Inter-pregnancy interval and uterine rupture during a trial of labour after one previous caesarean delivery and no previous vaginal births: a retrospective population-based cohort study.

IF 10 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2025-01-21 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103071
Pejman Adily, Travis Bettison, Mark Lauer, Rajit Narayan, Adam Mackie, Hala Phipps, Vincenzo Berghella, Marjan M Haghighi, Katelyn Perren, George Johnson, Bradley de Vries
{"title":"Inter-pregnancy interval and uterine rupture during a trial of labour after one previous caesarean delivery and no previous vaginal births: a retrospective population-based cohort study.","authors":"Pejman Adily, Travis Bettison, Mark Lauer, Rajit Narayan, Adam Mackie, Hala Phipps, Vincenzo Berghella, Marjan M Haghighi, Katelyn Perren, George Johnson, Bradley de Vries","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Short interpregnancy interval (IPI) following caesarean delivery is associated with uterine rupture in subsequent pregnancies. However, the interval required to minimise this risk is unknown. We investigated how the interval between pregnancies and induction or augmentation of labour affect the likelihood of uterine rupture among parturients with one previous livebirth by caesarean delivery who had a subsequent trial of labour.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this population-based cohort study, we used data from U.S National Vital Statistics System from 2011 to 2021. Multiple pregnancies and births of infants with congenital abnormalities were excluded. A linear spline logistic regression with one knot was used to assess the relationship between uterine rupture and interpregnancy interval for spontaneous and for induced/augmented labours. Multivariable logistic regression was performed with multiple imputation and stepwise backward elimination to adjust for maternal demographic and clinical factors including maternal age, height, and BMI and gestational age. The predicted risk of uterine rupture was tabulated for interpregnancy intervals between zero and 21 months. Adverse outcomes were compared between labours with and without uterine rupture.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We examined 491,998 trials of labour among parturients with one previous livebirth by caesarean delivery and no previous vaginal births. The odds ratio (OR) of uterine rupture per three months interpregnancy interval was 0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.94) between zero and 21 months after adjusting for confounders, with no further change in risk detected beyond 21 months. The OR was 2.51 (95% CI 2.27-2.78) for induced or augmented labours compared with spontaneous labours. Other factors associated with uterine rupture included older maternal age, shorter maternal height, more advanced gestational age (from 35 to 43 weeks), and heavier birthweight. Predicted rates of uterine rupture ranged from 0.36% at zero to 0.19% at 21 months' interpregnancy interval for spontaneous labours and from 0.91% to 0.47% for induced/augmented labours for parturients with a typical clinical and demographic background. When uterine rupture occurred, the rates of unplanned hysterectomy, intrapartum or neonatal death, and neonatal seizures were 4.0% (95% CI 3.2-5.1%), 3.7% (95% CI 2.7-5.1%), and 2.6% (95% CI 1.8-3.3%) respectively.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The risk of uterine rupture progressively decreases as IPI increases until about 21 months and then stabilises. Counselling should advise that for women choosing between a planned TOLAC or a planned caesarean delivery after one previous caesarean delivery and no previous vaginal births waiting until 21 months or longer after a prior low transverse caesarean delivery might minimise the risk of uterine rupture. The absolute risk of certain serious maternal and fetal/neonatal complications such as unplanned hysterectomy and perinatal death is low.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>No funding.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"80 ","pages":"103071"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11788787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103071","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Short interpregnancy interval (IPI) following caesarean delivery is associated with uterine rupture in subsequent pregnancies. However, the interval required to minimise this risk is unknown. We investigated how the interval between pregnancies and induction or augmentation of labour affect the likelihood of uterine rupture among parturients with one previous livebirth by caesarean delivery who had a subsequent trial of labour.

Methods: In this population-based cohort study, we used data from U.S National Vital Statistics System from 2011 to 2021. Multiple pregnancies and births of infants with congenital abnormalities were excluded. A linear spline logistic regression with one knot was used to assess the relationship between uterine rupture and interpregnancy interval for spontaneous and for induced/augmented labours. Multivariable logistic regression was performed with multiple imputation and stepwise backward elimination to adjust for maternal demographic and clinical factors including maternal age, height, and BMI and gestational age. The predicted risk of uterine rupture was tabulated for interpregnancy intervals between zero and 21 months. Adverse outcomes were compared between labours with and without uterine rupture.

Findings: We examined 491,998 trials of labour among parturients with one previous livebirth by caesarean delivery and no previous vaginal births. The odds ratio (OR) of uterine rupture per three months interpregnancy interval was 0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.94) between zero and 21 months after adjusting for confounders, with no further change in risk detected beyond 21 months. The OR was 2.51 (95% CI 2.27-2.78) for induced or augmented labours compared with spontaneous labours. Other factors associated with uterine rupture included older maternal age, shorter maternal height, more advanced gestational age (from 35 to 43 weeks), and heavier birthweight. Predicted rates of uterine rupture ranged from 0.36% at zero to 0.19% at 21 months' interpregnancy interval for spontaneous labours and from 0.91% to 0.47% for induced/augmented labours for parturients with a typical clinical and demographic background. When uterine rupture occurred, the rates of unplanned hysterectomy, intrapartum or neonatal death, and neonatal seizures were 4.0% (95% CI 3.2-5.1%), 3.7% (95% CI 2.7-5.1%), and 2.6% (95% CI 1.8-3.3%) respectively.

Interpretation: The risk of uterine rupture progressively decreases as IPI increases until about 21 months and then stabilises. Counselling should advise that for women choosing between a planned TOLAC or a planned caesarean delivery after one previous caesarean delivery and no previous vaginal births waiting until 21 months or longer after a prior low transverse caesarean delivery might minimise the risk of uterine rupture. The absolute risk of certain serious maternal and fetal/neonatal complications such as unplanned hysterectomy and perinatal death is low.

Funding: No funding.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠期间隔和子宫破裂的分娩试验后,既往一次剖腹产和既往无阴道分娩:回顾性人群为基础的队列研究。
背景:剖宫产后的短解释间隔(IPI)与随后妊娠的子宫破裂有关。然而,最小化这种风险所需的时间间隔尚不清楚。我们调查了怀孕和引产或增产之间的间隔如何影响子宫破裂的可能性,其中有一个以前的活产剖腹产分娩后,有随后的试产。方法:在这项基于人群的队列研究中,我们使用了2011年至2021年美国国家生命统计系统的数据。排除多胎妊娠和先天性畸形婴儿的出生。采用一节线性样条逻辑回归来评估子宫破裂与自然分娩和引产/扩增分娩的解释间隔之间的关系。采用多变量logistic回归,采用多重归算和逐步倒推剔除,调整产妇人口统计学和临床因素,包括产妇年龄、身高、BMI和胎龄。子宫破裂的预测风险以0 - 21个月的解释间隔为表。不良后果的产程比较有和没有子宫破裂。研究结果:我们检查了491,998项分娩试验,其中包括一次剖腹产分娩和没有阴道分娩的产妇。调整混杂因素后,0 - 21个月子宫破裂每3个月解释间隔的比值比(OR)为0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.94), 21个月后未发现进一步的风险变化。与自然分娩相比,引产或增产的OR为2.51 (95% CI 2.27-2.78)。与子宫破裂相关的其他因素包括母亲年龄较大,母亲身高较矮,孕龄较早(从35周到43周)和出生体重较重。对于具有典型临床和人口统计学背景的产妇,子宫破裂的预测率从0 - 0.36%到21个月解释间隔时的0.19%,而对于引产/扩增产,子宫破裂的预测率从0.91%到0.47%。发生子宫破裂时,意外子宫切除术、产时或新生儿死亡和新生儿癫痫的发生率分别为4.0% (95% CI 3.2-5.1%)、3.7% (95% CI 2.7-5.1%)和2.6% (95% CI 1.8-3.3%)。解释:子宫破裂的风险随着IPI的增加而逐渐降低,直到大约21个月后才趋于稳定。咨询人员应建议,对于选择计划TOLAC或计划剖宫产的妇女,在一次剖宫产后选择计划剖宫产,而在之前低横断面剖宫产后21个月或更长时间才进行阴道分娩,可以最大限度地降低子宫破裂的风险。某些严重的产妇和胎儿/新生儿并发症,如计划外子宫切除术和围产期死亡的绝对风险很低。资金:没有资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Post-acute sequelae after Nipah virus infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurological and neurodevelopmental outcomes in neonates and children after maternal chikungunya infection in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intraoperative allogeneic packed red blood cell transfusions and postoperative delirium: a retrospective cohort study in the USA. Digital illiteracy and access to remote patient monitoring in oncology: a multicentre study of healthcare providers' perceptions and patient-reported digital literacy. Assessing the feasibility of a co-produced peer-group intervention for supporting wellbeing during the transition to adulthood among autistic 16-25-year-olds (ATAG): a randomised controlled feasibility trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1