Joseph A. Gordon III , Zachary G. Brumm , Bahar Shahidi , Andrea C. Givens , Brenda A. Niederberger , Emily B. Kloss , Amirali Kamgar , Christian N. Majano , Karen R. Kelly , Samuel R. Ward , David B. Berry
{"title":"The impact of craft type on operational spine postures in military boat operators","authors":"Joseph A. Gordon III , Zachary G. Brumm , Bahar Shahidi , Andrea C. Givens , Brenda A. Niederberger , Emily B. Kloss , Amirali Kamgar , Christian N. Majano , Karen R. Kelly , Samuel R. Ward , David B. Berry","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>High-speed boat operators (HSBO) are exposed to high-impact forces and unstable platforms that are linked to spine pain and musculoskeletal injury risk. This study sought to determine the effects of different military occupational specialties (MOS) on spine kinematics in 86 active-duty personnel (64 HSBO and 22 Marines). The relationships between spine postures, pain, and disability were also examined. Upright MRI scans were performed in sitting and standing positions to determine sagittal cobb angle, angle with respect to the horizontal plane, sacral slope, T1 slope, and intervertebral angles of the lumbar and cervical spine. Disability and pain were assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A two-way repeated measures ANOVA analyzed the effects of MOS and position on spine kinematics, and a stepwise linear regression analyzed the influence of pain and disability. Main effects of position were found for lumbar sagittal cobb angle, sacral slope, and intervertebral angles from L2-S1 (p < 0.0001), and cervical sagittal cobb angle (p = 0.02). MOS significantly affected sagittal cobb angle (p = 0.05) and angle w.r.t horizontal (p < 0.0001). Neck disability explained 4 % of the variance in cervical cobb angle, T1 slope, and the intervertebral angle at C5-C6. Pain did not predict lumbar or cervical spine posture. Position has a significant impact on spine kinematics in all groups, with MOS-related differences in cervical spine posture. Subjective pain measures did not reliably predict spine posture, underscoring the necessity for objective diagnostic approaches and targeted interventions to mitigate injury risk in HSBO.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 112636"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025001472","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
High-speed boat operators (HSBO) are exposed to high-impact forces and unstable platforms that are linked to spine pain and musculoskeletal injury risk. This study sought to determine the effects of different military occupational specialties (MOS) on spine kinematics in 86 active-duty personnel (64 HSBO and 22 Marines). The relationships between spine postures, pain, and disability were also examined. Upright MRI scans were performed in sitting and standing positions to determine sagittal cobb angle, angle with respect to the horizontal plane, sacral slope, T1 slope, and intervertebral angles of the lumbar and cervical spine. Disability and pain were assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A two-way repeated measures ANOVA analyzed the effects of MOS and position on spine kinematics, and a stepwise linear regression analyzed the influence of pain and disability. Main effects of position were found for lumbar sagittal cobb angle, sacral slope, and intervertebral angles from L2-S1 (p < 0.0001), and cervical sagittal cobb angle (p = 0.02). MOS significantly affected sagittal cobb angle (p = 0.05) and angle w.r.t horizontal (p < 0.0001). Neck disability explained 4 % of the variance in cervical cobb angle, T1 slope, and the intervertebral angle at C5-C6. Pain did not predict lumbar or cervical spine posture. Position has a significant impact on spine kinematics in all groups, with MOS-related differences in cervical spine posture. Subjective pain measures did not reliably predict spine posture, underscoring the necessity for objective diagnostic approaches and targeted interventions to mitigate injury risk in HSBO.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.