Buddhamas P. Kriengwatana , Ruedi G. Nager , Alex South , Martin Ullrich , Emily L. Doolittle
{"title":"Playing music to animals: an interdisciplinary approach to improving our understanding of animals' responses to music","authors":"Buddhamas P. Kriengwatana , Ruedi G. Nager , Alex South , Martin Ullrich , Emily L. Doolittle","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2025.123074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Humans have profoundly changed the global soundscape. Studying how nonhuman animals respond to music can contribute to a better understanding of the effect of sound on animals. Animals are frequently exposed to human music, whether intentionally (for example, in laboratory settings), or unintentionally (for example, when animals live in close proximity to humans). Although several papers examine animals' responses to music, these typically do so from a purely animal behavioural perspective, sometimes missing relevant details about salient features of the music being played. An interdisciplinary approach that places musical and scientific knowledge on equal footing can improve our understanding of how animals respond to music and music-like sounds, in new and exciting ways. Here, we show with a systematic review that crucial factors (intrinsic music properties, listener properties, playback context and producer properties and contexts; ILPP) are not being adequately considered or reported in recently published scientific articles on the effects of music on animals, which hinders scientific reproducibility within this area of study. These problems are caused by improper referencing of music sources, misunderstanding of music and unexamined assumptions about individual variation and preferences between individuals of the same or different species. We then suggest that Berlyne’s psychobiological theory might provide a useful framework for studying how animals respond to human-generated sounds.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50788,"journal":{"name":"Animal Behaviour","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 123074"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347225000016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Humans have profoundly changed the global soundscape. Studying how nonhuman animals respond to music can contribute to a better understanding of the effect of sound on animals. Animals are frequently exposed to human music, whether intentionally (for example, in laboratory settings), or unintentionally (for example, when animals live in close proximity to humans). Although several papers examine animals' responses to music, these typically do so from a purely animal behavioural perspective, sometimes missing relevant details about salient features of the music being played. An interdisciplinary approach that places musical and scientific knowledge on equal footing can improve our understanding of how animals respond to music and music-like sounds, in new and exciting ways. Here, we show with a systematic review that crucial factors (intrinsic music properties, listener properties, playback context and producer properties and contexts; ILPP) are not being adequately considered or reported in recently published scientific articles on the effects of music on animals, which hinders scientific reproducibility within this area of study. These problems are caused by improper referencing of music sources, misunderstanding of music and unexamined assumptions about individual variation and preferences between individuals of the same or different species. We then suggest that Berlyne’s psychobiological theory might provide a useful framework for studying how animals respond to human-generated sounds.
期刊介绍:
Growing interest in behavioural biology and the international reputation of Animal Behaviour prompted an expansion to monthly publication in 1989. Animal Behaviour continues to be the journal of choice for biologists, ethologists, psychologists, physiologists, and veterinarians with an interest in the subject.