Oculomotor challenges in macular degeneration impact motion extrapolation.

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Vision Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1167/jov.25.1.17
Jason F Rubinstein, Noelia Gabriela Alcalde, Adrien Chopin, Preeti Verghese
{"title":"Oculomotor challenges in macular degeneration impact motion extrapolation.","authors":"Jason F Rubinstein, Noelia Gabriela Alcalde, Adrien Chopin, Preeti Verghese","doi":"10.1167/jov.25.1.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Macular degeneration (MD), which affects the central visual field including the fovea, has a profound impact on acuity and oculomotor control. We used a motion extrapolation task to investigate the contribution of various factors that potentially impact motion estimation, including the transient disappearance of the target into the scotoma, increased position uncertainty associated with eccentric target positions, and increased oculomotor noise due to the use of a non-foveal locus for fixation and for eye movements. Observers performed a perceptual baseball task where they judged whether the target would intersect or miss a rectangular region (the plate). The target was extinguished before reaching the plate and participants were instructed either to fixate a marker or smoothly track the target before making the judgment. We tested nine eyes of six participants with MD and four control observers with simulated scotomata that matched those of individual participants with MD. Both groups used their habitual oculomotor locus-eccentric preferred retinal locus (PRL) for MD and fovea for controls. In the fixation condition, motion extrapolation was less accurate for controls with simulated scotomata than without, indicating that occlusion by the scotoma impacted the task. In both the fixation and pursuit conditions, MD participants with eccentric preferred retinal loci typically had worse motion extrapolation than controls with a matched artificial scotoma and foveal preferred retinal loci. Statistical analysis revealed occlusion and target eccentricity significantly impacted motion extrapolation in the pursuit condition, indicating that these factors make it challenging to estimate and track the path of a moving target in MD.</p>","PeriodicalId":49955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vision","volume":"25 1","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11781323/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.1.17","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Macular degeneration (MD), which affects the central visual field including the fovea, has a profound impact on acuity and oculomotor control. We used a motion extrapolation task to investigate the contribution of various factors that potentially impact motion estimation, including the transient disappearance of the target into the scotoma, increased position uncertainty associated with eccentric target positions, and increased oculomotor noise due to the use of a non-foveal locus for fixation and for eye movements. Observers performed a perceptual baseball task where they judged whether the target would intersect or miss a rectangular region (the plate). The target was extinguished before reaching the plate and participants were instructed either to fixate a marker or smoothly track the target before making the judgment. We tested nine eyes of six participants with MD and four control observers with simulated scotomata that matched those of individual participants with MD. Both groups used their habitual oculomotor locus-eccentric preferred retinal locus (PRL) for MD and fovea for controls. In the fixation condition, motion extrapolation was less accurate for controls with simulated scotomata than without, indicating that occlusion by the scotoma impacted the task. In both the fixation and pursuit conditions, MD participants with eccentric preferred retinal loci typically had worse motion extrapolation than controls with a matched artificial scotoma and foveal preferred retinal loci. Statistical analysis revealed occlusion and target eccentricity significantly impacted motion extrapolation in the pursuit condition, indicating that these factors make it challenging to estimate and track the path of a moving target in MD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黄斑变性的动眼力挑战影响运动外推。
黄斑变性(Macular degeneration, MD)影响包括中央凹在内的中央视野,对视力和动眼力控制有深远的影响。我们使用运动外推任务来研究可能影响运动估计的各种因素的贡献,包括目标在暗点中的短暂消失,与偏心目标位置相关的位置不确定性增加,以及由于使用非中央凹位点进行注视和眼球运动而增加的眼球运动噪声。观察者进行了一个感知棒球任务,他们判断目标是否会相交或错过一个矩形区域(盘子)。目标在到达盘子之前就熄灭了,参与者被指示在做出判断之前要么盯着一个标记,要么平稳地跟踪目标。我们测试了6名MD参与者的9只眼睛和4名对照观察者的模拟暗点,这些暗点与MD个体参与者的模拟暗点相匹配。两组人都使用他们的习惯性眼动偏心性首选视网膜位点(PRL)作为MD和中央凹作为对照。在注视条件下,有模拟暗点的对照组运动外推的准确性低于没有模拟暗点的对照组,这表明暗点遮挡影响了任务。在注视和追逐条件下,具有偏心视网膜优先位点的MD参与者通常比具有匹配的人工暗点和中央凹优先视网膜位点的对照组有更差的运动外推。统计分析表明,遮挡和目标偏心率对追踪条件下的运动外推有显著影响,表明这些因素给运动目标的轨迹估计和跟踪带来了挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vision
Journal of Vision 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
218
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Exploring all aspects of biological visual function, including spatial vision, perception, low vision, color vision and more, spanning the fields of neuroscience, psychology and psychophysics.
期刊最新文献
Different effects of flash-grab and frame stimuli on position shift and shape distortion. When sounds control sight: Associative learning modifies perceptual transitions in binocular rivalry. Microsaccadic modulation in goal-directed reaching. Retinal and extra-retinal contributions of blinking to perceptual alternation in bistable apparent motion. Frame effects across space and time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1