Sex and race disparities in emergency department patients with chest pain and a detectable or mildly elevated troponin.

IF 1.3 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100495
Lucas M Boyer, Anna C Snavely, Jason P Stopyra, Subha V Raman, Jeffrey M Caterino, Carol L Clark, Alan E Jones, Michael E Hall, Carolyn J Park, Brian C Hiestand, Sujethra Vasu, Michael A Kutcher, W Gregory Hundley, Simon A Mahler, Chadwick D Miller
{"title":"Sex and race disparities in emergency department patients with chest pain and a detectable or mildly elevated troponin.","authors":"Lucas M Boyer, Anna C Snavely, Jason P Stopyra, Subha V Raman, Jeffrey M Caterino, Carol L Clark, Alan E Jones, Michael E Hall, Carolyn J Park, Brian C Hiestand, Sujethra Vasu, Michael A Kutcher, W Gregory Hundley, Simon A Mahler, Chadwick D Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying and eliminating health disparities is a public health priority. The goal of this analysis is to determine whether cardiac testing or outcome disparities exist by race or sex in patients with detectable to mildly elevated serum troponin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of the CMR-IMPACT trial that randomized patients with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome and a detectable or mildly elevated troponin measure from 4 US hospitals to an early invasive angiography or cardiac MRI strategy. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, cardiac hospital readmission, and repeat cardiac ED. Secondary outcomes were components of the composite and revascularization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i> = 312, mean age 61 ± 11 years) were 36.2 % non-white and 40.1 % female. The composite outcome occurred in 63.7 % of non-white vs. 49.8 % of white patients (aHR 1.50, 95 % CI 1.08-2.09) and 53.6 % of female vs. 55.6 % of male patients (aHR 0.93, 95 % CI 0.68-1.28). Non-white (aHR 0.57, 95 % CI 0.35-0.92) patients had lower rates of revascularization also less median stenosis (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and stenosis >70 % (p < 0.001) during index cardiac testing. Despite these findings, ACS after discharge was higher among non-white patients (aHR 1.84, 95 % CI 1.11-3.05). Females had lower rates of revascularization (aHR 0.52, 95 % CI 0.33-0.82), but no increase in ACS after discharge (aHR 0.90, 95 % CI 0.55-1.49).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Non-white patients had higher rates of ACS following discharge despite lower rates of obstructive CAD following standardization of index cardiac testing. Future disparity works should explore care following the index encounter.</p>","PeriodicalId":72158,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","volume":"49 ","pages":"100495"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11764845/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Identifying and eliminating health disparities is a public health priority. The goal of this analysis is to determine whether cardiac testing or outcome disparities exist by race or sex in patients with detectable to mildly elevated serum troponin.

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of the CMR-IMPACT trial that randomized patients with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome and a detectable or mildly elevated troponin measure from 4 US hospitals to an early invasive angiography or cardiac MRI strategy. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, cardiac hospital readmission, and repeat cardiac ED. Secondary outcomes were components of the composite and revascularization.

Results: Participants (n = 312, mean age 61 ± 11 years) were 36.2 % non-white and 40.1 % female. The composite outcome occurred in 63.7 % of non-white vs. 49.8 % of white patients (aHR 1.50, 95 % CI 1.08-2.09) and 53.6 % of female vs. 55.6 % of male patients (aHR 0.93, 95 % CI 0.68-1.28). Non-white (aHR 0.57, 95 % CI 0.35-0.92) patients had lower rates of revascularization also less median stenosis (p < 0.001) and stenosis >70 % (p < 0.001) during index cardiac testing. Despite these findings, ACS after discharge was higher among non-white patients (aHR 1.84, 95 % CI 1.11-3.05). Females had lower rates of revascularization (aHR 0.52, 95 % CI 0.33-0.82), but no increase in ACS after discharge (aHR 0.90, 95 % CI 0.55-1.49).

Conclusion: Non-white patients had higher rates of ACS following discharge despite lower rates of obstructive CAD following standardization of index cardiac testing. Future disparity works should explore care following the index encounter.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
59 days
期刊最新文献
The design and rationale of the cardiac REHABilitation to improve metabolic health in Hypertrophic CardioMyopathy (REHAB-HCM) Study. Underlying and contributing causes of mortality from CDC WONDER-Insights for researchers. Sex and race disparities in emergency department patients with chest pain and a detectable or mildly elevated troponin. Cathepsin-D and outcomes in peripartum cardiomyopathy: Results from IPAC. Leveraging the postpartum period to reduce racial disparities in postpartum hypertension care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1