{"title":"Structural evolution characteristics of sulfur in coal during gold-tube thermal simulation","authors":"Liping Xue , Yuegang Tang , Shuo Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.fuproc.2025.108183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study used a gold tube thermal simulation experiment to investigate the release of gases, the formation of free sulfur-containing compounds, and the evolution of coal macromolecules and organic sulfur structures. Results indicate that at Easy%R<sub>o</sub> = 0.71, the drying coefficient (C<sub>1</sub>/ΣC<sub>1</sub><sub>–</sub><sub>5</sub>) of high-organic‑sulfur coal is significantly higher than that of low-organic‑sulfur coal. When Easy%R<sub>o</sub> ≥ 3.64, the organic sulfur content in coal significantly promotes methane generation. At Easy%R<sub>o</sub> = 1.75, small molecules of free organic sulfur are most abundant in coal. At Easy%R<sub>o</sub> ≥ 3.64, low and high-organic‑sulfur coals produce elemental sulfur S<sub>8</sub> and ester sulfate compounds. FTIR analysis reveals that high-organic‑sulfur coal contains more aliphatic hydrocarbon structures, resulting in lower aromaticity parameter I than low-organic‑sulfur coal at the same coalification level. In contrast, the hydrocarbon generation potential factor “A” is higher, indicating that organic sulfur inhibits coal aromatization, and high-organic‑sulfur coal has a higher hydrocarbon generation potential. XPS analysis shows that thiophene and sulfoxide are relatively more abundant in high-organic‑sulfur coal, with the highest reaching 91.24 % in SHOS coal. The aromaticity of organic sulfur rapidly increases when Easy%R<sub>o</sub> < 1.75, followed by possible inhibition of thiophenic sulfur production by sulfones and sulfoxides in coal, resulting in decreased aromaticity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":326,"journal":{"name":"Fuel Processing Technology","volume":"268 ","pages":"Article 108183"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fuel Processing Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378382025000074","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study used a gold tube thermal simulation experiment to investigate the release of gases, the formation of free sulfur-containing compounds, and the evolution of coal macromolecules and organic sulfur structures. Results indicate that at Easy%Ro = 0.71, the drying coefficient (C1/ΣC1–5) of high-organic‑sulfur coal is significantly higher than that of low-organic‑sulfur coal. When Easy%Ro ≥ 3.64, the organic sulfur content in coal significantly promotes methane generation. At Easy%Ro = 1.75, small molecules of free organic sulfur are most abundant in coal. At Easy%Ro ≥ 3.64, low and high-organic‑sulfur coals produce elemental sulfur S8 and ester sulfate compounds. FTIR analysis reveals that high-organic‑sulfur coal contains more aliphatic hydrocarbon structures, resulting in lower aromaticity parameter I than low-organic‑sulfur coal at the same coalification level. In contrast, the hydrocarbon generation potential factor “A” is higher, indicating that organic sulfur inhibits coal aromatization, and high-organic‑sulfur coal has a higher hydrocarbon generation potential. XPS analysis shows that thiophene and sulfoxide are relatively more abundant in high-organic‑sulfur coal, with the highest reaching 91.24 % in SHOS coal. The aromaticity of organic sulfur rapidly increases when Easy%Ro < 1.75, followed by possible inhibition of thiophenic sulfur production by sulfones and sulfoxides in coal, resulting in decreased aromaticity.
期刊介绍:
Fuel Processing Technology (FPT) deals with the scientific and technological aspects of converting fossil and renewable resources to clean fuels, value-added chemicals, fuel-related advanced carbon materials and by-products. In addition to the traditional non-nuclear fossil fuels, biomass and wastes, papers on the integration of renewables such as solar and wind energy and energy storage into the fuel processing processes, as well as papers on the production and conversion of non-carbon-containing fuels such as hydrogen and ammonia, are also welcome. While chemical conversion is emphasized, papers on advanced physical conversion processes are also considered for publication in FPT. Papers on the fundamental aspects of fuel structure and properties will also be considered.