Meta-autoethnography as a co-constructive descriptive and narrative methodology: Post-pandemic responses to new research agendas in intercultural relations

IF 2.8 2区 社会学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL International Journal of Intercultural Relations Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2025.102144
Benjamin H. Nam , Qiong Bai , Alexander Scott English , Steve J. Kulich
{"title":"Meta-autoethnography as a co-constructive descriptive and narrative methodology: Post-pandemic responses to new research agendas in intercultural relations","authors":"Benjamin H. Nam ,&nbsp;Qiong Bai ,&nbsp;Alexander Scott English ,&nbsp;Steve J. Kulich","doi":"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2025.102144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents a meta-autoethnography utilizing a co-constructive lens for mixed-method descriptive and narrative analyses to explore post-pandemic responses and new emerging research trends in intercultural relations. Four co-authors combined their research output related to the COVID-19 pandemic, which entails descriptive analyses of the selected 20 quantitative and 20 qualitative publications. The descriptive results summarized primary contexts, processes, and findings. In turn, the co-authors captured their subjectivities, co-constructively undertaking historical, social network, and autobiographical projects. They reflected on each one’s historical, comparative, and critical sensitivities to propose new research agendas in intercultural relations. The co-authors considered theoretical insights from C. Wright Mills’ “<em>The Sociological Imagination</em>” and his conceptualizations of liberal practicality and interdisciplinary approaches to social science research. Therefore, this paper proposes essential research agendas in the intercultural context of Sino-foreign relations and beyond through methodologically rigorous analyses of quantitative and qualitative publications and collective writings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48216,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 102144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176725000070","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a meta-autoethnography utilizing a co-constructive lens for mixed-method descriptive and narrative analyses to explore post-pandemic responses and new emerging research trends in intercultural relations. Four co-authors combined their research output related to the COVID-19 pandemic, which entails descriptive analyses of the selected 20 quantitative and 20 qualitative publications. The descriptive results summarized primary contexts, processes, and findings. In turn, the co-authors captured their subjectivities, co-constructively undertaking historical, social network, and autobiographical projects. They reflected on each one’s historical, comparative, and critical sensitivities to propose new research agendas in intercultural relations. The co-authors considered theoretical insights from C. Wright Mills’ “The Sociological Imagination” and his conceptualizations of liberal practicality and interdisciplinary approaches to social science research. Therefore, this paper proposes essential research agendas in the intercultural context of Sino-foreign relations and beyond through methodologically rigorous analyses of quantitative and qualitative publications and collective writings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
元自我民族志作为一种共同建设性的描述和叙事方法:大流行后对跨文化关系新研究议程的回应
本文提出了一种元自我民族志,利用共同构建的视角进行混合方法的描述性和叙述性分析,以探索大流行后的反应和跨文化关系中新兴的研究趋势。四位共同作者将他们与COVID-19大流行相关的研究成果结合起来,这需要对选定的20份定量和20份定性出版物进行描述性分析。描述性结果总结了主要背景、过程和发现。反过来,共同作者捕捉他们的主体性,共同承担历史,社会网络和自传体项目。他们反思了各自的历史、比较和批判敏感性,提出了跨文化关系的新研究议程。合著者考虑了c·赖特·米尔斯(C. Wright Mills)的《社会学想象》(The Sociological Imagination)的理论见解,以及他对社会科学研究的自由实践性和跨学科方法的概念化。因此,本文通过对定量和定性出版物和集体著作的方法上的严格分析,提出了在中外关系及其他文化背景下的基本研究议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: IJIR is dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding of theory, practice, and research in intergroup relations. The contents encompass theoretical developments, field-based evaluations of training techniques, empirical discussions of cultural similarities and differences, and critical descriptions of new training approaches. Papers selected for publication in IJIR are judged to increase our understanding of intergroup tensions and harmony. Issue-oriented and cross-discipline discussion is encouraged. The highest priority is given to manuscripts that join theory, practice, and field research design. By theory, we mean conceptual schemes focused on the nature of cultural differences and similarities.
期刊最新文献
Resilience in the face of crisis: Community and individual resilience in large and small jewish communities in Brazil Post-October 7, 2023, attack Reciprocal adaptation as synergistic support for international secondary students in Canada Cross-regional acculturative stress and mental well-being among undergraduate students in China “Do I fit in here?” How immigrants’ endorsement of social markers is related to their wellbeing in three migrant receiving societies Why we became targets: Bullying victimization attributions across collectivist and individualist contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1