A longitudinal blended learning curriculum for bedside ultrasound education in pulmonary and critical care fellowship.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1186/s12909-024-06584-8
Harry Kuperstein, Kunal Gada, Werda Alam, Sahar Ahmad
{"title":"A longitudinal blended learning curriculum for bedside ultrasound education in pulmonary and critical care fellowship.","authors":"Harry Kuperstein, Kunal Gada, Werda Alam, Sahar Ahmad","doi":"10.1186/s12909-024-06584-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There exists no standardized longitudinal curriculum for teaching bedside ultrasonography (US) in Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (PCCM) fellowship programs. Given the importance of mastering bedside US in clinical practice, we developed an integrated year-long US curriculum for first-year PCCM fellows.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>11 first-year PCCM fellows completed the entire seven-step Blended Learning Curriculum. We provide results from an evaluation of Step I, the initial training course. Evaluation included a 17-question multiple-choice knowledge test and a hands-on skill exam delivered pre-, immediately post-, and 6 months post-course. Performance on these same evaluation measures was compared between learners who completed a traditionally designed curriculum, which contained a formal in-person didactic course, and learners who completed a blended learning curriculum covering the same learning objectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All learners showed a significant improvement immediately after the course in both knowledge (p = 0.007) and skills (p = 0.004) with adequate retention of both knowledge and skills after 6 months. Scores on a multiple-choice knowledge test increased from a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 24% (15-41%) pre-course to a median of 71% (59-82%) post-course, while scores on a hands-on skill exam increased from a median of 16% (7-45%) pre-course to a median of 87% (74-94%) post-course. There was no difference in learning or retention between those who learned via the blended learning model as compared with a more traditional model. Learners agreed the course was well-designed, with relevant learning topics, sufficient time to learn, and fair evaluation modalities. The blended learning model required 15 fewer faculty-hours than the traditional learning model.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A blended learning model for bedside US education implemented at a single PCCM fellowship performs comparably to a traditional model for both acquisition and retention of knowledge and skills. The incorporation of asynchronous learning mitigates the barrier of insufficient time and quantity of US skilled teaching faculty that many PCCM fellowships face and provides flexibility to both instructors and learners.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"123"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11762126/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06584-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There exists no standardized longitudinal curriculum for teaching bedside ultrasonography (US) in Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (PCCM) fellowship programs. Given the importance of mastering bedside US in clinical practice, we developed an integrated year-long US curriculum for first-year PCCM fellows.

Methods: 11 first-year PCCM fellows completed the entire seven-step Blended Learning Curriculum. We provide results from an evaluation of Step I, the initial training course. Evaluation included a 17-question multiple-choice knowledge test and a hands-on skill exam delivered pre-, immediately post-, and 6 months post-course. Performance on these same evaluation measures was compared between learners who completed a traditionally designed curriculum, which contained a formal in-person didactic course, and learners who completed a blended learning curriculum covering the same learning objectives.

Results: All learners showed a significant improvement immediately after the course in both knowledge (p = 0.007) and skills (p = 0.004) with adequate retention of both knowledge and skills after 6 months. Scores on a multiple-choice knowledge test increased from a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 24% (15-41%) pre-course to a median of 71% (59-82%) post-course, while scores on a hands-on skill exam increased from a median of 16% (7-45%) pre-course to a median of 87% (74-94%) post-course. There was no difference in learning or retention between those who learned via the blended learning model as compared with a more traditional model. Learners agreed the course was well-designed, with relevant learning topics, sufficient time to learn, and fair evaluation modalities. The blended learning model required 15 fewer faculty-hours than the traditional learning model.

Discussion: A blended learning model for bedside US education implemented at a single PCCM fellowship performs comparably to a traditional model for both acquisition and retention of knowledge and skills. The incorporation of asynchronous learning mitigates the barrier of insufficient time and quantity of US skilled teaching faculty that many PCCM fellowships face and provides flexibility to both instructors and learners.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个纵向混合学习课程的床边超声教育在肺和危重病护理奖学金。
背景:在肺与危重医学(PCCM)奖学金项目中,床边超声(US)的教学没有标准化的纵向课程。鉴于在临床实践中掌握床边美国的重要性,我们为PCCM第一年的研究员开发了一个为期一年的综合美国课程。方法:11名第一年的PCCM研究员完成了整个七步混合学习课程。我们提供对第一步(初始培训课程)的评估结果。评估包括17道选择题知识测试和实践技能测试,分别在课程开始前、结束后和结束后6个月进行。在这些相同的评估措施中,完成传统设计课程的学习者(其中包含正式的面对面教学课程)和完成涵盖相同学习目标的混合学习课程的学习者之间的表现进行了比较。结果:所有学习者在课程结束后立即在知识(p = 0.007)和技能(p = 0.004)方面都有显著提高,6个月后知识和技能都有足够的保留。多项选择知识测试的分数从课程前24%(15-41%)的中位数(四分位数区间[IQR])上升到课程后71%(59-82%)的中位数,而实践技能考试的分数从课程前16%(7-45%)的中位数上升到课程后87%(74-94%)的中位数。与传统学习模式相比,通过混合学习模式学习的学生在学习或记忆方面没有差异。学员们一致认为课程设计良好,有相关的学习主题,充足的学习时间和公平的评估方式。混合学习模式比传统学习模式所需的教学时数减少了15个小时。讨论:在单个PCCM奖学金中实施的床边美国教育的混合学习模式在知识和技能的获取和保留方面与传统模式相当。异步学习的结合缓解了许多PCCM奖学金面临的时间和数量不足的美国熟练教师的障碍,并为教师和学习者提供了灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of a Novel 3D-printed mold-based silicone model for laparoscopic duodenal stump reinforcement suture simulation training. Effectiveness and retention of extremity and junctional tourniquet training among medical interns. An integrated clinical-research training model for professional master's degree postgraduate medical students: a controlled educational study. Development and evaluation of a blended learning model integrating ARCS and BOPPPS for Endodontics education. Evaluation of a program to increase nurses' motivation for psychiatric visiting care: a pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1