Centrifuge test study on the influence mechanism of anchor cable installation on the seismic response of pile‒anchor structures

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109160
Yu Wang , Tong Zheng , Rui Sun , Qiangqiang Sun , Xiao Long , Hongshuai Liu , Wenhao Qi
{"title":"Centrifuge test study on the influence mechanism of anchor cable installation on the seismic response of pile‒anchor structures","authors":"Yu Wang ,&nbsp;Tong Zheng ,&nbsp;Rui Sun ,&nbsp;Qiangqiang Sun ,&nbsp;Xiao Long ,&nbsp;Hongshuai Liu ,&nbsp;Wenhao Qi","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anchored stabilizing piles (ASPs) are composed of ordinary stabilizing piles (SPs) and anchor cables and have been widely used in seismic reinforcement projects for high and steep slopes. However, the differences in the seismic responses and their underlying mechanisms caused by the installation of anchor cables remain unclear. To this end, based on two sets of centrifuge model tests, the seismic response differences of the same slope reinforced with ASPs and SPs were compared. The impact and mechanism of anchor cable installation were analyzed from multiple perspectives, including slope failure characteristics, structural internal forces and pile‒soil contact stress. Compared with SPs, ASPs showed the following results: (1) the addition of anchor cables caused abnormal acceleration amplification on the slope near the anchoring point of the pile, and seismic motion propagated along the anchor cables. (2) The stability of the reinforced slope surface was significantly improved, and the peak settlement at the top of the slope was reduced by 75.8 %. (3) The seismic soil pressure on the upper part of the pile had significantly increased, an overall 'inverted trapezoidal' distribution was observed, and the stability of the soil arch between the piles was significantly improved. (4) The residual value of the dynamic bending moment was significantly reduced, but the positive and negative peak values were not significantly different from those of the SPs. (5) Anchor cables mainly played a role in changing the load-bearing mode of the pile rather than being the main load-bearing components.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 109160"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726124007127","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anchored stabilizing piles (ASPs) are composed of ordinary stabilizing piles (SPs) and anchor cables and have been widely used in seismic reinforcement projects for high and steep slopes. However, the differences in the seismic responses and their underlying mechanisms caused by the installation of anchor cables remain unclear. To this end, based on two sets of centrifuge model tests, the seismic response differences of the same slope reinforced with ASPs and SPs were compared. The impact and mechanism of anchor cable installation were analyzed from multiple perspectives, including slope failure characteristics, structural internal forces and pile‒soil contact stress. Compared with SPs, ASPs showed the following results: (1) the addition of anchor cables caused abnormal acceleration amplification on the slope near the anchoring point of the pile, and seismic motion propagated along the anchor cables. (2) The stability of the reinforced slope surface was significantly improved, and the peak settlement at the top of the slope was reduced by 75.8 %. (3) The seismic soil pressure on the upper part of the pile had significantly increased, an overall 'inverted trapezoidal' distribution was observed, and the stability of the soil arch between the piles was significantly improved. (4) The residual value of the dynamic bending moment was significantly reduced, but the positive and negative peak values were not significantly different from those of the SPs. (5) Anchor cables mainly played a role in changing the load-bearing mode of the pile rather than being the main load-bearing components.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
446
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering. Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.
期刊最新文献
Performance of Reyhanlı Dam during February 6, 2023 Kahramanmaraş-Türkiye earthquake sequence Shaking table experiments to investigate the seismic response of drag embedded anchors Performance analysis of soil-geopolymer deep mix column in soft soil under static and cyclic loading Runout of liquefaction-induced tailings dam failure: Influence of earthquake motions and residual strength Seismic performance and soil-structure interaction of shallow reinforced concrete tunnels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1