Ricardo Messias , Pedro M.S. Carvalho , Jorge Sousa
{"title":"Hybrid distribution network planning to incorporate virtual capacity from distributed flexibility resources","authors":"Ricardo Messias , Pedro M.S. Carvalho , Jorge Sousa","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.101892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Flexibility, defined as the ability to change load demand and generation injection over time, is touted as a key strategy to overcoming the challenges of increased net-load variability that come with higher penetration of variable renewable energy sources (VRES). Increased net-load variability places greater demands on the electrical grid, whose development pace is targeted as a bottleneck to achieving a decarbonized energy system. Policymakers and regulators want to mitigate the limitations in grid development by compelling distribution system operators (DSO) to consider the locally available distributed flexibility resources (DFR) as virtual capacity providers when planning the expansion of the distribution networks' physical assets. This analysis focuses on flexibility from the DSO perspective, trying to set an end-to-end epistemological common ground for policymakers, regulators and DSOs. It analyses the current public policy framework, setting the conventional planning objectives as a basis to understand the flexibility boundaries, and proposes an optimal capacity planning methodology where flexibility is taken as a new decision dimension, whose value can be obtained using a counterfactual approach, to be used in flexibility markets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 101892"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725000074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Flexibility, defined as the ability to change load demand and generation injection over time, is touted as a key strategy to overcoming the challenges of increased net-load variability that come with higher penetration of variable renewable energy sources (VRES). Increased net-load variability places greater demands on the electrical grid, whose development pace is targeted as a bottleneck to achieving a decarbonized energy system. Policymakers and regulators want to mitigate the limitations in grid development by compelling distribution system operators (DSO) to consider the locally available distributed flexibility resources (DFR) as virtual capacity providers when planning the expansion of the distribution networks' physical assets. This analysis focuses on flexibility from the DSO perspective, trying to set an end-to-end epistemological common ground for policymakers, regulators and DSOs. It analyses the current public policy framework, setting the conventional planning objectives as a basis to understand the flexibility boundaries, and proposes an optimal capacity planning methodology where flexibility is taken as a new decision dimension, whose value can be obtained using a counterfactual approach, to be used in flexibility markets.
期刊介绍:
Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services.
Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.