Effect of Nonsurgical Mechanical Debridement With or Without Chlorhexidine Formulations in the Treatment of Peri‐Implant Mucositis. A Randomized Placebo‐Controlled Clinical Trial

IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Clinical Oral Implants Research Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1111/clr.14405
Gaetano Isola, Alessandro Polizzi, Maria Santagati, Angela Alibrandi, Vincenzo Iorio‐Siciliano, Luca Ramaglia
{"title":"Effect of Nonsurgical Mechanical Debridement With or Without Chlorhexidine Formulations in the Treatment of Peri‐Implant Mucositis. A Randomized Placebo‐Controlled Clinical Trial","authors":"Gaetano Isola, Alessandro Polizzi, Maria Santagati, Angela Alibrandi, Vincenzo Iorio‐Siciliano, Luca Ramaglia","doi":"10.1111/clr.14405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesTo evaluate the treatment of peri‐implant mucositis (PM) using a nonsurgical submarginal peri‐implant instrumentation (NSPI) with or without chlorhexidine (CHX) solutions.MethodsFifty‐six patients (28 per group) were randomly assigned to the test (NSPI + 0.12% mouthwash and subgingival CHX irrigation plus tongue brushing with 1% CHX gel) or the control group (NSPI + placebo mouthwash and subgingival placebo irrigation plus tongue brushing with placebo gel). At baseline, 1, 3, 6 months, bleeding on probing (BOP), probing pocket depth (PPD), modified gingival index (mGI), modified plaque index (mPlI), full‐mouth plaque score (FMPS), full‐mouth bleeding score (FMBS), and the proportions of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans</jats:italic></jats:styled-content>, <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>Porphyromonas gingivalis</jats:italic></jats:styled-content>, <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>Tannerella forsythia</jats:italic>,</jats:styled-content> and <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>Treponema denticola</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> were recorded. The BOP reduction was set as a primary outcome. Data were analyzed to assess BOP reduction at a 6‐month follow‐up and to identify significant predictors of implant‐site BOP through mixed generalized linear regression.ResultsAfter 6 months in both groups, a significant reduction of BOP, PD, mPlI, mGI, FMBS, and FMPS was noted (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.05). However, at 6 months, the test group was more effective than the controls in reducing median BOP (∆values control/test: 39.3% [95% CI 37.4–42.3] vs. 48.7 [95% CI 46.5–51.2], <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.044), as well as mPlI (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.041) and the proportion of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>Treponema denticola</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.039). Moreover, the implant‐sites BOP reduction was significantly influenced by test treatment (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001), history of periodontitis (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.003), and a high number of cigarettes/day (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.002), the proportion of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>Porphyromonas gingivalis</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.021) and <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>Tannerella forsythia</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.032).ConclusionsNSPI + CHX showed better results compared to placebo in implant‐sites BOP reduction. The high number of cigarettes/day and the proportion of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>Porphyromonas gingivalis</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> and <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>T. forsythia</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> negatively influenced the BOP reduction in PM‐treated patients.","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14405","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesTo evaluate the treatment of peri‐implant mucositis (PM) using a nonsurgical submarginal peri‐implant instrumentation (NSPI) with or without chlorhexidine (CHX) solutions.MethodsFifty‐six patients (28 per group) were randomly assigned to the test (NSPI + 0.12% mouthwash and subgingival CHX irrigation plus tongue brushing with 1% CHX gel) or the control group (NSPI + placebo mouthwash and subgingival placebo irrigation plus tongue brushing with placebo gel). At baseline, 1, 3, 6 months, bleeding on probing (BOP), probing pocket depth (PPD), modified gingival index (mGI), modified plaque index (mPlI), full‐mouth plaque score (FMPS), full‐mouth bleeding score (FMBS), and the proportions of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, and Treponema denticola were recorded. The BOP reduction was set as a primary outcome. Data were analyzed to assess BOP reduction at a 6‐month follow‐up and to identify significant predictors of implant‐site BOP through mixed generalized linear regression.ResultsAfter 6 months in both groups, a significant reduction of BOP, PD, mPlI, mGI, FMBS, and FMPS was noted (p < 0.05). However, at 6 months, the test group was more effective than the controls in reducing median BOP (∆values control/test: 39.3% [95% CI 37.4–42.3] vs. 48.7 [95% CI 46.5–51.2], p = 0.044), as well as mPlI (p = 0.041) and the proportion of Treponema denticola (p = 0.039). Moreover, the implant‐sites BOP reduction was significantly influenced by test treatment (p < 0.001), history of periodontitis (p = 0.003), and a high number of cigarettes/day (p = 0.002), the proportion of Porphyromonas gingivalis (p = 0.021) and Tannerella forsythia (p = 0.032).ConclusionsNSPI + CHX showed better results compared to placebo in implant‐sites BOP reduction. The high number of cigarettes/day and the proportion of Porphyromonas gingivalis and T. forsythia negatively influenced the BOP reduction in PM‐treated patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Clinical Oral Implants Research 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
11.60%
发文量
149
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Different Socket Morphologies of a Maxillary Central Incisor on the Accuracy of Immediate Implants Placed With Freehand or Guided Surgery—An In Vitro Study Comparison of Two Different Sizes of Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral Particles in Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation With Simultaneous Implant Placement: A Radiographic Study Accuracy of a Novel Robot‐Assisted System and Dynamic Navigation System for Dental Implant Placement: A Clinical Retrospective Study Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Changes Using High-Speed Drilling With Irrigation Versus Low-Speed Drilling Without Irrigation: A Randomized Clinical Trial With 12 Months of Follow-Up. Cover Image
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1