Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Based Vertebral Bone Quality Scores in Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY World neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123712
Yao Gao , Guofu Zhang , Xiaomei Tian , Minguang Zhang
{"title":"Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Based Vertebral Bone Quality Scores in Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis","authors":"Yao Gao ,&nbsp;Guofu Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaomei Tian ,&nbsp;Minguang Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) often causes various issues such as neural symptoms and osteoporosis (OP). Vertebral bone quality (VBQ) is a crucial factor that surgeons take into consider prior to surgery. However, little attention has been given to the use of VBQ in evaluating vertebral bone mass in DLS patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of magnetic resonance imaging–based VBQ score to evaluate bone mass in patients with DLS and its ability to predict OP.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 120 patients were enrolled and divided into the DLS and non-DLS groups. The VBQ scores of the L1–L4 vertebral bodies were measured in noncontrast T1-weighted imaging. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used to assess osteoporotic status. Additionally, patients with DLS were divided into 2 groups: with vertebral rotatory subluxation (VRS) and without VRS. The VBQ scores, computed tomography (CT) values, and DXA indicators were compared between the DLS and non-DLS groups, and between VRS and non-VRS groups. VBQ was compared with the CT value, bone density, and T-score using the Pearson correlation coefficient. VBQ was obtained according to the non-DLS group and compared with the accuracy of diagnosing OP with DXA.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The DLS group was significantly different from the non-DLS group in terms of the VBQ score (3.53 vs. 2.98), CT value (109.81 vs. 134.60), T score (−1.19 vs. −1.72), and bone mineral density value (1.04 vs. 0.94). The VRS group presented a larger Cobb angle, lower CT value, and higher VBQ score. The area under the curve of the VBQ score in the prediction of OP was 0.804, with a sensitivity of 68.4% and a specificity of 85.7%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>VBQ can reduce interference from degeneration and deformities and can be used as a complementary method for vertebral quality assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 123712"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875025000683","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) often causes various issues such as neural symptoms and osteoporosis (OP). Vertebral bone quality (VBQ) is a crucial factor that surgeons take into consider prior to surgery. However, little attention has been given to the use of VBQ in evaluating vertebral bone mass in DLS patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of magnetic resonance imaging–based VBQ score to evaluate bone mass in patients with DLS and its ability to predict OP.

Methods

A total of 120 patients were enrolled and divided into the DLS and non-DLS groups. The VBQ scores of the L1–L4 vertebral bodies were measured in noncontrast T1-weighted imaging. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used to assess osteoporotic status. Additionally, patients with DLS were divided into 2 groups: with vertebral rotatory subluxation (VRS) and without VRS. The VBQ scores, computed tomography (CT) values, and DXA indicators were compared between the DLS and non-DLS groups, and between VRS and non-VRS groups. VBQ was compared with the CT value, bone density, and T-score using the Pearson correlation coefficient. VBQ was obtained according to the non-DLS group and compared with the accuracy of diagnosing OP with DXA.

Results

The DLS group was significantly different from the non-DLS group in terms of the VBQ score (3.53 vs. 2.98), CT value (109.81 vs. 134.60), T score (−1.19 vs. −1.72), and bone mineral density value (1.04 vs. 0.94). The VRS group presented a larger Cobb angle, lower CT value, and higher VBQ score. The area under the curve of the VBQ score in the prediction of OP was 0.804, with a sensitivity of 68.4% and a specificity of 85.7%.

Conclusions

VBQ can reduce interference from degeneration and deformities and can be used as a complementary method for vertebral quality assessment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
退行性腰椎侧凸患者mri椎体骨质量(VBQ)评分分析。
导言:退行性腰椎侧凸(DLS)常引起神经症状和骨质疏松症(OP)等各种问题。椎体骨质量(VBQ)是外科医生在手术前考虑的一个关键因素。然而,很少有人注意使用VBQ来评估DLS患者的椎体骨量。本研究的目的是探讨基于mri的VBQ评分评估DLS患者骨量的能力及其对手术的预测能力。方法:共入组130例患者,分为DLS组和非DLS组。在非对比T1WI上测量L1-L4椎体的VBQ评分。采用双x线吸收仪(DXA)评估骨质疏松状况。此外,将DLS患者分为两组:有椎体旋转半脱位(VRS)和无VRS。比较DLS组与非DLS组、VRS组与非VRS组的VBQ评分、CT值、DXA指标。采用Pearson相关系数将VBQ与CT值、骨密度和t评分进行比较。根据非dls组计算VBQ,并与DXA诊断骨质疏松的准确性进行比较。结果:DLS组与非DLS组在VBQ评分(3.53 vs. 2.98)、CT值(109.81 vs. 134.60)、T评分(-1.19 vs. -1.72)、骨密度(BMD)值(1.04 vs. 0.94)方面差异有统计学意义。VRS组Cobb角较大,CT值较低,VBQ评分较高。VBQ评分预测骨质疏松的AUC为0.804,敏感性为68.4%,特异性为85.7%。结论:VBQ可减少退变和畸形对椎体质量的干扰,可作为椎体质量评价的补充方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic Trans-Costovertebral Approach to Thoracic Discectomy for Central Calcified Disc Herniations: A Technical Note Measurement of Resource Utilization in Spine Healthcare for Elective Spine Surgery Patients: A Systematic Review A Protocol to Preserve the Dural Safety Margin During Simultaneous Hybrid Lumbar Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy and Cervical Laminoplasty Resection of the Clinoidal Meningioma Encasing the Carotid Artery: A Complex and Delicate Surgical Procedure Relationship Between Social Media and Healthgrades Ratings for Spine Neurosurgeons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1