The effect of bone relaxation on the simulated pull-off force of a cementless femoral knee implant

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS Journal of biomechanics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112528
Thomas Gersie , Thom Bitter , Robert Freeman , Nico Verdonschot , Dennis Janssen
{"title":"The effect of bone relaxation on the simulated pull-off force of a cementless femoral knee implant","authors":"Thomas Gersie ,&nbsp;Thom Bitter ,&nbsp;Robert Freeman ,&nbsp;Nico Verdonschot ,&nbsp;Dennis Janssen","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Aseptic loosening is the primary cause of revision in cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA), emphasizing the importance of strong initial stability for long-term implant success. Pre-clinical evaluations are crucial for understanding implant fixation mechanics and improving implant designs. Finite element (FE) analysis models often use linear elastic bone material models, which do not accurately reflect bone’s mechanical behavior. Incorporating a von Mises yield model to simulate bone’s plastic behavior improved predictions of primary stability but tends to overestimate fixation, potentially due to neglecting bone viscoelasticity. Stress relaxation in bone can affect primary stability by reducing press-fit forces on implants. This study aimed to include bone relaxation into FE models of femoral TKA reconstructions to investigate the impact of bone material models on primary fixation. Simulated pull-off tests were conducted using three material models: elastic, plastic, and plastic-viscoelastic. Six femoral reconstructions, previously used in another study, were included. The average pull-off force decreased (about 79%) from 31 kN with the elastic model to 6.3 kN when bone plasticity was included. Introducing stress relaxation showed a minimal effect, leading to an additional reduction in pull-off force of 0.8%. A significant positive correlation was found between bone mineral density and pull-off force across the three material models. Additionally, elastic strain energy within the femur correlated strongly with pull-off force, suggesting higher strain energy increases pull-off force. This study is the first to integrate plastic and viscoelastic bone behavior in FE simulations, offering insights into cementless implant fixation within context of realistic bone mechanics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 112528"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025000399","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aseptic loosening is the primary cause of revision in cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA), emphasizing the importance of strong initial stability for long-term implant success. Pre-clinical evaluations are crucial for understanding implant fixation mechanics and improving implant designs. Finite element (FE) analysis models often use linear elastic bone material models, which do not accurately reflect bone’s mechanical behavior. Incorporating a von Mises yield model to simulate bone’s plastic behavior improved predictions of primary stability but tends to overestimate fixation, potentially due to neglecting bone viscoelasticity. Stress relaxation in bone can affect primary stability by reducing press-fit forces on implants. This study aimed to include bone relaxation into FE models of femoral TKA reconstructions to investigate the impact of bone material models on primary fixation. Simulated pull-off tests were conducted using three material models: elastic, plastic, and plastic-viscoelastic. Six femoral reconstructions, previously used in another study, were included. The average pull-off force decreased (about 79%) from 31 kN with the elastic model to 6.3 kN when bone plasticity was included. Introducing stress relaxation showed a minimal effect, leading to an additional reduction in pull-off force of 0.8%. A significant positive correlation was found between bone mineral density and pull-off force across the three material models. Additionally, elastic strain energy within the femur correlated strongly with pull-off force, suggesting higher strain energy increases pull-off force. This study is the first to integrate plastic and viscoelastic bone behavior in FE simulations, offering insights into cementless implant fixation within context of realistic bone mechanics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨松弛对无骨水泥股骨膝关节假体模拟拔离力的影响。
无菌性松动是无骨水泥全膝关节置换术(TKA)翻修的主要原因,强调了强大的初始稳定性对长期植入成功的重要性。临床前评估是了解种植体固定力学和改进种植体设计的关键。有限元分析模型多采用线弹性骨材料模型,不能准确反映骨的力学行为。结合von Mises屈服模型来模拟骨的塑性行为,可以改善对初级稳定性的预测,但往往会高估固定,这可能是由于忽略了骨的粘弹性。骨内应力松弛可通过减少植入物的压合力而影响初级稳定性。本研究旨在将骨松弛纳入股骨TKA重建的FE模型,以研究骨材料模型对初次固定的影响。模拟拉脱试验采用三种材料模型:弹性、塑性和塑性粘弹性。包括先前在另一项研究中使用的6个股骨重建。当考虑骨可塑性时,平均拔离力从弹性模型的31 kN下降到6.3 kN,降幅约79%。引入应力松弛效果最小,导致拉拔力额外降低0.8%。在三种材料模型中发现骨矿物质密度和拉脱力之间存在显著的正相关。此外,股骨内的弹性应变能与脱拉力密切相关,表明应变能越高,脱拉力越大。该研究首次在有限元模拟中整合了骨的塑性和粘弹性行为,为现实骨力学背景下的无骨水泥植入物固定提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
期刊最新文献
Erratum to “Identifying the most prominent transversal gait patterns in children with torsional deformities using cluster analysis” [J. Biomech. 197 (2026) 113194] Prediction of ankle kinematics and kinetics in stair ascent motion using surface EMG feature inputs of lower extremity muscle combinations Acceleration corridors of small female post-mortem human subjects in near-side and far-side frontal oblique impacts Age-dependent mechanical heterogeneity in immature murine bone: A nanoindentation mapping study Tibialis anterior muscle function in ankle-foot deformities as derived from intraoperative force measurements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1