Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Delirium and Risk Factor Identification in Intensive Care Unit Patients With Burns: Retrospective Observational Study.

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR Formative Research Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.2196/65190
Ryo Esumi, Hiroki Funao, Eiji Kawamoto, Ryota Sakamoto, Asami Ito-Masui, Fumito Okuno, Toru Shinkai, Atsuya Hane, Kaoru Ikejiri, Yuichi Akama, Arong Gaowa, Eun Jeong Park, Ryo Momosaki, Ryuji Kaku, Motomu Shimaoka
{"title":"Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Delirium and Risk Factor Identification in Intensive Care Unit Patients With Burns: Retrospective Observational Study.","authors":"Ryo Esumi, Hiroki Funao, Eiji Kawamoto, Ryota Sakamoto, Asami Ito-Masui, Fumito Okuno, Toru Shinkai, Atsuya Hane, Kaoru Ikejiri, Yuichi Akama, Arong Gaowa, Eun Jeong Park, Ryo Momosaki, Ryuji Kaku, Motomu Shimaoka","doi":"10.2196/65190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of delirium in patients with burns receiving treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) is high, reaching up to 77%, and has been associated with increased mortality rates. Therefore, early identification of patients at high risk of delirium onset is essential for improving treatment strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to create a machine learning model for predicting delirium in patients with burns during their ICU stay using patient data from the first day of ICU admission and identify predictive factors for ICU delirium in patients with burns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study focused on 82 patients with burns aged ≥18 years who were admitted to the ICU at Mie University Hospital for ≥24 hours between January 2015 and June 2023. In total, 70 variables were measured in patients upon ICU admission and used as explanatory variables in the ICU delirium prediction model. Delirium was assessed using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist every 8 hours after ICU admission. A total of 10 different machine learning methods were used to predict ICU delirium. Multiple receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted for various machine learning models, and the area under the curve (AUC) for each was compared. In addition, the top 15 risk factors contributing to delirium onset were identified using Shapley additive explanations analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 10 machine learning models tested, logistic regression (mean AUC 0.906, SD 0.073), support vector machine (mean AUC 0.897, SD 0.056), k-nearest neighbor (mean AUC 0.894, SD 0.060), neural network (mean AUC 0.857, SD 0.058), random forest (mean AUC 0.850, SD 0.074), adaptive boosting (mean AUC 0.832, SD 0.094), gradient boosting machine (mean AUC 0.821, SD 0.074), and naïve Bayes (mean AUC 0.827, SD 0.095) demonstrated the highest accuracy in predicting ICU delirium. Specifically, 24-hour urine output (from ICU admission to 24 hours), oxygen saturation, burn area, total bilirubin level, and intubation upon ICU admission were identified as the major risk factors for delirium onset. In addition, variables, such as the proportion of white blood cell fractions, including monocytes; methemoglobin concentration; and respiratory rate, were identified as important risk factors for ICU delirium.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated the ability of machine learning models trained using vital signs and blood data upon ICU admission to predict delirium in patients with burns during their ICU stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":" ","pages":"e65190"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11923481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/65190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The incidence of delirium in patients with burns receiving treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) is high, reaching up to 77%, and has been associated with increased mortality rates. Therefore, early identification of patients at high risk of delirium onset is essential for improving treatment strategies.

Objective: This study aimed to create a machine learning model for predicting delirium in patients with burns during their ICU stay using patient data from the first day of ICU admission and identify predictive factors for ICU delirium in patients with burns.

Methods: This study focused on 82 patients with burns aged ≥18 years who were admitted to the ICU at Mie University Hospital for ≥24 hours between January 2015 and June 2023. In total, 70 variables were measured in patients upon ICU admission and used as explanatory variables in the ICU delirium prediction model. Delirium was assessed using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist every 8 hours after ICU admission. A total of 10 different machine learning methods were used to predict ICU delirium. Multiple receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted for various machine learning models, and the area under the curve (AUC) for each was compared. In addition, the top 15 risk factors contributing to delirium onset were identified using Shapley additive explanations analysis.

Results: Among the 10 machine learning models tested, logistic regression (mean AUC 0.906, SD 0.073), support vector machine (mean AUC 0.897, SD 0.056), k-nearest neighbor (mean AUC 0.894, SD 0.060), neural network (mean AUC 0.857, SD 0.058), random forest (mean AUC 0.850, SD 0.074), adaptive boosting (mean AUC 0.832, SD 0.094), gradient boosting machine (mean AUC 0.821, SD 0.074), and naïve Bayes (mean AUC 0.827, SD 0.095) demonstrated the highest accuracy in predicting ICU delirium. Specifically, 24-hour urine output (from ICU admission to 24 hours), oxygen saturation, burn area, total bilirubin level, and intubation upon ICU admission were identified as the major risk factors for delirium onset. In addition, variables, such as the proportion of white blood cell fractions, including monocytes; methemoglobin concentration; and respiratory rate, were identified as important risk factors for ICU delirium.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated the ability of machine learning models trained using vital signs and blood data upon ICU admission to predict delirium in patients with burns during their ICU stay.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习的ICU烧伤患者谵妄预测和危险因素识别:一项回顾性观察研究。
背景:在重症监护病房(ICU)接受治疗的烧伤患者谵妄的发生率很高,高达77%,并且与死亡率增加有关。因此,早期识别谵妄发作的高危患者对于改善治疗策略至关重要。目的:本研究旨在建立一个机器学习模型,利用入院第一天的患者数据预测烧伤患者在ICU住院期间的谵妄,并确定烧伤患者ICU谵妄的预测因素。方法:选取2015年1月至2023年6月在Mie大学附属医院ICU住院24 h及以上的82例年龄≥18岁的烧伤患者为研究对象。在ICU入院时测量患者的70个变量,并将其作为ICU谵妄预测模型的解释变量。在ICU入院后每8小时使用重症监护谵妄筛查清单评估谵妄。采用10种不同的机器学习方法预测ICU谵妄。绘制各种机器学习模型的多个接收者工作特征曲线,并比较每条曲线下的面积(AUC)。此外,使用Shapley加性解释分析确定了导致谵妄发作的前15个危险因素。结果:10种机器学习模型中,逻辑回归(AUC: 0.906±0.073)、支持向量机(AUC: 0.897±0.056)、k近邻(AUC: 0.894±0.060)、神经网络(AUC: 0.857±0.058)、随机森林(AUC: 0.850±0.074)、AdaBoost (AUC: 0.832±0.094)、梯度增强机(AUC: 0.821±0.074)、朴素贝叶斯(AUC: 0.827±0.095)预测ICU谵妄的准确率最高。其中,24小时尿量(入院至24小时)、血氧饱和度、烧伤面积、总胆红素水平、入院时插管是谵妄发作的主要危险因素。此外,诸如白细胞比例(包括单核细胞)、高铁血红蛋白浓度和呼吸频率等变量被确定为ICU谵妄的重要危险因素。结论:本研究证明了机器学习模型在ICU入院时接受生命体征和血液数据训练的能力,可以预测烧伤患者在ICU住院期间的谵妄。临床试验:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Knowledge graphs based on meta-analysis papers improve the quality of case formulation: a mixed methods design. Exploring Feature Priorities and User Needs in Developing Virtual Study Assistants. Health-Related Quality of Life Before and After Sobriety in Combination With an Adjunctive Journaling App in Patients With Alcohol-Related Liver Disease: Prospective Single-Arm Study. Automated Annotation of Pain Chronicity in Patients With Back Pain by Using Electronic Health Records: Retrospective Study. Cross-Cultural Differences in Public Discourse on COVID-19 Vaccination in the United States and South Korea: Cross-Sectional Analysis Using Natural Language Processing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1