Evaluating the Impact of Pharmacotherapy in Augmenting Quit Rates Among Hispanic Adults in an App-Delivered Smoking Cessation Intervention: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR Formative Research Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.2196/69311
Margarita Santiago-Torres, Kristin E Mull, Brianna M Sullivan, Ana Paula Cupertino, Ramzi G Salloum, Matthew Triplette, Michael J Zvolensky, Jonathan B Bricker
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of Pharmacotherapy in Augmenting Quit Rates Among Hispanic Adults in an App-Delivered Smoking Cessation Intervention: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Margarita Santiago-Torres, Kristin E Mull, Brianna M Sullivan, Ana Paula Cupertino, Ramzi G Salloum, Matthew Triplette, Michael J Zvolensky, Jonathan B Bricker","doi":"10.2196/69311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hispanic adults receive less advice to quit smoking and use fewer evidence-based smoking cessation treatments compared to their non-Hispanic counterparts. Digital smoking cessation interventions, such as those delivered via smartphone apps, provide a feasible and within-reach treatment option for Hispanic adults who smoke and want to quit smoking. While the combination of pharmacotherapy and behavioral interventions are considered best practices for smoking cessation, its efficacy among Hispanic adults, especially alongside smartphone app-based interventions, is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This secondary analysis used data from a randomized controlled trial that compared the efficacy of 2 smoking cessation apps, iCanQuit (based on acceptance and commitment therapy) and QuitGuide (following US clinical practice guidelines), to explore the association between pharmacotherapy use and smoking cessation outcomes among the subsample of 173 Hispanic participants who reported on pharmacotherapy use. Given the randomized design, we first tested the potential interaction of pharmacotherapy use and intervention arm on 12-month cigarette smoking abstinence. We then examined whether the use of any pharmacotherapy (ie, nicotine replacement therapy [NRT], varenicline, or bupropion) and NRT alone augmented each app-based intervention efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants reported using pharmacotherapy on their own during the 3-month follow-up and cigarette smoking abstinence at the 12-month follow-up via web-based surveys. These data were used (1) to test the interaction effect of using pharmacotherapy to aid smoking cessation and intervention arm (iCanQuit vs QuitGuide) on smoking cessation at 12 months and (2) to test whether the use of pharmacotherapy to aid smoking cessation augmented the efficacy of each intervention arm to help participants successfully quit smoking.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The subsample of Hispanic participants was recruited from 30 US states. They were on average 34.5 (SD 9.3) years of age, 50.9% (88/173) were female, and 56.1% (97/173) reported smoking at least 10 cigarettes daily. Approximately 22% (38/173) of participants reported using pharmacotherapy to aid smoking cessation at the 3-month follow-up, including NRT, varenicline, or bupropion, with no difference between intervention arms. There was an interaction between pharmacotherapy use and intervention arm that marginally influenced 12-month quit rates at 12 months (P for interaction=.053). In the iCanQuit arm, 12-month missing-as-smoking quit rates were 43.8% (7/16) for pharmacotherapy users versus 28.8% (19/16) for nonusers (odds ratio 2.21, 95% CI 0.66-7.48; P=.20). In the QuitGuide arm, quit rates were 9.1% (2/22) for pharmacotherapy users versus 21.7% (15/69) for nonusers (odds ratio 0.36, 95% CI 0.07-1.72; P=.20). Results were similar for the use of NRT only.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combining pharmacotherapy to aid smoking cessation with a smartphone app-based behavioral intervention that teaches acceptance of cravings to smoke (iCanQuit) shows promise in improving quit rates among Hispanic adults. However, this combined approach was not effective with the US clinical guideline-based app (QuitGuide).</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02724462; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02724462.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>RR2-10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.4055.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e69311"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11874456/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/69311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hispanic adults receive less advice to quit smoking and use fewer evidence-based smoking cessation treatments compared to their non-Hispanic counterparts. Digital smoking cessation interventions, such as those delivered via smartphone apps, provide a feasible and within-reach treatment option for Hispanic adults who smoke and want to quit smoking. While the combination of pharmacotherapy and behavioral interventions are considered best practices for smoking cessation, its efficacy among Hispanic adults, especially alongside smartphone app-based interventions, is uncertain.

Objective: This secondary analysis used data from a randomized controlled trial that compared the efficacy of 2 smoking cessation apps, iCanQuit (based on acceptance and commitment therapy) and QuitGuide (following US clinical practice guidelines), to explore the association between pharmacotherapy use and smoking cessation outcomes among the subsample of 173 Hispanic participants who reported on pharmacotherapy use. Given the randomized design, we first tested the potential interaction of pharmacotherapy use and intervention arm on 12-month cigarette smoking abstinence. We then examined whether the use of any pharmacotherapy (ie, nicotine replacement therapy [NRT], varenicline, or bupropion) and NRT alone augmented each app-based intervention efficacy.

Methods: Participants reported using pharmacotherapy on their own during the 3-month follow-up and cigarette smoking abstinence at the 12-month follow-up via web-based surveys. These data were used (1) to test the interaction effect of using pharmacotherapy to aid smoking cessation and intervention arm (iCanQuit vs QuitGuide) on smoking cessation at 12 months and (2) to test whether the use of pharmacotherapy to aid smoking cessation augmented the efficacy of each intervention arm to help participants successfully quit smoking.

Results: The subsample of Hispanic participants was recruited from 30 US states. They were on average 34.5 (SD 9.3) years of age, 50.9% (88/173) were female, and 56.1% (97/173) reported smoking at least 10 cigarettes daily. Approximately 22% (38/173) of participants reported using pharmacotherapy to aid smoking cessation at the 3-month follow-up, including NRT, varenicline, or bupropion, with no difference between intervention arms. There was an interaction between pharmacotherapy use and intervention arm that marginally influenced 12-month quit rates at 12 months (P for interaction=.053). In the iCanQuit arm, 12-month missing-as-smoking quit rates were 43.8% (7/16) for pharmacotherapy users versus 28.8% (19/16) for nonusers (odds ratio 2.21, 95% CI 0.66-7.48; P=.20). In the QuitGuide arm, quit rates were 9.1% (2/22) for pharmacotherapy users versus 21.7% (15/69) for nonusers (odds ratio 0.36, 95% CI 0.07-1.72; P=.20). Results were similar for the use of NRT only.

Conclusions: Combining pharmacotherapy to aid smoking cessation with a smartphone app-based behavioral intervention that teaches acceptance of cravings to smoke (iCanQuit) shows promise in improving quit rates among Hispanic adults. However, this combined approach was not effective with the US clinical guideline-based app (QuitGuide).

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02724462; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02724462.

International registered report identifier (irrid): RR2-10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.4055.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估药物治疗对提高西班牙裔成人应用戒烟干预中戒烟率的影响:一项随机对照试验的二次分析
背景:与非西班牙裔成年人相比,西班牙裔成年人接受的戒烟建议较少,使用的循证戒烟治疗也较少。数字戒烟干预措施,例如通过智能手机应用程序提供的干预措施,为吸烟并希望戒烟的西班牙裔成年人提供了一种可行且触手可及的治疗选择。虽然药物治疗和行为干预相结合被认为是戒烟的最佳做法,但其在西班牙裔成年人中的效果,特别是与基于智能手机应用程序的干预相结合,尚不确定。目的:本二次分析使用了一项随机对照试验的数据,该试验比较了两个戒烟应用程序iCanQuit(基于接受和承诺治疗)和QuitGuide(遵循美国临床实践指南)的疗效,以探索173名报告使用药物治疗的西班牙裔参与者的子样本中药物治疗使用与戒烟结果之间的关系。考虑到随机设计,我们首先测试了药物治疗使用和干预组对12个月戒烟的潜在相互作用。然后,我们检查了是否使用任何药物治疗(即尼古丁替代疗法[NRT],伐尼克兰或安非他酮)和单独使用NRT增强了每种基于应用程序的干预效果。方法:通过网络调查,参与者报告在3个月的随访期间自行使用药物治疗,并在12个月的随访期间戒烟。这些数据用于(1)测试使用药物治疗辅助戒烟和干预组(iCanQuit vs QuitGuide)对12个月戒烟的相互作用;(2)测试使用药物治疗辅助戒烟是否增强了每个干预组帮助参与者成功戒烟的功效。结果:西班牙裔参与者的亚样本来自美国30个州。他们的平均年龄为34.5岁(SD 9.3), 50.9%(88/173)为女性,56.1%(97/173)报告每天至少吸烟10支。大约22%(38/173)的参与者报告在3个月的随访中使用药物治疗来帮助戒烟,包括NRT,伐尼克兰或安非他酮,干预组之间没有差异。药物治疗使用和干预组之间存在相互作用,对12个月戒烟率有轻微影响(相互作用P = 0.053)。在iCanQuit组中,药物治疗使用者12个月未戒烟率为43.8%(7/16),而非药物治疗使用者为28.8%(19/16)(优势比2.21,95% CI 0.66-7.48;P = .20)。在QuitGuide组中,药物治疗使用者的戒烟率为9.1%(2/22),而非药物治疗使用者的戒烟率为21.7%(15/69)(优势比0.36,95% CI 0.07-1.72;P = .20)。仅使用NRT的结果相似。结论:将药物治疗与基于智能手机应用程序的行为干预相结合,教导人们接受吸烟的渴望(iCanQuit),有望提高西班牙裔成年人的戒烟率。然而,这种联合方法在美国基于临床指南的应用程序(QuitGuide)中并不有效。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02724462;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02724462.International注册报告标识符(irrid): RR2-10.1001/ jamaintermed.2020.4055。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correction: Personalized Diabetes Treatment Support Using Large Language Models Fine-Tuned on Electronic Health Records: Development and Evaluation Study. Internet Addiction Among School Children: Cross-Sectional Analytical Study. Development and Evaluation of a Human-in-the-Loop Data Curation Training Program to Support a Digital Clinical Trial Platform: Descriptive Feasibility Study. Engagement Patterns With #NaturalRemedies on TikTok: Formative Analysis. Co-Designing a Digital Platform to Support a Culturally Adapted Family Intervention (CaFI:Digital) for Psychosis Among People of Sub-Saharan African and Caribbean Descent: Agile Co-Design Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1