Foraging location preferences reflect memory interference associated with spatial learning tasks in a food-caching bird

IF 2.1 2区 生物学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Animal Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2024.123052
Lauren M. Benedict , Virginia K. Heinen , Joseph F. Welklin , Benjamin R. Sonnenberg , Lauren E. Whitenack , Eli S. Bridge , Vladimir V. Pravosudov
{"title":"Foraging location preferences reflect memory interference associated with spatial learning tasks in a food-caching bird","authors":"Lauren M. Benedict ,&nbsp;Virginia K. Heinen ,&nbsp;Joseph F. Welklin ,&nbsp;Benjamin R. Sonnenberg ,&nbsp;Lauren E. Whitenack ,&nbsp;Eli S. Bridge ,&nbsp;Vladimir V. Pravosudov","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2024.123052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Strong memories interfere with learning new information through proactive interference, potentially contributing to a trade-off between retaining older memories and acquiring newer ones. Due to mixed evidence for such a trade-off, it is unclear to what extent proactive interference may impact fitness-related behaviours in wild populations. Here, we explored the effects of proactive interference on memory retention and acquisition in wild mountain chickadees, <em>Poecile gambeli</em>, by assessing foraging behaviour at feeder arrays after birds had completed a spatial learning and memory task and a subsequent reversal learning task and when all feeders provided food. Overall, post-testing foraging behaviour was consistent with predictions of proactive interference. Chickadees that learned the location of a food reward better in the first spatial learning and memory task later foraged more from the first task's rewarding location and less from the reversal task's rewarding location, compared to birds that performed worse. In contrast, chickadees that learned the new information better in the reversal learning task later foraged more from the reversal task's rewarding location and less from the initial memory task's rewarding location. These results suggest that interference from strong memories had a lasting effect on foraging preferences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50788,"journal":{"name":"Animal Behaviour","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 123052"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347224003634","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Strong memories interfere with learning new information through proactive interference, potentially contributing to a trade-off between retaining older memories and acquiring newer ones. Due to mixed evidence for such a trade-off, it is unclear to what extent proactive interference may impact fitness-related behaviours in wild populations. Here, we explored the effects of proactive interference on memory retention and acquisition in wild mountain chickadees, Poecile gambeli, by assessing foraging behaviour at feeder arrays after birds had completed a spatial learning and memory task and a subsequent reversal learning task and when all feeders provided food. Overall, post-testing foraging behaviour was consistent with predictions of proactive interference. Chickadees that learned the location of a food reward better in the first spatial learning and memory task later foraged more from the first task's rewarding location and less from the reversal task's rewarding location, compared to birds that performed worse. In contrast, chickadees that learned the new information better in the reversal learning task later foraged more from the reversal task's rewarding location and less from the initial memory task's rewarding location. These results suggest that interference from strong memories had a lasting effect on foraging preferences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
觅食位置偏好反映了贮藏食物的鸟类与空间学习任务相关的记忆干扰
强记忆通过主动干扰干扰学习新信息,潜在地导致在保留旧记忆和获取新记忆之间的权衡。由于这种权衡的证据不一,目前尚不清楚主动干预在多大程度上可能影响野生种群的健康相关行为。在这里,我们通过评估鸟类在完成空间学习和记忆任务以及随后的反向学习任务后,在所有喂食者提供食物的情况下,在喂食器阵列上的觅食行为,探讨了主动干扰对野生山雀记忆保留和获取的影响。总体而言,测试后的觅食行为与主动干预的预测一致。与表现较差的鸟类相比,在第一个空间学习和记忆任务中更好地掌握了食物奖励位置的山雀,后来更多地从第一个任务的奖励位置觅食,而较少地从反向任务的奖励位置觅食。相比之下,在逆向学习任务中学习新信息更好的山雀后来更多地从逆向任务的奖励位置觅食,而较少地从初始记忆任务的奖励位置觅食。这些结果表明,强烈记忆的干扰对觅食偏好有持久的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Behaviour
Animal Behaviour 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.00%
发文量
236
审稿时长
10.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Growing interest in behavioural biology and the international reputation of Animal Behaviour prompted an expansion to monthly publication in 1989. Animal Behaviour continues to be the journal of choice for biologists, ethologists, psychologists, physiologists, and veterinarians with an interest in the subject.
期刊最新文献
Creatures of habit: similar but more repeatable behaviours in insular compared with mainland lizards Dogs’ behaviour is more similar to that of children than to that of cats in a prosocial problem situation Sperm storage ability is associated with oviposition but not mating behaviour differences in macrobiotid tardigrades Male great bowerbirds upregulate multiple sexual signals following bower wall removal Signal compression associated with Menzerath’s law affects the reproductive success of male frogs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1