Birth Outcomes among Infants Born between 2006 and 2018 after Maternal Exposure during Pregnancy to Ultrafine Particles from Aviation around a Large International Airport in the Netherlands.

IF 10.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Health Perspectives Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1289/EHP14398
José H Jacobs, Alina Nicolaie, Maciej Strak, Jurriaan Hoekstra, Eline F de Vries, Joost Wesseling, Danny Houthuijs, Nicole A H Janssen
{"title":"Birth Outcomes among Infants Born between 2006 and 2018 after Maternal Exposure during Pregnancy to Ultrafine Particles from Aviation around a Large International Airport in the Netherlands.","authors":"José H Jacobs, Alina Nicolaie, Maciej Strak, Jurriaan Hoekstra, Eline F de Vries, Joost Wesseling, Danny Houthuijs, Nicole A H Janssen","doi":"10.1289/EHP14398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People who live near airports are exposed to higher concentrations of ultrafine particles (UFPs) from aviation. Pregnant women and their fetuses, in particular, are considered to be highly susceptible to environmental exposures.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Using existing national databases, we investigated associations between adverse birth outcomes and exposure to UFPs from aviation (UFP-aviation) at the residential address during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified <math><mrow><mo>∼</mo><mn>286,000</mn></mrow></math> singleton birth records (from between 2006 and 2018) from mothers who, for at least 6 months during pregnancy, lived in a <math><mrow><mn>50</mn><mo>×</mo><mn>56</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>km</mi></mrow></math> area around Schiphol Airport. This information was linked to modeled monthly averaged UFP-aviation concentrations at the residential address during pregnancy. We modeled the association between exposure to UFP-aviation during pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes through logistic regression, adjusting for individual and neighborhood level covariates. We performed a number of sensitivity analyses to investigate the robustness of the results, including adjustment for other air pollutants and noise.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Effect estimates, expressed per 3,500 particles/cm<sup>3</sup> (approximately the 5th-9th percentile difference) increase, were generally positive in the main model for preterm birth (PTB) and small for gestational age (SGA) [PTB <math><mrow><mtext>OR</mtext><mo>=</mo></mrow></math> 1.02 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.07) and SGA <math><mrow><mtext>OR</mtext><mo>=</mo></mrow></math> 1.02 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.07)] and congenital anomalies (CAs) at birth [any CA <math><mrow><mtext>OR</mtext><mo>=</mo></mrow></math> 1.05 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.07)]. Associations with UFP-aviation became stronger in some of the sensitivity analyses, such as when the four municipalities with the lowest exposure were excluded (for PTB, SGA, and CA), when the population was restricted to mothers with a Dutch background (PTB), after nonlinear adjustment for nitrogen dioxide (<math><mrow><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>NO</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></mrow></math>) and elemental carbon (EC) (PTB), after including municipality as a random effect (CA), and in some specific strata of the population. No associations were found with infant mortality, low Apgar score, and low birth weight.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found suggestive evidence for associations between exposure to UFP-aviation during pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14398.</p>","PeriodicalId":11862,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health Perspectives","volume":"133 2","pages":"27001"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11790014/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14398","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People who live near airports are exposed to higher concentrations of ultrafine particles (UFPs) from aviation. Pregnant women and their fetuses, in particular, are considered to be highly susceptible to environmental exposures.

Objective: Using existing national databases, we investigated associations between adverse birth outcomes and exposure to UFPs from aviation (UFP-aviation) at the residential address during pregnancy.

Methods: We identified 286,000 singleton birth records (from between 2006 and 2018) from mothers who, for at least 6 months during pregnancy, lived in a 50×56km area around Schiphol Airport. This information was linked to modeled monthly averaged UFP-aviation concentrations at the residential address during pregnancy. We modeled the association between exposure to UFP-aviation during pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes through logistic regression, adjusting for individual and neighborhood level covariates. We performed a number of sensitivity analyses to investigate the robustness of the results, including adjustment for other air pollutants and noise.

Results: Effect estimates, expressed per 3,500 particles/cm3 (approximately the 5th-9th percentile difference) increase, were generally positive in the main model for preterm birth (PTB) and small for gestational age (SGA) [PTB OR= 1.02 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.07) and SGA OR= 1.02 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.07)] and congenital anomalies (CAs) at birth [any CA OR= 1.05 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.07)]. Associations with UFP-aviation became stronger in some of the sensitivity analyses, such as when the four municipalities with the lowest exposure were excluded (for PTB, SGA, and CA), when the population was restricted to mothers with a Dutch background (PTB), after nonlinear adjustment for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and elemental carbon (EC) (PTB), after including municipality as a random effect (CA), and in some specific strata of the population. No associations were found with infant mortality, low Apgar score, and low birth weight.

Conclusions: We found suggestive evidence for associations between exposure to UFP-aviation during pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14398.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Health Perspectives
Environmental Health Perspectives 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
388
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly peer-reviewed journal supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, part of the National Institutes of Health under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Its mission is to facilitate discussions on the connections between the environment and human health by publishing top-notch research and news. EHP ranks third in Public, Environmental, and Occupational Health, fourth in Toxicology, and fifth in Environmental Sciences.
期刊最新文献
Birth Outcomes among Infants Born between 2006 and 2018 after Maternal Exposure during Pregnancy to Ultrafine Particles from Aviation around a Large International Airport in the Netherlands. IARC Workshop on the Key Characteristics of Carcinogens: Assessment of End Points for Evaluating Mechanistic Evidence of Carcinogenic Hazards. Associations of Prenatal Mercury Exposure and PUFA with Telomere Length and mtDNA Copy Number in 7-Year-Old Children in the Seychelles Child Development Nutrition Cohort 2. Differential Effectiveness of Water, Sanitation, and Handwashing Interventions to Reduce Child Diarrhea in Dry and Rainy Seasons: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intervention Trials. Invited Perspective: Understanding the Links between Weather and Environmental Health to Strengthen Climate Resilience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1