Manual wheelchair training programs: a scoping review of educational approaches and intended learning outcomes.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-06718-6
Kimberly Charlton, Carolyn Murray, Natasha Layton, Stacie Attrill
{"title":"Manual wheelchair training programs: a scoping review of educational approaches and intended learning outcomes.","authors":"Kimberly Charlton, Carolyn Murray, Natasha Layton, Stacie Attrill","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-06718-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Training programs grounded in educational theory offer a systematic framework to facilitate learning and outcomes. This scoping review aims to map the educational approaches documented for manual wheelchair training and to record intended learning outcomes and any relationships between learning theories, instructional design and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight databases; Cochrane's Library, EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, EmCare, Medline, ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Database and grey literature were searched in September 2023, with citation chaining for relevant papers. Included papers related to manual wheelchair training programs/protocols describing intended wheelchair training outcomes for adults and/or caregivers. Data extracted included study characteristics, type of intervention, explicit learning theories, instructional design principles and intended learning outcomes. The International Classification of Functioning and Kirkpatrick's evaluation framework were used to organise intended outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the forty-four articles included in this review, only fourteen explicitly used a learning theory in the instructional design of training. Training outcomes most commonly related to changes in knowledge/skills of manual wheelchair users (Level 2b of Kirkpatrick's evaluation (n = 43), with less emphasis on participatory outcomes. Training designs incorporating Social Cognitive Theory (n = 8) were more likely to explore long term training outcomes, compared with other training designs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Wheelchair training programs that are designed using learning theory are more likely to produce learning outcomes that are retained and meaningfully applied. Such longer terms outcomes could have systemic cost and efficiency implications, such as reduction in wheelchair falls and readmissions to hospital. Deliberate integration of learning theory into manual wheelchair training design is recommended to support broad outcomes and long-term learning. This design could synergise different learning theories.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"134"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06718-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Training programs grounded in educational theory offer a systematic framework to facilitate learning and outcomes. This scoping review aims to map the educational approaches documented for manual wheelchair training and to record intended learning outcomes and any relationships between learning theories, instructional design and outcomes.

Methods: Eight databases; Cochrane's Library, EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, EmCare, Medline, ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Database and grey literature were searched in September 2023, with citation chaining for relevant papers. Included papers related to manual wheelchair training programs/protocols describing intended wheelchair training outcomes for adults and/or caregivers. Data extracted included study characteristics, type of intervention, explicit learning theories, instructional design principles and intended learning outcomes. The International Classification of Functioning and Kirkpatrick's evaluation framework were used to organise intended outcomes.

Results: Of the forty-four articles included in this review, only fourteen explicitly used a learning theory in the instructional design of training. Training outcomes most commonly related to changes in knowledge/skills of manual wheelchair users (Level 2b of Kirkpatrick's evaluation (n = 43), with less emphasis on participatory outcomes. Training designs incorporating Social Cognitive Theory (n = 8) were more likely to explore long term training outcomes, compared with other training designs.

Conclusion: Wheelchair training programs that are designed using learning theory are more likely to produce learning outcomes that are retained and meaningfully applied. Such longer terms outcomes could have systemic cost and efficiency implications, such as reduction in wheelchair falls and readmissions to hospital. Deliberate integration of learning theory into manual wheelchair training design is recommended to support broad outcomes and long-term learning. This design could synergise different learning theories.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手动轮椅训练计划:教育方法和预期学习成果的范围审查。
背景:以教育理论为基础的培训项目提供了一个系统的框架来促进学习和成果。这一范围审查的目的是绘制手工轮椅训练的教育方法,记录预期的学习成果以及学习理论、教学设计和成果之间的任何关系。方法:8个数据库;检索Cochrane’s Library、EMBASE、CINAHL、PubMed、Scopus、EmCare、Medline、ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Database及灰色文献,并将相关论文加引链。包括与手动轮椅训练计划/协议相关的论文,描述了成人和/或护理人员的轮椅训练结果。提取的数据包括研究特征、干预类型、外显学习理论、教学设计原则和预期学习成果。国际功能分类和柯克帕特里克的评估框架被用来组织预期的结果。结果:在本综述纳入的44篇文章中,只有14篇明确地在培训的教学设计中使用了学习理论。培训结果通常与手动轮椅使用者的知识/技能变化有关(Kirkpatrick评估水平2b (n = 43)),较少强调参与性结果。与其他训练设计相比,纳入社会认知理论(n = 8)的训练设计更有可能探索长期训练结果。结论:使用学习理论设计的轮椅训练项目更有可能产生保留和有意义应用的学习成果。这种长期结果可能具有系统性的成本和效率影响,例如减少轮椅摔倒和再入院。建议有意地将学习理论整合到手动轮椅训练设计中,以支持广泛的结果和长期的学习。这种设计可以协同不同的学习理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
#MEDToo - sexual harassment in medical education: perceptions and coping strategies of medical students in Germany, a qualitative study. Managing transitions: a qualitative study of undergraduate international nursing students' experience of a mentoring program. Peer assessment and feedback for effective lecturing in basic medical sciences-a mixed method study. Research preparedness and competence among Nigerian medical and dental students applying for a research fellowship. Nursing students' development of clinical competence through the use of reflection prompts based on the nursing process during clinical education: a qualitative longitudinal study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1