均差异高达63.1%。结论:平均而言,TG282剂量学模型导致英国乳房x光检查中MGD的估计较低。这种差异在乳房压缩厚度大于平均水平的女性中更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
493
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics: Medical Imaging Radiation Therapy Radiation Protection Measuring Systems and Signal Processing Education and training in Medical Physics Professional issues in Medical Physics.
期刊最新文献
Beyond hype: Adoption and attitudes toward generative AI among Indonesian medical physicists Modelling of dose-escalated proton beam therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer using simulated phantoms Application of alanine and ionization chamber dosimetry with a 3D-printed prostate phantom for quality assurance in high dose rate brachytherapy Quantitative image reconstruction for small-animal SPECT imaging including resolution recovery, scatter correction and attenuation correction Towards polarization-enhanced PET: Study of random background in polarization-correlated Compton events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1