Acceptability of hepatitis C testing using point-of-care testing and dried blood spot collection among people at risk of hepatitis C infection

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE International Journal of Drug Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104720
Annabelle Stevens , Lise Lafferty , Carla Treloar , Evan B. Cunningham , Gregory J. Dore , Jason Grebely , Alison D. Marshall
{"title":"Acceptability of hepatitis C testing using point-of-care testing and dried blood spot collection among people at risk of hepatitis C infection","authors":"Annabelle Stevens ,&nbsp;Lise Lafferty ,&nbsp;Carla Treloar ,&nbsp;Evan B. Cunningham ,&nbsp;Gregory J. Dore ,&nbsp;Jason Grebely ,&nbsp;Alison D. Marshall","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hepatitis C (HCV) testing innovations such as dried blood spot (DBS) and point-of-care testing should have fewer client-related barriers than traditional diagnostic pathways, yet there is limited evidence on their acceptability among people who inject drugs. To address this gap, this study sought to evaluate the acceptability of DBS and point-of-care testing among people at risk of HCV infection and understand the circumstances in which such testing is most preferred.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants were recruited from community sites involved in the Australian HCV Point-of-Care Testing Program. Inclusion criteria were aged ≥18 years, sufficient proficiency in the English language, history of HCV testing at least once, and informed consent. Between June and August 2023, in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted via telephone with clients on their perceptions and experiences of HCV DBS and point-of-care testing. Data were coded and analysed thematically with Sekhon's theoretical framework of acceptability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty participants were interviewed: 18 had previously received HCV DBS testing, 8 had received HCV point-of-care testing, 8 had experience with both, and 6 had no prior experience with either test. Most participants preferred point-of-care compared to DBS and venepuncture due to the shorter time to result and some identified that this reduced anxiety while waiting for results (burden). Among participants in this study, many felt that the provision of non-judgemental care was more important than whether testing was performed by peers (ethicality). Many participants indicated a preference for assisted collection when compared to self-collected or mail testing service (self-efficacy).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Applying Sekhon's acceptability framework highlighted remaining service gaps to bridge client HCV testing experiences, including enhanced education on testing modalities and their results, an increased need for non-judgemental care, and the use of peer support in community settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 104720"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395925000192","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Hepatitis C (HCV) testing innovations such as dried blood spot (DBS) and point-of-care testing should have fewer client-related barriers than traditional diagnostic pathways, yet there is limited evidence on their acceptability among people who inject drugs. To address this gap, this study sought to evaluate the acceptability of DBS and point-of-care testing among people at risk of HCV infection and understand the circumstances in which such testing is most preferred.

Methods

Participants were recruited from community sites involved in the Australian HCV Point-of-Care Testing Program. Inclusion criteria were aged ≥18 years, sufficient proficiency in the English language, history of HCV testing at least once, and informed consent. Between June and August 2023, in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted via telephone with clients on their perceptions and experiences of HCV DBS and point-of-care testing. Data were coded and analysed thematically with Sekhon's theoretical framework of acceptability.

Results

Forty participants were interviewed: 18 had previously received HCV DBS testing, 8 had received HCV point-of-care testing, 8 had experience with both, and 6 had no prior experience with either test. Most participants preferred point-of-care compared to DBS and venepuncture due to the shorter time to result and some identified that this reduced anxiety while waiting for results (burden). Among participants in this study, many felt that the provision of non-judgemental care was more important than whether testing was performed by peers (ethicality). Many participants indicated a preference for assisted collection when compared to self-collected or mail testing service (self-efficacy).

Conclusion

Applying Sekhon's acceptability framework highlighted remaining service gaps to bridge client HCV testing experiences, including enhanced education on testing modalities and their results, an increased need for non-judgemental care, and the use of peer support in community settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在有丙型肝炎感染风险的人群中使用即时检测和干血点采集进行丙型肝炎检测的可接受性。
背景:丙型肝炎(HCV)检测创新,如干血点(DBS)和即时检测,应该比传统诊断途径具有更少的与客户相关的障碍,但在注射吸毒者中可接受性方面的证据有限。为了解决这一差距,本研究试图评估DBS和即时检测在HCV感染风险人群中的可接受性,并了解这种检测最受欢迎的情况。方法:参与者从参与澳大利亚HCV即时检测项目的社区站点招募。纳入标准为年龄≥18岁,英语熟练程度,HCV检测史至少一次,知情同意。在2023年6月至8月期间,通过电话对客户进行了深入的半结构化访谈,了解他们对HCV DBS和护理点检测的看法和经验。用Sekhon的可接受性理论框架对数据进行主题编码和分析。结果:40名参与者接受了采访:18人以前接受过HCV DBS检测,8人接受过HCV即时检测,8人有两种检测的经验,6人没有任何一种检测的经验。与DBS和静脉穿刺相比,大多数参与者更喜欢即时护理,因为获得结果的时间更短,一些人认为这减少了等待结果时的焦虑(负担)。在这项研究的参与者中,许多人认为提供非判断性护理比是否由同伴进行测试(道德)更重要。与自我收集或邮件测试服务相比,许多参与者表示更倾向于辅助收集(自我效能)。结论:应用Sekhon的可接受性框架突出了仍然存在的服务差距,以弥合客户的HCV检测经验,包括加强对检测方式及其结果的教育,增加对非判断性护理的需求,以及在社区环境中使用同伴支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Everyday discrimination in individuals seeking treatment/receiving support for substance use and caregivers Drinking motives, socioeconomic factors and the harm-reduction potential of NoLo alcohol products for mid-life women How have liberalized drug policies impacted international policing practices across urban and rural jurisdictions? A scoping review Direct violence as drug-related harm: Basuco and harm reduction in Bogotá, Colombia Doubts and disconnection: Police reflections on drug decriminalization in British Columbia in the first year of implementation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1