The impact of craft type on operational spine postures in military boat operators

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS Journal of biomechanics Pub Date : 2025-03-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112636
Joseph A. Gordon III , Zachary G. Brumm , Bahar Shahidi , Andrea C. Givens , Brenda A. Niederberger , Emily B. Kloss , Amirali Kamgar , Christian N. Majano , Karen R. Kelly , Samuel R. Ward , David B. Berry
{"title":"The impact of craft type on operational spine postures in military boat operators","authors":"Joseph A. Gordon III ,&nbsp;Zachary G. Brumm ,&nbsp;Bahar Shahidi ,&nbsp;Andrea C. Givens ,&nbsp;Brenda A. Niederberger ,&nbsp;Emily B. Kloss ,&nbsp;Amirali Kamgar ,&nbsp;Christian N. Majano ,&nbsp;Karen R. Kelly ,&nbsp;Samuel R. Ward ,&nbsp;David B. Berry","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>High-speed boat operators (HSBO) are exposed to high-impact forces and unstable platforms that are linked to spine pain and musculoskeletal injury risk. This study sought to determine the effects of different military occupational specialties (MOS) on spine kinematics in 86 active-duty personnel (64 HSBO and 22 Marines). The relationships between spine postures, pain, and disability were also examined. Upright MRI scans were performed in sitting and standing positions to determine sagittal cobb angle, angle with respect to the horizontal plane, sacral slope, T1 slope, and intervertebral angles of the lumbar and cervical spine. Disability and pain were assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A two-way repeated measures ANOVA analyzed the effects of MOS and position on spine kinematics, and a stepwise linear regression analyzed the influence of pain and disability. Main effects of position were found for lumbar sagittal cobb angle, sacral slope, and intervertebral angles from L2-S1 (p &lt; 0.0001), and cervical sagittal cobb angle (p = 0.02). MOS significantly affected sagittal cobb angle (p = 0.05) and angle w.r.t horizontal (p &lt; 0.0001). Neck disability explained 4 % of the variance in cervical cobb angle, T1 slope, and the intervertebral angle at C5-C6. Pain did not predict lumbar or cervical spine posture. Position has a significant impact on spine kinematics in all groups, with MOS-related differences in cervical spine posture. Subjective pain measures did not reliably predict spine posture, underscoring the necessity for objective diagnostic approaches and targeted interventions to mitigate injury risk in HSBO.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 112636"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025001472","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High-speed boat operators (HSBO) are exposed to high-impact forces and unstable platforms that are linked to spine pain and musculoskeletal injury risk. This study sought to determine the effects of different military occupational specialties (MOS) on spine kinematics in 86 active-duty personnel (64 HSBO and 22 Marines). The relationships between spine postures, pain, and disability were also examined. Upright MRI scans were performed in sitting and standing positions to determine sagittal cobb angle, angle with respect to the horizontal plane, sacral slope, T1 slope, and intervertebral angles of the lumbar and cervical spine. Disability and pain were assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A two-way repeated measures ANOVA analyzed the effects of MOS and position on spine kinematics, and a stepwise linear regression analyzed the influence of pain and disability. Main effects of position were found for lumbar sagittal cobb angle, sacral slope, and intervertebral angles from L2-S1 (p < 0.0001), and cervical sagittal cobb angle (p = 0.02). MOS significantly affected sagittal cobb angle (p = 0.05) and angle w.r.t horizontal (p < 0.0001). Neck disability explained 4 % of the variance in cervical cobb angle, T1 slope, and the intervertebral angle at C5-C6. Pain did not predict lumbar or cervical spine posture. Position has a significant impact on spine kinematics in all groups, with MOS-related differences in cervical spine posture. Subjective pain measures did not reliably predict spine posture, underscoring the necessity for objective diagnostic approaches and targeted interventions to mitigate injury risk in HSBO.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
艇型对军用艇操作员操作脊柱姿势的影响
高速船操作员(HSBO)暴露在高冲击力和不稳定的平台上,这与脊柱疼痛和肌肉骨骼损伤风险有关。本研究旨在确定不同军事职业专业(MOS)对86名现役人员(64名HSBO和22名海军陆战队员)脊柱运动学的影响。脊柱姿势、疼痛和残疾之间的关系也被检查。在坐姿和站立位置进行直立MRI扫描,以确定矢状cobb角,相对于水平面的角度,骶骨斜率,T1斜率以及腰椎和颈椎的椎间角。用Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)、颈部残疾指数(NDI)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估残疾和疼痛。采用双向重复测量方差分析分析MOS和体位对脊柱运动学的影响,逐步线性回归分析疼痛和残疾的影响。体位的主要影响是腰椎矢状cobb角、骶骨斜率和L2-S1椎间角(p <;0.0001),颈矢状cobb角(p = 0.02)。MOS显著影响矢状cobb角(p = 0.05)和水平cobb角(p <;0.0001)。颈部残疾解释了颈椎cobb角、T1斜率和C5-C6椎间角变异的4%。疼痛不能预测腰椎或颈椎的姿势。在所有组中,体位对脊柱运动学均有显著影响,且与mos相关的颈椎体位存在差异。主观疼痛测量不能可靠地预测脊柱姿势,强调了客观诊断方法和有针对性的干预措施以减轻HSBO损伤风险的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
期刊最新文献
The influence of lower limb kinematic characteristics in stroke patients on gait speed mediated by paretic side propulsive force. Average rotation matrices for converting scapula- and glenoid-based coordinate systems to ISB recommendations. Corrigendum to "The impact of backpack load on adolescent stair descent safety and injury risk" [J. Biomech. 166 (2024) 112029]. Neural network surrogates for musculoskeletal models: An application to implant alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Tissue ingrowth in a porous acetabular component: Influence of mechanobioregulatory stimuli
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1