[Nationwide evaluation of medical training in psychiatry and psychotherapy in Germany].

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Nervenarzt Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1007/s00115-024-01796-1
Nina Schubotz, Julia-Maleen Kronsbein, Angela Zapp, Rebecca Reichel
{"title":"[Nationwide evaluation of medical training in psychiatry and psychotherapy in Germany].","authors":"Nina Schubotz, Julia-Maleen Kronsbein, Angela Zapp, Rebecca Reichel","doi":"10.1007/s00115-024-01796-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To date there has been no evaluation of further training and working conditions in medical specialist training in psychiatry and psychotherapy in Germany. In order to counteract the lack of young talent and ensure long-term care for patients, quality assurance is essential.</p><p><strong>Aim of the work: </strong>The evaluation aims to identify strengths and weaknesses of the further training and to derive measures for improvement. For a better classification, a comparison is also made with other disciplines with medical specialist further training.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The online-based survey took place from 15 May 2023 to 30 June 2023. The results refer to 315 questionnaires from 202 physicians in further training and 113 medical specialists (specialist title for less than 3 years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of those surveyed 64% were satisfied with the quality and implementation of the general psychiatry part, only 11% were considering changing their specialty and 18% were considering moving their job abroad due to the training conditions. There is a need for improvement in induction and in the organization of the training. In addition, significant time and financial burdens for mandatory external training events as well as the lack of compatibility between training and research, teaching and care work responsibilities were criticized.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Overall, it appears that the working conditions are better than in other disciplines. With respect to the potential for improvement, the creation of financing for further training is essential; certificates for high quality training and the publication of positive examples can also contribute to quality assurance and improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":49770,"journal":{"name":"Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nervenarzt","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-024-01796-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To date there has been no evaluation of further training and working conditions in medical specialist training in psychiatry and psychotherapy in Germany. In order to counteract the lack of young talent and ensure long-term care for patients, quality assurance is essential.

Aim of the work: The evaluation aims to identify strengths and weaknesses of the further training and to derive measures for improvement. For a better classification, a comparison is also made with other disciplines with medical specialist further training.

Material and methods: The online-based survey took place from 15 May 2023 to 30 June 2023. The results refer to 315 questionnaires from 202 physicians in further training and 113 medical specialists (specialist title for less than 3 years).

Results: Of those surveyed 64% were satisfied with the quality and implementation of the general psychiatry part, only 11% were considering changing their specialty and 18% were considering moving their job abroad due to the training conditions. There is a need for improvement in induction and in the organization of the training. In addition, significant time and financial burdens for mandatory external training events as well as the lack of compatibility between training and research, teaching and care work responsibilities were criticized.

Discussion: Overall, it appears that the working conditions are better than in other disciplines. With respect to the potential for improvement, the creation of financing for further training is essential; certificates for high quality training and the publication of positive examples can also contribute to quality assurance and improvement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nervenarzt
Nervenarzt 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Nervenarzt is an internationally recognized journal addressing neurologists and psychiatrists working in clinical or practical environments. Essential findings and current information from neurology, psychiatry as well as neuropathology, neurosurgery up to psychotherapy are presented. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of neurology and psychiatry. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
期刊最新文献
[Interplay between depression and sexuality]. [Nationwide evaluation of medical training in psychiatry and psychotherapy in Germany]. [Brain sagging dementia-A rare potentially reversible cause of dementia]. [Compatibility of care work and specialist training in psychiatry : Position paper of the generation PSY-Next generation initiative of the German Association for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy]. [Mechanisms of action of antidepressive pharmacotherapy: brain and mind-body and environment].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1