A longitudinal blended learning curriculum for bedside ultrasound education in pulmonary and critical care fellowship.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1186/s12909-024-06584-8
Harry Kuperstein, Kunal Gada, Werda Alam, Sahar Ahmad
{"title":"A longitudinal blended learning curriculum for bedside ultrasound education in pulmonary and critical care fellowship.","authors":"Harry Kuperstein, Kunal Gada, Werda Alam, Sahar Ahmad","doi":"10.1186/s12909-024-06584-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There exists no standardized longitudinal curriculum for teaching bedside ultrasonography (US) in Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (PCCM) fellowship programs. Given the importance of mastering bedside US in clinical practice, we developed an integrated year-long US curriculum for first-year PCCM fellows.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>11 first-year PCCM fellows completed the entire seven-step Blended Learning Curriculum. We provide results from an evaluation of Step I, the initial training course. Evaluation included a 17-question multiple-choice knowledge test and a hands-on skill exam delivered pre-, immediately post-, and 6 months post-course. Performance on these same evaluation measures was compared between learners who completed a traditionally designed curriculum, which contained a formal in-person didactic course, and learners who completed a blended learning curriculum covering the same learning objectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All learners showed a significant improvement immediately after the course in both knowledge (p = 0.007) and skills (p = 0.004) with adequate retention of both knowledge and skills after 6 months. Scores on a multiple-choice knowledge test increased from a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 24% (15-41%) pre-course to a median of 71% (59-82%) post-course, while scores on a hands-on skill exam increased from a median of 16% (7-45%) pre-course to a median of 87% (74-94%) post-course. There was no difference in learning or retention between those who learned via the blended learning model as compared with a more traditional model. Learners agreed the course was well-designed, with relevant learning topics, sufficient time to learn, and fair evaluation modalities. The blended learning model required 15 fewer faculty-hours than the traditional learning model.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A blended learning model for bedside US education implemented at a single PCCM fellowship performs comparably to a traditional model for both acquisition and retention of knowledge and skills. The incorporation of asynchronous learning mitigates the barrier of insufficient time and quantity of US skilled teaching faculty that many PCCM fellowships face and provides flexibility to both instructors and learners.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11762126/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06584-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There exists no standardized longitudinal curriculum for teaching bedside ultrasonography (US) in Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (PCCM) fellowship programs. Given the importance of mastering bedside US in clinical practice, we developed an integrated year-long US curriculum for first-year PCCM fellows.

Methods: 11 first-year PCCM fellows completed the entire seven-step Blended Learning Curriculum. We provide results from an evaluation of Step I, the initial training course. Evaluation included a 17-question multiple-choice knowledge test and a hands-on skill exam delivered pre-, immediately post-, and 6 months post-course. Performance on these same evaluation measures was compared between learners who completed a traditionally designed curriculum, which contained a formal in-person didactic course, and learners who completed a blended learning curriculum covering the same learning objectives.

Results: All learners showed a significant improvement immediately after the course in both knowledge (p = 0.007) and skills (p = 0.004) with adequate retention of both knowledge and skills after 6 months. Scores on a multiple-choice knowledge test increased from a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 24% (15-41%) pre-course to a median of 71% (59-82%) post-course, while scores on a hands-on skill exam increased from a median of 16% (7-45%) pre-course to a median of 87% (74-94%) post-course. There was no difference in learning or retention between those who learned via the blended learning model as compared with a more traditional model. Learners agreed the course was well-designed, with relevant learning topics, sufficient time to learn, and fair evaluation modalities. The blended learning model required 15 fewer faculty-hours than the traditional learning model.

Discussion: A blended learning model for bedside US education implemented at a single PCCM fellowship performs comparably to a traditional model for both acquisition and retention of knowledge and skills. The incorporation of asynchronous learning mitigates the barrier of insufficient time and quantity of US skilled teaching faculty that many PCCM fellowships face and provides flexibility to both instructors and learners.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of deliberate practices versus conventional lecture in trauma training for medical students. Outcome-based simulation training for ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement: clinical impact on preventing mechanical complications. Assessing the role of medical entomology in general medicine education in Iran: expert perspectives and curriculum implications. Brain drain in Emergency Medicine in Lebanon, building locally and exporting globally. Development and validation of a tool to measure telehealth educational environment (THEEM).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1