Impact of a biological anti-mycotoxin feed additive on aflatoxin milk transfer, performance, and biomarkers of liver and renal function in Jersey cows

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Animal Feed Science and Technology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2024.116181
Jefferson R. Gandra , Caio S. Takiya , Tiago A. Del Valle , Erika R. de Sena Gandra , Regis L. Missio , Cibeli A. Pedrini , Euclides R. de Oliveira , Milena Bugoni , Rafael H.T.B. Goes
{"title":"Impact of a biological anti-mycotoxin feed additive on aflatoxin milk transfer, performance, and biomarkers of liver and renal function in Jersey cows","authors":"Jefferson R. Gandra ,&nbsp;Caio S. Takiya ,&nbsp;Tiago A. Del Valle ,&nbsp;Erika R. de Sena Gandra ,&nbsp;Regis L. Missio ,&nbsp;Cibeli A. Pedrini ,&nbsp;Euclides R. de Oliveira ,&nbsp;Milena Bugoni ,&nbsp;Rafael H.T.B. Goes","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2024.116181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mycotoxins are highly stable and can persist from grain harvest through animal feeding, potentially transferring to milk and exposing humans to these toxins. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of feeding an aluminosilicate-based product or a biological anti-mycotoxin additive on milk aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) concentration, milk production and composition, complete blood cell count, and biomarkers of renal and liver function. Five primiparous Jersey cows (105 ± 3 days in milk, milk yield 15.0 ± 4.25 kg/d) were used in a 5 × 5 Latin square experiment, where periods were composed of 12 d for treatment adaptation, 4 d for sampling, and 5 d for washout. Treatment sequences randomly assigned to cows included a control (CON) treatment without aflatoxin challenge and four treatments with an artificially contaminated diet containing aflatoxins at 100 µg/kg diet DM. These treatments were: 1) Mycotoxin (MTX), aflatoxin challenge with no anti-mycotoxin additive; 2) Adsorbent (ADS), aflatoxin challenge with an aluminosilicate-based product at 0.1 % diet DM; 3) Biological anti-mycotoxin additive 1 (AM1), aflatoxin challenge with AM at 0.056 % diet DM; and 4) Biological anti-mycotoxin additive 3 (AM3), aflatoxin challenge with AM at 0.167 % diet DM. The AM was composed of microminerals, methionine, silymarin, yeast, and lactic acid bacteria. Milk AFM1 concentrations were the lowest in CON (0.05 µg/kg), followed by AM3(0.24 µg/kg), with intermediate levels in AM1 (0.50 µg/kg) and ADS (0.60 µg/kg), and highest in MTX (0.86 µg/kg). Milk yield was the highest for AM3 (21.8 kg/d), with intermediate values observed for CON (17.5 kg/d) and AM1 (19.4 kg/d), and the lowest production observed for MTX (16.4 kg/d). Milk fat yield was the highest for AM3, with intermediate values observed for CON and AM1, and the lowest yield found for ADS and MTX. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in blood was the highest for AM3, with intermediate values observed for AM1 and ADS, and the lowest for CON and MTX. Urea to creatinine ratio was greater in CON and MTX groups compared to the other treatments. Blood alanine aminotransferase concentration was the highest for MTX, with intermediate values for CON, and the lowest values for ADS, AM1, and AM3. Blood gamma-glutamyl transferase concentration was the highest for MTX, with intermediate values observed for CON, AM1, and AM3, and the lowest value observed for ADS. The AM additive at the highest dose was more effective in reducing milk AFM1 excretion than ADS. The AM3 group demonstrated superior productivity compared to both the groups fed an artificially contaminated diet and the control group.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"319 ","pages":"Article 116181"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840124003092","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mycotoxins are highly stable and can persist from grain harvest through animal feeding, potentially transferring to milk and exposing humans to these toxins. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of feeding an aluminosilicate-based product or a biological anti-mycotoxin additive on milk aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) concentration, milk production and composition, complete blood cell count, and biomarkers of renal and liver function. Five primiparous Jersey cows (105 ± 3 days in milk, milk yield 15.0 ± 4.25 kg/d) were used in a 5 × 5 Latin square experiment, where periods were composed of 12 d for treatment adaptation, 4 d for sampling, and 5 d for washout. Treatment sequences randomly assigned to cows included a control (CON) treatment without aflatoxin challenge and four treatments with an artificially contaminated diet containing aflatoxins at 100 µg/kg diet DM. These treatments were: 1) Mycotoxin (MTX), aflatoxin challenge with no anti-mycotoxin additive; 2) Adsorbent (ADS), aflatoxin challenge with an aluminosilicate-based product at 0.1 % diet DM; 3) Biological anti-mycotoxin additive 1 (AM1), aflatoxin challenge with AM at 0.056 % diet DM; and 4) Biological anti-mycotoxin additive 3 (AM3), aflatoxin challenge with AM at 0.167 % diet DM. The AM was composed of microminerals, methionine, silymarin, yeast, and lactic acid bacteria. Milk AFM1 concentrations were the lowest in CON (0.05 µg/kg), followed by AM3(0.24 µg/kg), with intermediate levels in AM1 (0.50 µg/kg) and ADS (0.60 µg/kg), and highest in MTX (0.86 µg/kg). Milk yield was the highest for AM3 (21.8 kg/d), with intermediate values observed for CON (17.5 kg/d) and AM1 (19.4 kg/d), and the lowest production observed for MTX (16.4 kg/d). Milk fat yield was the highest for AM3, with intermediate values observed for CON and AM1, and the lowest yield found for ADS and MTX. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in blood was the highest for AM3, with intermediate values observed for AM1 and ADS, and the lowest for CON and MTX. Urea to creatinine ratio was greater in CON and MTX groups compared to the other treatments. Blood alanine aminotransferase concentration was the highest for MTX, with intermediate values for CON, and the lowest values for ADS, AM1, and AM3. Blood gamma-glutamyl transferase concentration was the highest for MTX, with intermediate values observed for CON, AM1, and AM3, and the lowest value observed for ADS. The AM additive at the highest dose was more effective in reducing milk AFM1 excretion than ADS. The AM3 group demonstrated superior productivity compared to both the groups fed an artificially contaminated diet and the control group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物抗霉菌毒素饲料添加剂对泽西奶牛黄曲霉毒素转乳、生产性能及肝肾生物标志物的影响
真菌毒素高度稳定,可在谷物收获后通过饲养动物而持续存在,有可能转移到牛奶中,使人类接触到这些毒素。本研究旨在比较饲喂硅酸铝基产品和生物抗霉菌毒素添加剂对牛奶黄曲霉毒素M1 (AFM1)浓度、产奶量和组成、全血细胞计数以及肾脏和肝脏功能生物标志物的影响。选取5头泽西奶牛(产乳105 ± 3 d,产奶量15.0 ± 4.25 kg/d),进行5 × 5拉丁方试验,试验期为12 d处理适应期,4 d取样期,5 d洗脱期。随机分配给奶牛的处理顺序包括不给黄曲霉毒素攻毒的对照(CON)处理和添加黄曲霉毒素100 µg/kg DM的人工污染饲粮的4个处理。这些处理分别为:1)霉菌毒素(MTX),黄曲霉毒素攻毒,不添加抗霉菌毒素添加剂;2)吸附剂(ADS),添加0.1% %日粮DM的硅酸铝基产品处理黄曲霉毒素;3)生物抗霉菌毒素添加剂1 (AM1),在0.056 %日粮DM水平上添加AM对黄曲霉毒素的攻毒;4)生物抗真菌毒素添加剂3 (AM3),在饲粮DM为0.167 %时添加AM攻毒黄曲霉毒素,AM主要由微量矿物质、蛋氨酸、水飞蓟素、酵母和乳酸菌组成。牛奶AFM1浓度在CON中最低(0.05 µg/kg),其次是AM3(0.24 µg/kg), AM1(0.50 µg/kg)和ADS(0.60 µg/kg)处于中等水平,MTX最高(0.86 µg/kg)。产奶量最高的是AM3(21.8 kg/d),中间值为CON(17.5 kg/d)和AM1(19.4 kg/d),最低的是MTX(16.4 kg/d)。乳脂产量以AM3最高,CON和AM1居中,ADS和MTX最低。血液中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值AM3最高,AM1和ADS居中,CON和MTX最低。CON组和MTX组尿素与肌酐比值高于其他治疗组。血丙氨酸转氨酶浓度MTX最高,CON居中,ADS、AM1和AM3最低。血γ -谷氨酰转移酶浓度在MTX组最高,CON、AM1和AM3组居中,ADS组最低。最高剂量的AM添加剂在减少牛奶AFM1排泄方面比ADS更有效。与人工污染饲粮组和对照组相比,AM3组表现出更高的生产力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Feed Science and Technology
Animal Feed Science and Technology 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding. Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome. The journal covers the following areas: Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement) Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins) Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.
期刊最新文献
Dietary glycerol monolaurate improves flesh quality and extends shelf life of grass carp Ctenopharyngodon idella fed with high-fat diet Dietary cumin polysaccharides improve growth, digestion, and systemic health via enhanced antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and hypolipidemic activities, contributing to increased disease resistance in largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) Evaluating poultry fat and crude palm oil blends on growth performance, fatty acid profile, lipid metabolism and antioxidant capacity in juvenile Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer) Effects of butyric acid and resistant starch supplementation on gut microbiota, fermentation and growth in weanling pigs fed propionic acid-preserved grain Effects of chop length of alfalfa hay on growth performance, daily behavior, and hypothalamic transcriptome in Small-tailed Han sheep
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1