The multi-criteria ranking method for criterion-oriented regret three-way decision

IF 3 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE International Journal of Approximate Reasoning Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.ijar.2025.109374
Weidong Wan , Kai Zhang , Ligang Zhou
{"title":"The multi-criteria ranking method for criterion-oriented regret three-way decision","authors":"Weidong Wan ,&nbsp;Kai Zhang ,&nbsp;Ligang Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2025.109374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recently, the criterion-oriented three-way decision has garnered widespread attention as it considers the decision-makers' preferences in handling multi-criteria decision-making problems. However, due to the fact that some criterion-oriented three-way decision models do not accurately consider the specific deviation between the object evaluation value and the criterion preference value when calculating the loss function, some of the objects show the weakness of ranking failure. In order to eliminate this weakness, this paper considers this deviation as the decision-maker's regret psychology, combines the regret theory, proposes a new loss function and constructs a new criterion-oriented regret three-way decision model. Firstly, an innovative approach for determining the loss function is introduced, integrating the decision-maker's basic demands with regret theory. Secondly, thresholds are derived by combining the decision-maker's basic demands with two optimization models. Thirdly, the <em>k</em>-means++ clustering algorithm is employed to derive the objects' fuzzy depictions. Then, this paper proposes a practical method for calculating conditional probabilities by combining the concept of closeness with the fuzzy depictions of the objects. Next, a multi-criteria ranking method founded on criterion-oriented regret three-way decision is proposed. Finally, the applicability of the innovative sequencing method is verified by combining parametric and comparative analyses for the computer hardware selection problem. Additionally, in dataset experiments, the proposed method is further validated on datasets containing known ranking results and datasets containing ordered classification.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13842,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","volume":"179 ","pages":"Article 109374"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888613X25000155","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, the criterion-oriented three-way decision has garnered widespread attention as it considers the decision-makers' preferences in handling multi-criteria decision-making problems. However, due to the fact that some criterion-oriented three-way decision models do not accurately consider the specific deviation between the object evaluation value and the criterion preference value when calculating the loss function, some of the objects show the weakness of ranking failure. In order to eliminate this weakness, this paper considers this deviation as the decision-maker's regret psychology, combines the regret theory, proposes a new loss function and constructs a new criterion-oriented regret three-way decision model. Firstly, an innovative approach for determining the loss function is introduced, integrating the decision-maker's basic demands with regret theory. Secondly, thresholds are derived by combining the decision-maker's basic demands with two optimization models. Thirdly, the k-means++ clustering algorithm is employed to derive the objects' fuzzy depictions. Then, this paper proposes a practical method for calculating conditional probabilities by combining the concept of closeness with the fuzzy depictions of the objects. Next, a multi-criteria ranking method founded on criterion-oriented regret three-way decision is proposed. Finally, the applicability of the innovative sequencing method is verified by combining parametric and comparative analyses for the computer hardware selection problem. Additionally, in dataset experiments, the proposed method is further validated on datasets containing known ranking results and datasets containing ordered classification.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面向准则的后悔三向决策的多准则排序方法
近年来,基于准则的三向决策由于考虑了决策者在处理多准则决策问题时的偏好而受到广泛关注。然而,由于一些面向准则的三向决策模型在计算损失函数时没有准确考虑目标评价值与准则偏好值之间的具体偏差,导致部分目标表现出排序失败的弱点。为了消除这一弱点,本文将这种偏差视为决策者的后悔心理,结合后悔理论,提出了新的损失函数,构建了新的面向准则的后悔三向决策模型。首先,将决策者的基本需求与后悔理论相结合,提出了一种确定损失函数的创新方法。其次,将决策者的基本需求与两种优化模型相结合,推导出阈值。第三,采用k-means++聚类算法推导出目标的模糊描述。然后,本文提出了一种实用的计算条件概率的方法,该方法将接近度的概念与物体的模糊描述相结合。其次,提出了一种基于准则导向后悔三向决策的多准则排序方法。最后,结合参数分析和对比分析,验证了创新排序方法在计算机硬件选择问题中的适用性。此外,在数据集实验中,在包含已知排序结果的数据集和包含有序分类的数据集上进一步验证了该方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
170
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Approximate Reasoning is intended to serve as a forum for the treatment of imprecision and uncertainty in Artificial and Computational Intelligence, covering both the foundations of uncertainty theories, and the design of intelligent systems for scientific and engineering applications. It publishes high-quality research papers describing theoretical developments or innovative applications, as well as review articles on topics of general interest. Relevant topics include, but are not limited to, probabilistic reasoning and Bayesian networks, imprecise probabilities, random sets, belief functions (Dempster-Shafer theory), possibility theory, fuzzy sets, rough sets, decision theory, non-additive measures and integrals, qualitative reasoning about uncertainty, comparative probability orderings, game-theoretic probability, default reasoning, nonstandard logics, argumentation systems, inconsistency tolerant reasoning, elicitation techniques, philosophical foundations and psychological models of uncertain reasoning. Domains of application for uncertain reasoning systems include risk analysis and assessment, information retrieval and database design, information fusion, machine learning, data and web mining, computer vision, image and signal processing, intelligent data analysis, statistics, multi-agent systems, etc.
期刊最新文献
Submodular neighborhood covering reduction for tri-partition classification MACO-SMOTE: A multi-adaptive center oversampling technique for imbalanced data Feature selection with a lexicographic social ranking method HALO: Hardness-aware bilevel-inspired contrastive graph clustering Measuring the distance between single random inputs and OWA operators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1