Using Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE) to Assess Pharmaceutical Chemistry Practical Work

IF 2.9 3区 教育学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Chemical Education Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00965
Nour El Houda Ben Fatma, Wiem Ben Ayed, Raafa Ben Saada, Rania Aouina, Radhwen Mhidi, Wadi Saihi, Meriem Laribi and Mohamed Ali Soussi*, 
{"title":"Using Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE) to Assess Pharmaceutical Chemistry Practical Work","authors":"Nour El Houda Ben Fatma,&nbsp;Wiem Ben Ayed,&nbsp;Raafa Ben Saada,&nbsp;Rania Aouina,&nbsp;Radhwen Mhidi,&nbsp;Wadi Saihi,&nbsp;Meriem Laribi and Mohamed Ali Soussi*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Traditional assessment of practical work may depend on the examiner and may barely cover all learning objectives. To standardize the assessment of the practical work in pharmaceutical chemistry, an Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE) was developed and conducted among 142 fourth-year students of pharmacy. The evaluation included five stations that covered learning objectives studied during practical sessions. The scenarios involved drug identification through colorimetric reactions, thin-layer chromatography, and melting point measurement. Determination of the content of a sample, the calculation and the interpretation of a drug assay result, were also tested. The mean mark for the OSPE assessment was significantly lower compared to traditional assessment (15.02/20 ± 1.81 vs 15.82/20 ± 2.48, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). However, a preliminary analysis shows that OSPE was preferred (56%), and that station 2, involving drug identification by thin layer chromatography, requires more time than the time allocated to each station (11 min). Despite the fact that it is time-consuming and needs many examiners, OSPE has been found to meet the teaching objectives of pharmaceutical chemistry practical work.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"102 1","pages":"216–222 216–222"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00965","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional assessment of practical work may depend on the examiner and may barely cover all learning objectives. To standardize the assessment of the practical work in pharmaceutical chemistry, an Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE) was developed and conducted among 142 fourth-year students of pharmacy. The evaluation included five stations that covered learning objectives studied during practical sessions. The scenarios involved drug identification through colorimetric reactions, thin-layer chromatography, and melting point measurement. Determination of the content of a sample, the calculation and the interpretation of a drug assay result, were also tested. The mean mark for the OSPE assessment was significantly lower compared to traditional assessment (15.02/20 ± 1.81 vs 15.82/20 ± 2.48, p < 0.001). However, a preliminary analysis shows that OSPE was preferred (56%), and that station 2, involving drug identification by thin layer chromatography, requires more time than the time allocated to each station (11 min). Despite the fact that it is time-consuming and needs many examiners, OSPE has been found to meet the teaching objectives of pharmaceutical chemistry practical work.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运用客观结构化实习考试(OSPE)评价药物化学实习工作
传统的实际作业评估可能取决于考官,而且可能几乎没有涵盖所有的学习目标。为规范药物化学专业实践工作考核,对142名药学四年级学生进行了客观结构化实践考核。评估包括五个站点,涵盖了在实践课程中学习的学习目标。这些场景包括通过比色反应、薄层色谱和熔点测量进行药物鉴定。样品含量的测定,药物分析结果的计算和解释,也进行了测试。与传统评估相比,OSPE评估的平均得分显著降低(15.02/20±1.81 vs 15.82/20±2.48,p <;0.001)。然而,初步分析表明,OSPE是首选(56%),并且涉及薄层色谱药物鉴定的2号工位所需的时间比分配给每个工位的时间(11分钟)要多。虽然耗时长,审查员多,但已经发现ose能够满足药物化学实际工作的教学目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Education
Journal of Chemical Education 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.
期刊最新文献
Issue Publication Information Issue Editorial Masthead Spicy Electrochemistry: Quantifying Chili Heat as a Didactic Approach to Incorporate Electroanalysis into the Undergraduate Curriculum Chemistry Teachers’ Perception of Students’ Difficulties in Reading and Drawing Chemical Structures Advancing Environmental Justice through Chemical Education: Perspective from New Orleans’ Water and Air Quality Challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1