Are school-based violence prevention interventions inclusive and effective for children with disabilities? A systematic review of global evidence.

IF 10 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2025-01-17 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103060
Emily Eldred, Karen Devries, Anja Zinke-Allmang, Rizwana Mallick, Waliyah Mughis, Lena Morgon Banks, Amiya Bhatia
{"title":"Are school-based violence prevention interventions inclusive and effective for children with disabilities? A systematic review of global evidence.","authors":"Emily Eldred, Karen Devries, Anja Zinke-Allmang, Rizwana Mallick, Waliyah Mughis, Lena Morgon Banks, Amiya Bhatia","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children with disabilities are twice as likely to experience violence compared to peers without disabilities. While evaluations of school-based interventions targeting the prevention of violence against children in schools are growing in number, it is unclear whether these interventions are inclusive of, or effective for, children with disabilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched six databases (Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, Global Health, PsycINFO, Web of Science) and utilised professional networks to identify systematic reviews which included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of school-based violence prevention interventions up to May 2024. Once we identified our final sample of systematic reviews (n = 29) we hand searched the included papers within these reviews and included all RCTs of school-based violence prevention interventions. We applied criteria to assess disability inclusion and conducted a narrative synthesis of study characteristics, adaptations to intervention and/or data collection design, and effect estimates. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023463384).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We identified 160 articles of school-based violence prevention interventions. Of these, 13 articles reporting on 10 trials (8.13%) explicitly mentioned disability: 3/10 trials reported on the magnitude of intervention effects among children with disabilities; 4/10 trials mentioned adaptations to research or intervention design to include children with disabilities; 6/10 trials mentioned disability as part of the sample characteristics but did not report further sub-group analysis. 3 trials were effective in reducing violence in schools for children with disabilities, with risk of bias ranging from 'low' (n = 1) to 'some concerns' (n = 2).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Despite growing evidence on how to prevent school violence, there is limited research on the effect of such interventions for children with disabilities. There is a need for future evaluations to stratify effects by disability, conduct disability-inclusive research, and tailor interventions for children with disabilities.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This research was partially funded by the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office under the PENDA project (PO8073).</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"80 ","pages":"103060"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11787422/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103060","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Children with disabilities are twice as likely to experience violence compared to peers without disabilities. While evaluations of school-based interventions targeting the prevention of violence against children in schools are growing in number, it is unclear whether these interventions are inclusive of, or effective for, children with disabilities.

Methods: We searched six databases (Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, Global Health, PsycINFO, Web of Science) and utilised professional networks to identify systematic reviews which included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of school-based violence prevention interventions up to May 2024. Once we identified our final sample of systematic reviews (n = 29) we hand searched the included papers within these reviews and included all RCTs of school-based violence prevention interventions. We applied criteria to assess disability inclusion and conducted a narrative synthesis of study characteristics, adaptations to intervention and/or data collection design, and effect estimates. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023463384).

Findings: We identified 160 articles of school-based violence prevention interventions. Of these, 13 articles reporting on 10 trials (8.13%) explicitly mentioned disability: 3/10 trials reported on the magnitude of intervention effects among children with disabilities; 4/10 trials mentioned adaptations to research or intervention design to include children with disabilities; 6/10 trials mentioned disability as part of the sample characteristics but did not report further sub-group analysis. 3 trials were effective in reducing violence in schools for children with disabilities, with risk of bias ranging from 'low' (n = 1) to 'some concerns' (n = 2).

Interpretation: Despite growing evidence on how to prevent school violence, there is limited research on the effect of such interventions for children with disabilities. There is a need for future evaluations to stratify effects by disability, conduct disability-inclusive research, and tailor interventions for children with disabilities.

Funding: This research was partially funded by the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office under the PENDA project (PO8073).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以学校为基础的暴力预防干预措施对残疾儿童具有包容性和有效性吗?对全球证据的系统回顾。
背景:残疾儿童遭受暴力的可能性是非残疾儿童的两倍。虽然对以预防校园暴力侵害儿童为目标的学校干预措施的评估越来越多,但尚不清楚这些干预措施是否包括残疾儿童,或对残疾儿童是否有效。方法:我们检索了6个数据库(Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, Global Health, PsycINFO, Web of Science),并利用专业网络确定系统综述,其中包括截至2024年5月的基于学校的暴力预防干预的随机对照试验(rct)。一旦我们确定了系统评价的最终样本(n = 29),我们手动检索了这些评价中纳入的论文,并纳入了所有基于学校的暴力预防干预的随机对照试验。我们应用标准来评估残疾纳入,并对研究特征、对干预措施的适应和/或数据收集设计以及效果估计进行了叙述性综合。我们使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。本综述已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42023463384)。研究结果:我们确定了160篇关于校园暴力预防干预的文章。其中,13篇文章报道了10项试验(8.13%)明确提到了残疾:3/10的试验报告了残疾儿童干预效果的大小;4/10的试验提到了对研究或干预设计的适应,以纳入残疾儿童;6/10的试验提到残疾是样本特征的一部分,但没有报道进一步的亚组分析。3项试验在减少残疾儿童学校暴力方面有效,其偏倚风险从“低”(n = 1)到“一些问题”(n = 2)不等。解释:尽管关于如何预防学校暴力的证据越来越多,但关于此类干预措施对残疾儿童的影响的研究有限。未来有必要进行评估,按残疾对影响进行分层,开展残疾包容性研究,并为残疾儿童量身定制干预措施。资助:本研究部分由外交、联邦和发展办公室在PENDA项目(PO8073)下资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Effects of modified release hydrocortisone on restoration of early morning cortisol, quality of life, and fatigue in adrenal insufficiency (The CHAMPAIN study): a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, cross-over study comparing Chronocort and Plenadren"[eClinical Medicine 91(2026); 103714]. Impact of molecular point-of-care testing for respiratory pathogens on antibiotic use and clinical outcomes in acute respiratory tract infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reno-protective effects of statins among patients with chronic kidney disease in Hong Kong: a target trial emulation. Progestogen use and the risk of intracranial meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Global inequities in organ transplantation, 2008-2023: trends, unmet need, and policy implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1