Does “animal” make the food better?--the effect of food type on food perception

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105379
Chenjing Wu , Lexin Su , Yuanxin Hu , Meng Qu , Hongyan Zhu , Yonghui Hou , Fuqun Liang , Yan Duan , Wei Zhang , Siyue Zhang , Xianyou He
{"title":"Does “animal” make the food better?--the effect of food type on food perception","authors":"Chenjing Wu ,&nbsp;Lexin Su ,&nbsp;Yuanxin Hu ,&nbsp;Meng Qu ,&nbsp;Hongyan Zhu ,&nbsp;Yonghui Hou ,&nbsp;Fuqun Liang ,&nbsp;Yan Duan ,&nbsp;Wei Zhang ,&nbsp;Siyue Zhang ,&nbsp;Xianyou He","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Animal shape has been widely used in the food industry. However, previous research has not provided clear conclusions regarding the impact of animal shape on food perception. Thus, the aim of this study is to further investigate the influence of food design types (animal shape) on food consumption, thereby addressing the research gap in existing literature regarding animal shape and food consumption.</div><div>In preliminary experiment, we utilized animal-shape cookies and non-animal-shape cookies. Participants were asked to taste the cookies on-site, rate the overall liking of taste perceptions, and indicate their eating intentions. Experiment 1a and 1b extended the research to include categorization of animals (edible and inedible). Experiment 2 then examined the role of animal shape, specifically investigating how the presence of eyes moderated the relationship between animal type and food perception.</div><div>Results from Preliminary experiment showed that participants rated the overall liking of taste perceptions and eating intentions significantly lower for the animal-shape cookies compared to the non-animal-shaped cookies. In Experiment 1a and 1b, participants only rated lower overall liking of taste perceptions and eating intentions for the inedible animal cookies. Experiment 2 further revealed the moderating effect of eye presence on the relationship between animal types and eating intentions. For non-edible animal shaped cookies, the presence of eye led to diminished eating intentions.</div><div>Overall, the study results indicate that food type does not positively enhance consumers' perception of food. Moreover, shape representing inedible animals elicits a more negative perception of food compared to shape depicting edible animals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 105379"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324002817","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Animal shape has been widely used in the food industry. However, previous research has not provided clear conclusions regarding the impact of animal shape on food perception. Thus, the aim of this study is to further investigate the influence of food design types (animal shape) on food consumption, thereby addressing the research gap in existing literature regarding animal shape and food consumption.
In preliminary experiment, we utilized animal-shape cookies and non-animal-shape cookies. Participants were asked to taste the cookies on-site, rate the overall liking of taste perceptions, and indicate their eating intentions. Experiment 1a and 1b extended the research to include categorization of animals (edible and inedible). Experiment 2 then examined the role of animal shape, specifically investigating how the presence of eyes moderated the relationship between animal type and food perception.
Results from Preliminary experiment showed that participants rated the overall liking of taste perceptions and eating intentions significantly lower for the animal-shape cookies compared to the non-animal-shaped cookies. In Experiment 1a and 1b, participants only rated lower overall liking of taste perceptions and eating intentions for the inedible animal cookies. Experiment 2 further revealed the moderating effect of eye presence on the relationship between animal types and eating intentions. For non-edible animal shaped cookies, the presence of eye led to diminished eating intentions.
Overall, the study results indicate that food type does not positively enhance consumers' perception of food. Moreover, shape representing inedible animals elicits a more negative perception of food compared to shape depicting edible animals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The taste of change? Free vegan meal boxes do not change meat consumption, self-efficacy, or attitudes toward a plant-based diet among meat eaters Exploring the buzz: The mediating role of entomophagy attitudes among younger generations towards pork from pigs fed with insect flour I smell it, I (do not) want it - the influence of food odor on inhibition in restrained and non-restrained eaters Rescue us all! the effects of the “rescued” claim for familiar and unfamiliar food ingredients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1