Evaluating the congestion-reducing effects of road rationing policy: Evidence from Jakarta’s odd-even policy

IF 3.3 Q3 TRANSPORTATION Case Studies on Transport Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101380
Muhammad Halley Yudhistira , Regi Kusumaatmadja , Yusuf Sofiyandi , Mochammad Firman Hidayat
{"title":"Evaluating the congestion-reducing effects of road rationing policy: Evidence from Jakarta’s odd-even policy","authors":"Muhammad Halley Yudhistira ,&nbsp;Regi Kusumaatmadja ,&nbsp;Yusuf Sofiyandi ,&nbsp;Mochammad Firman Hidayat","doi":"10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Travel demand restriction policies are becoming popular to reduce traffic jams in heavily congested urban areas. This paper evaluates the short-term impact of the odd–even number plate policy – a form of travel demand restriction –using Google Maps data on traffic congestion in Jakarta, one of the world’s most congested cities. The estimation result of hourly travel time data at road section levels shows that the odd–even policy statistically significantly reduced travel time by 3.0%, on average, during the first month of its implementation. The effect was higher – about 10% during the weekend and the weekly afternoon peak hours. The estimates were robust across various specifications, and no effect was found when looking for travel speed changes in untreated parts of the road network. This study also suggests that road users are likely to depart early in the morning to avoid the policy. The effect seems stagnant after the fourth week of the policy’s introduction. This study suggests that the odd–even number plate policy alone would be ineffective for the traffic congestion reduction agenda in Jakarta’s urban environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46989,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 101380"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X25000173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Travel demand restriction policies are becoming popular to reduce traffic jams in heavily congested urban areas. This paper evaluates the short-term impact of the odd–even number plate policy – a form of travel demand restriction –using Google Maps data on traffic congestion in Jakarta, one of the world’s most congested cities. The estimation result of hourly travel time data at road section levels shows that the odd–even policy statistically significantly reduced travel time by 3.0%, on average, during the first month of its implementation. The effect was higher – about 10% during the weekend and the weekly afternoon peak hours. The estimates were robust across various specifications, and no effect was found when looking for travel speed changes in untreated parts of the road network. This study also suggests that road users are likely to depart early in the morning to avoid the policy. The effect seems stagnant after the fourth week of the policy’s introduction. This study suggests that the odd–even number plate policy alone would be ineffective for the traffic congestion reduction agenda in Jakarta’s urban environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估道路配给政策的减少拥堵效果:来自雅加达单双号政策的证据
限制出行需求的政策越来越受欢迎,以减少严重拥堵的城市地区的交通堵塞。本文利用世界上最拥堵的城市之一雅加达的谷歌地图交通拥堵数据,评估了单双号车牌政策(一种出行需求限制形式)的短期影响。路段级别小时出行时间数据估算结果显示,单双号限行政策在实施的第一个月平均减少了3.0%的出行时间。在周末和每周的下午高峰时段,这种影响更大,约为10%。这些估计在各种规格下都是稳健的,当寻找未处理的道路网络部分的行驶速度变化时,没有发现任何影响。这项研究还表明,道路使用者可能会在清晨离开,以避免这项政策。在该政策出台的第四周后,效果似乎停滞不前。这项研究表明,单靠单双号车牌政策对雅加达城市环境中的交通拥堵减少议程是无效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
222
期刊最新文献
From gasoline to green: understanding the acceptance of electric motorcycles from the motorcyclists’ perspective – evidence from Tehran Connecting or dividing London? Evaluating the impact of the Elizabeth Line on job accessibility and spatial equity Simulation-based decision-making framework for sustainable intermodal transport including next-generation freight electric multiple-units Integrating non-motorized transportation with light rail transit: travel demand models for Rayong, Thailand Temporal heterogeneity in sociotechnical urban mobility systems: Evidence from distributed lag models in Curitiba, Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1