Parental perception of treatment options for mucopolysaccharidosis: a survey to bridge the gap for personalized medicine.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1186/s13023-025-03549-y
Anna-Maria Wiesinger, Florian B Lagler
{"title":"Parental perception of treatment options for mucopolysaccharidosis: a survey to bridge the gap for personalized medicine.","authors":"Anna-Maria Wiesinger, Florian B Lagler","doi":"10.1186/s13023-025-03549-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) are a group of lysosomal storage diseases with substantial unmet medical needs-for both patients and caregivers. Approved therapies are limited, and the perception of investigative ones remains enigmatic.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using an innovative survey concept based on the discrete choice experiment method (DEC) with neuronopathic and non-neuronopathic patient scenarios, we aimed to evaluate how parents of children with MPS perceive different approved and innovative therapies. The questionnaire was distributed via patient organizations in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most likely parents would choose an approach to repurposed treatments for their child (neuronopathic: 82%, 14/17 and non-neuronopathic: 94%, 16/17), followed by enzyme replacement therapy (ERT, both 88%, 15/17), hematopoietic stem cell therapy (HSCT, 70%, 12/17 and 76%, 13/17), and finally gene therapy (GT, 58%, 10/17 and 53%, 9/17). The general attitudes strongly influenced decision-making regarding treatment options. While over 80% of respondents who held a positive attitude toward ERT, HSCT, and ITTs indicated they would opt for these therapies in both neuronopathic and non-neuronopathic cases, only about half of the parents with a favorable general view of gene therapy (GT) expressed a positive perception of its likelihood as a treatment option. Furthermore, most parents found mild infections, injection site reactions (ISRs), hypertonia, and treatment-related hospitalizations acceptable and indicated patient organizations as their main source of information.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides an innovative survey method, thereby offering the rationale for a quantitative risk-benefit model and the importance of patient and caregiver-centered information dissemination, especially for innovative therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19651,"journal":{"name":"Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases","volume":"20 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11762465/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-025-03549-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) are a group of lysosomal storage diseases with substantial unmet medical needs-for both patients and caregivers. Approved therapies are limited, and the perception of investigative ones remains enigmatic.

Method: Using an innovative survey concept based on the discrete choice experiment method (DEC) with neuronopathic and non-neuronopathic patient scenarios, we aimed to evaluate how parents of children with MPS perceive different approved and innovative therapies. The questionnaire was distributed via patient organizations in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria.

Results: Most likely parents would choose an approach to repurposed treatments for their child (neuronopathic: 82%, 14/17 and non-neuronopathic: 94%, 16/17), followed by enzyme replacement therapy (ERT, both 88%, 15/17), hematopoietic stem cell therapy (HSCT, 70%, 12/17 and 76%, 13/17), and finally gene therapy (GT, 58%, 10/17 and 53%, 9/17). The general attitudes strongly influenced decision-making regarding treatment options. While over 80% of respondents who held a positive attitude toward ERT, HSCT, and ITTs indicated they would opt for these therapies in both neuronopathic and non-neuronopathic cases, only about half of the parents with a favorable general view of gene therapy (GT) expressed a positive perception of its likelihood as a treatment option. Furthermore, most parents found mild infections, injection site reactions (ISRs), hypertonia, and treatment-related hospitalizations acceptable and indicated patient organizations as their main source of information.

Conclusions: This study provides an innovative survey method, thereby offering the rationale for a quantitative risk-benefit model and the importance of patient and caregiver-centered information dissemination, especially for innovative therapies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
父母对粘多糖病治疗方案的看法:一项旨在弥合个性化医疗差距的调查。
背景:粘多糖病(MPS)是一组溶酶体贮积性疾病,对患者和护理人员都有大量未满足的医疗需求。批准的治疗方法是有限的,而对研究性治疗的看法仍然是谜。方法:采用基于离散选择实验法(DEC)的创新调查概念,针对神经病变和非神经病变患者情况,评估MPS患儿家长对不同已批准和创新治疗方法的看法。问卷通过德国、瑞士和奥地利的患者组织分发。结果:大多数父母会为他们的孩子选择一种新的治疗方法(神经性:82%,14/17;非神经性:94%,16/17),其次是酶替代治疗(ERT,均为88%,15/17),造血干细胞治疗(HSCT, 70%, 12/17和76%,13/17),最后是基因治疗(GT, 58%, 10/17和53%,9/17)。一般的态度强烈地影响了有关治疗方案的决策。虽然超过80%对ERT、HSCT和ITTs持积极态度的受访者表示,他们会在神经病变和非神经病变病例中选择这些治疗方法,但只有大约一半对基因治疗(GT)持良好总体看法的父母对其作为治疗选择的可能性表示积极看法。此外,大多数家长发现轻度感染、注射部位反应(ISRs)、高渗和治疗相关的住院治疗是可以接受的,并指出患者组织是他们的主要信息来源。结论:本研究提供了一种创新的调查方法,从而为定量风险-收益模型和以患者和护理者为中心的信息传播的重要性提供了理论基础,特别是对于创新疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
418
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that encompasses all aspects of rare diseases and orphan drugs. The journal publishes high-quality reviews on specific rare diseases. In addition, the journal may consider articles on clinical trial outcome reports, either positive or negative, and articles on public health issues in the field of rare diseases and orphan drugs. The journal does not accept case reports.
期刊最新文献
Malignant Hyperthermia in Slavonic cohort - clinical and genetic findings beyond standard diagnostics. Coding systems and monitoring practices across the ERN ReCONNET: insights from a comprehensive survey and unmet needs. SGK3 promoter deletion in late-onset hypophosphatemic rickets, a possible genetic cause of the disease. Persistent glutamate increase in TANGO2 deficiency with normalization after vitamin supplementation: first documentation by MR spectroscopy. Outcomes of GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy in adults with sickle cell disease and type 2 diabetes: a real-world cohort analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1