Does “animal” make the food better?--the effect of food type on food perception

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105379
Chenjing Wu , Lexin Su , Yuanxin Hu , Meng Qu , Hongyan Zhu , Yonghui Hou , Fuqun Liang , Yan Duan , Wei Zhang , Siyue Zhang , Xianyou He
{"title":"Does “animal” make the food better?--the effect of food type on food perception","authors":"Chenjing Wu ,&nbsp;Lexin Su ,&nbsp;Yuanxin Hu ,&nbsp;Meng Qu ,&nbsp;Hongyan Zhu ,&nbsp;Yonghui Hou ,&nbsp;Fuqun Liang ,&nbsp;Yan Duan ,&nbsp;Wei Zhang ,&nbsp;Siyue Zhang ,&nbsp;Xianyou He","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Animal shape has been widely used in the food industry. However, previous research has not provided clear conclusions regarding the impact of animal shape on food perception. Thus, the aim of this study is to further investigate the influence of food design types (animal shape) on food consumption, thereby addressing the research gap in existing literature regarding animal shape and food consumption.</div><div>In preliminary experiment, we utilized animal-shape cookies and non-animal-shape cookies. Participants were asked to taste the cookies on-site, rate the overall liking of taste perceptions, and indicate their eating intentions. Experiment 1a and 1b extended the research to include categorization of animals (edible and inedible). Experiment 2 then examined the role of animal shape, specifically investigating how the presence of eyes moderated the relationship between animal type and food perception.</div><div>Results from Preliminary experiment showed that participants rated the overall liking of taste perceptions and eating intentions significantly lower for the animal-shape cookies compared to the non-animal-shaped cookies. In Experiment 1a and 1b, participants only rated lower overall liking of taste perceptions and eating intentions for the inedible animal cookies. Experiment 2 further revealed the moderating effect of eye presence on the relationship between animal types and eating intentions. For non-edible animal shaped cookies, the presence of eye led to diminished eating intentions.</div><div>Overall, the study results indicate that food type does not positively enhance consumers' perception of food. Moreover, shape representing inedible animals elicits a more negative perception of food compared to shape depicting edible animals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 105379"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324002817","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Animal shape has been widely used in the food industry. However, previous research has not provided clear conclusions regarding the impact of animal shape on food perception. Thus, the aim of this study is to further investigate the influence of food design types (animal shape) on food consumption, thereby addressing the research gap in existing literature regarding animal shape and food consumption.
In preliminary experiment, we utilized animal-shape cookies and non-animal-shape cookies. Participants were asked to taste the cookies on-site, rate the overall liking of taste perceptions, and indicate their eating intentions. Experiment 1a and 1b extended the research to include categorization of animals (edible and inedible). Experiment 2 then examined the role of animal shape, specifically investigating how the presence of eyes moderated the relationship between animal type and food perception.
Results from Preliminary experiment showed that participants rated the overall liking of taste perceptions and eating intentions significantly lower for the animal-shape cookies compared to the non-animal-shaped cookies. In Experiment 1a and 1b, participants only rated lower overall liking of taste perceptions and eating intentions for the inedible animal cookies. Experiment 2 further revealed the moderating effect of eye presence on the relationship between animal types and eating intentions. For non-edible animal shaped cookies, the presence of eye led to diminished eating intentions.
Overall, the study results indicate that food type does not positively enhance consumers' perception of food. Moreover, shape representing inedible animals elicits a more negative perception of food compared to shape depicting edible animals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“动物”会使食物更好吗?——食物类型对食物感知的影响
动物造型在食品工业中得到了广泛的应用。然而,之前的研究并没有提供关于动物形状对食物感知的影响的明确结论。因此,本研究的目的是进一步探讨食品设计类型(动物形状)对食品消费的影响,从而弥补现有文献中关于动物形状和食品消费的研究空白。在初步实验中,我们使用了动物形状的饼干和非动物形状的饼干。参与者被要求在现场品尝饼干,对味道感知的总体喜好进行评分,并表明他们的食用意图。实验1a和1b扩展了研究,包括动物的分类(可食用和不可食用)。实验2考察了动物形状的作用,特别研究了眼睛的存在如何调节动物类型和食物感知之间的关系。初步实验结果表明,与非动物形状的饼干相比,参与者对动物形状饼干的味觉感知和食用意图的总体好感度明显较低。在实验1a和1b中,参与者对不可食用动物饼干的味觉感知和食用意图的总体好感度较低。实验2进一步揭示了眼睛存在对动物类型与进食意向关系的调节作用。对于不可食用的动物形状的饼干,眼睛的存在导致了食用意图的减少。总体而言,研究结果表明,食物类型对消费者对食物的感知并没有正面的提升作用。此外,与描绘可食用动物的形状相比,描绘不可食用动物的形状会引起人们对食物更负面的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
Effects of personality traits and context congruency on participant engagement in traditional central location tests and congruent versus incongruent digital immersive environments during affective product testing Sweetening the experience: How designed immersive multisensory environments modify yogurt taste and mouthfeel perception A cross-cultural study on the consumer perception and acceptance of grass-derived ingredients in Denmark and Austria Awareness without action? Consumer perceptions and more plant-based eating trends over time (2021, 2022, 2024) in Denmark Testing symmetry in three-response 2AFC: implications for two-alternative choice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1