Using an Interactive Voice Response Survey to Assess Patient Satisfaction in Ethiopia: Development and Feasibility Study.

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR Formative Research Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.2196/67452
Dessalegn Shamebo, Anagaw Derseh Mebratie, Catherine Arsenault
{"title":"Using an Interactive Voice Response Survey to Assess Patient Satisfaction in Ethiopia: Development and Feasibility Study.","authors":"Dessalegn Shamebo, Anagaw Derseh Mebratie, Catherine Arsenault","doi":"10.2196/67452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient satisfaction surveys can offer crucial information on the quality of care but are rarely conducted in low-income settings. In contrast with in-person exit interviews, phone-based interactive voice response (IVR) surveys may offer benefits including standardization, patient privacy, reduced social desirability bias, and cost and time efficiency. IVR surveys have rarely been tested in low-income settings, particularly for patient satisfaction surveys.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we tested the feasibility of using an IVR system to assess patient satisfaction with primary care services in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. We described the methodology, response rates, and survey costs and identified factors associated with survey participation, completion, and duration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were recruited in person from 18 public and private health facilities in Addis Ababa. Patients' sex, age, education, reasons for seeking care, and mobile phone numbers were collected. The survey included 15 questions that respondents answered using their phone keypad. We used a Heckman probit regression model to identify factors influencing the likelihood of IVR survey participation (picking up and answering at least 1 question) and completion (answering all survey questions) and a Weibull regression model to identify factors influencing the survey completion time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3403 individuals were approached across 18 health facilities. Nearly all eligible patients approached (2985/3167, 94.3%) had a functioning mobile phone, and 89.9% (2415/2685) of those eligible agreed to be enrolled in the study. Overall, 92.6% (2236/2415) picked up the call, 65.6% (1584/2415) answered at least 1 survey question, and 42.9% (1037/2415) completed the full survey. The average survey completion time was 8.1 (SD 1.7) minutes for 15 Likert-scale questions. We found that those aged 40-49 years and those aged 50+ years were substantially less likely to participate in (odds ratio 0.63, 95% CI 0.53-0.74) and complete the IVR survey (odds ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.65-0.90) compared to those aged 18-30 years. Higher education levels were also strongly associated with survey participation and completion. In adjusted models, those enrolled in private facilities were less likely to participate and complete the survey compared to those in public health centers. Being male, younger, speaking Amharic, using a private hospital, and being called after 8 PM were associated with a shorter survey duration. The average survey costs were US $7.90 per completed survey.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings reveal that an IVR survey is a feasible, low-cost, and rapid solution to assess patient satisfaction in an urban context in Ethiopia. However, survey implementation must be carefully planned and tailored to local challenges. Governments and health facilities should consider IVR to routinely collect patient satisfaction data to inform quality improvement strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e67452"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/67452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient satisfaction surveys can offer crucial information on the quality of care but are rarely conducted in low-income settings. In contrast with in-person exit interviews, phone-based interactive voice response (IVR) surveys may offer benefits including standardization, patient privacy, reduced social desirability bias, and cost and time efficiency. IVR surveys have rarely been tested in low-income settings, particularly for patient satisfaction surveys.

Objective: In this study, we tested the feasibility of using an IVR system to assess patient satisfaction with primary care services in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. We described the methodology, response rates, and survey costs and identified factors associated with survey participation, completion, and duration.

Methods: Patients were recruited in person from 18 public and private health facilities in Addis Ababa. Patients' sex, age, education, reasons for seeking care, and mobile phone numbers were collected. The survey included 15 questions that respondents answered using their phone keypad. We used a Heckman probit regression model to identify factors influencing the likelihood of IVR survey participation (picking up and answering at least 1 question) and completion (answering all survey questions) and a Weibull regression model to identify factors influencing the survey completion time.

Results: A total of 3403 individuals were approached across 18 health facilities. Nearly all eligible patients approached (2985/3167, 94.3%) had a functioning mobile phone, and 89.9% (2415/2685) of those eligible agreed to be enrolled in the study. Overall, 92.6% (2236/2415) picked up the call, 65.6% (1584/2415) answered at least 1 survey question, and 42.9% (1037/2415) completed the full survey. The average survey completion time was 8.1 (SD 1.7) minutes for 15 Likert-scale questions. We found that those aged 40-49 years and those aged 50+ years were substantially less likely to participate in (odds ratio 0.63, 95% CI 0.53-0.74) and complete the IVR survey (odds ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.65-0.90) compared to those aged 18-30 years. Higher education levels were also strongly associated with survey participation and completion. In adjusted models, those enrolled in private facilities were less likely to participate and complete the survey compared to those in public health centers. Being male, younger, speaking Amharic, using a private hospital, and being called after 8 PM were associated with a shorter survey duration. The average survey costs were US $7.90 per completed survey.

Conclusions: Our findings reveal that an IVR survey is a feasible, low-cost, and rapid solution to assess patient satisfaction in an urban context in Ethiopia. However, survey implementation must be carefully planned and tailored to local challenges. Governments and health facilities should consider IVR to routinely collect patient satisfaction data to inform quality improvement strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Designing a Smartphone-Based Virtual Reality App for Relaxation: Qualitative Crossover Study. A 4-Site Public Deliberation Project on the Acceptability of Youth Self-Consent in Biomedical HIV Prevention Trials: Assessment of Facilitator Fidelity to Key Principles. Acceptance of Unsupervised App-Based Cognitive Assessment in Outpatient Care: An Implementation Study. Machine Learning Approach to Identifying Wrong-Site Surgeries Using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Dataset: Development and Validation Study. Using an Interactive Voice Response Survey to Assess Patient Satisfaction in Ethiopia: Development and Feasibility Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1