Thanh Thi Minh Le, Ha Thi Thu Trinh, Ha Thanh Pham, Dat Tien Nguyen, Giang Hoang Do, Hien Thuy Phan, Tam Duc Le, Ngoc Tung Quach, Tien Quyet Phi, Ha Hoang Chu
{"title":"Lycopodiaceae herb from Vietnam as a promising medicinal source of natural hupezine and novel huperzine-producing endophytic fungi.","authors":"Thanh Thi Minh Le, Ha Thi Thu Trinh, Ha Thanh Pham, Dat Tien Nguyen, Giang Hoang Do, Hien Thuy Phan, Tam Duc Le, Ngoc Tung Quach, Tien Quyet Phi, Ha Hoang Chu","doi":"10.1007/s10529-025-03562-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(1) To evaluate the potential of producing huperzine (Hup) and anticholinesterase (AChE) activities of nine native Lycopodiaceae species collected in Vietnam; (2) Isolation, identification and characterization of a novel fungus producing both HupA and HupB isolated from Lycopodium casuarinoides Spring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All methanolic extracts of nine plants showed AChE inhibition from 8.55 to 71.81%. Of note, Huperzia serrata (Thunb.) Trevis, L. casuarinoides, Lycopodium clavatum L., Phlegmariurus squarrosus (G. Forst.), and P. phlegmaria (L.) T. Sen & U. Sen were shown to biosynthesize both HupA and HupB by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Plants H. serrata, L. casuarinoides and L. clavatum showed the most potent AchE IC<sub>50</sub> inhibition. HupA and HupB concentrations from six plants were greater than those of previously reported Lycopodiaceae species. Sixty-four endophytic fungi were isolated from tissue of natural L. casuarinoides and then screened for HupA- and HupB-production by HPLC. Out of 64 fungal strains, only TTD2-2.7 extract could produce both HupA and HupB with the yields of 0.034 and 0.028 µg gdcw<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. Moreover, TTD2-2.7 extract also had inhibitory effects on AChE with the IC<sub>50</sub> of 129.76 ± 4.13 µg ml<sup>-1</sup>, which was lower than the extract of host plant L. casuarinoides (94.03 ± 4.13 µg ml<sup>-1</sup>). The fungus was identified as Aspergillus sp. TTD2-2.7 by morphological characteristics and Internal Transcribed Spacer sequence analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These are the first reports of (1) two species L. clavatum and L. casuarinoides producing both HupA and HupB, and (2) L. casuarinoides as novel sources of Hup-producing endophytic fungi as well as (3) fungus Aspergillus as a novel HupA- and HupB-producing endophyte isolated from L. casuarinoides.</p>","PeriodicalId":8929,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology Letters","volume":"47 1","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-025-03562-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: (1) To evaluate the potential of producing huperzine (Hup) and anticholinesterase (AChE) activities of nine native Lycopodiaceae species collected in Vietnam; (2) Isolation, identification and characterization of a novel fungus producing both HupA and HupB isolated from Lycopodium casuarinoides Spring.
Results: All methanolic extracts of nine plants showed AChE inhibition from 8.55 to 71.81%. Of note, Huperzia serrata (Thunb.) Trevis, L. casuarinoides, Lycopodium clavatum L., Phlegmariurus squarrosus (G. Forst.), and P. phlegmaria (L.) T. Sen & U. Sen were shown to biosynthesize both HupA and HupB by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Plants H. serrata, L. casuarinoides and L. clavatum showed the most potent AchE IC50 inhibition. HupA and HupB concentrations from six plants were greater than those of previously reported Lycopodiaceae species. Sixty-four endophytic fungi were isolated from tissue of natural L. casuarinoides and then screened for HupA- and HupB-production by HPLC. Out of 64 fungal strains, only TTD2-2.7 extract could produce both HupA and HupB with the yields of 0.034 and 0.028 µg gdcw-1, respectively. Moreover, TTD2-2.7 extract also had inhibitory effects on AChE with the IC50 of 129.76 ± 4.13 µg ml-1, which was lower than the extract of host plant L. casuarinoides (94.03 ± 4.13 µg ml-1). The fungus was identified as Aspergillus sp. TTD2-2.7 by morphological characteristics and Internal Transcribed Spacer sequence analysis.
Conclusions: These are the first reports of (1) two species L. clavatum and L. casuarinoides producing both HupA and HupB, and (2) L. casuarinoides as novel sources of Hup-producing endophytic fungi as well as (3) fungus Aspergillus as a novel HupA- and HupB-producing endophyte isolated from L. casuarinoides.
期刊介绍:
Biotechnology Letters is the world’s leading rapid-publication primary journal dedicated to biotechnology as a whole – that is to topics relating to actual or potential applications of biological reactions affected by microbial, plant or animal cells and biocatalysts derived from them.
All relevant aspects of molecular biology, genetics and cell biochemistry, of process and reactor design, of pre- and post-treatment steps, and of manufacturing or service operations are therefore included.
Contributions from industrial and academic laboratories are equally welcome. We also welcome contributions covering biotechnological aspects of regenerative medicine and biomaterials and also cancer biotechnology. Criteria for the acceptance of papers relate to our aim of publishing useful and informative results that will be of value to other workers in related fields.
The emphasis is very much on novelty and immediacy in order to justify rapid publication of authors’ results. It should be noted, however, that we do not normally publish papers (but this is not absolute) that deal with unidentified consortia of microorganisms (e.g. as in activated sludge) as these results may not be easily reproducible in other laboratories.
Papers describing the isolation and identification of microorganisms are not regarded as appropriate but such information can be appended as supporting information to a paper. Papers dealing with simple process development are usually considered to lack sufficient novelty or interest to warrant publication.