Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse outcomes following planned birth at 39 weeks versus expectant management in low-risk women: a population based cohort study.

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2025-01-25 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103076
Kylie Crawford, Waldemar A Carlo, Anthony Odibo, Aris Papageorghiou, William Tarnow-Mordi, Sailesh Kumar
{"title":"Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse outcomes following planned birth at 39 weeks versus expectant management in low-risk women: a population based cohort study.","authors":"Kylie Crawford, Waldemar A Carlo, Anthony Odibo, Aris Papageorghiou, William Tarnow-Mordi, Sailesh Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Planned birth by induction of labour in low-risk, nulliparous women at 39<sup>+0</sup>-39<sup>+6</sup> weeks gestation is associated with fewer caesarean sections, adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes and perinatal deaths compared with expectant management. However, the consequences of scheduled caesarean section in these women at this gestation are unclear. We compared outcomes following planned birth at 39<sup>+0</sup>-39<sup>+6</sup> weeks gestation (either by induction of labour or scheduled caesarean section) to expectant management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The population included low-risk, singleton pregnancies between 2000 and 2021 in Queensland, Australia. Study outcomes were perinatal mortality (antepartum or intrapartum stillbirth and neonatal death), severe neonatal neurological morbidity and non-neurological morbidity, severe maternal outcome, maternal-infant separation, perineal trauma, shoulder dystocia, and caesarean birth. Multivariable models were built to determine risks of adverse outcomes for planned birth compared to expectant management. Subgroup analyses according to parity and birthweight were also performed. We calculated the number of planned births required that were associated with one less adverse outcome.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In 472,520 low-risk pregnancies, planned birth at 39<sup>+0</sup>-39<sup>+6</sup> weeks occurred in 97,438 (20.6%) women, of whom 39,697 (40.7%) underwent induction of labour and 57,741 (59.3%) had scheduled caesarean delivery. Planned birth was associated with 52% lower odds of perinatal mortality (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 0.48; 95% CI 0.30, 0.76, p = 0.002), 62% lower odds of antepartum stillbirth (aOR 0.38; 95% CI 0.15, 0.97, p = 0.04), and 84% lower odds of intrapartum stillbirth by (aOR 0.16; 95% CI 0.04, 0.66, p = 0.01). It was also associated with reduction in the odds of severe neurological morbidity (aOR 0.46; 95% CI 0.39, 0.53, p = 0.00004), severe non-neurological morbidity (aOR 0.65; 95% CI 0.62, 0.68, p = 0.00004), and severe maternal outcome (aOR 0.95; 95% CI 0.92, 0.99, p = 0.008) but not maternal-infant separation (aOR 1.04; 95% CI 1.00, 1.08, p = 0.08). The reduction in odds for perinatal mortality, severe neurological, and non-neurological morbidity was greatest for birth by scheduled caesarean section. Compared to expectant management, planned birth by induction of labour was associated with reduced odds of caesarean delivery (aOR 0.54; 95% CI 0.51, 0.58, p = 0.00004), severe perineal trauma (aOR 0.53; 95% CI 0.45, 0.63, p = 0.00004), and shoulder dystocia (aOR 0.73; 95% CI 0.64, 0.84, p = 0.00004). Planned delivery of 2278 (95% CI 1760, 3231) women is associated with a reduction in one case of perinatal death, however significantly lower numbers are required for the other outcomes.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Planned birth at 39<sup>+0</sup>-39<sup>+6</sup> weeks in low-risk women was associated with lower odds of perinatal mortality and other adverse outcomes. Reductions in odds of adverse outcome were greater following scheduled caesarean section than induction of labour. Compared to expectant management, induction of labour was associated with lower odds of severe perineal trauma, shoulder dystocia, and caesarean birth. These findings generate further hypotheses that need to be tested in adequately powered randomised controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This study was supported by funds from the National Health and Medical Research Council and Mater Foundation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"80 ","pages":"103076"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11803212/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103076","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Planned birth by induction of labour in low-risk, nulliparous women at 39+0-39+6 weeks gestation is associated with fewer caesarean sections, adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes and perinatal deaths compared with expectant management. However, the consequences of scheduled caesarean section in these women at this gestation are unclear. We compared outcomes following planned birth at 39+0-39+6 weeks gestation (either by induction of labour or scheduled caesarean section) to expectant management.

Methods: The population included low-risk, singleton pregnancies between 2000 and 2021 in Queensland, Australia. Study outcomes were perinatal mortality (antepartum or intrapartum stillbirth and neonatal death), severe neonatal neurological morbidity and non-neurological morbidity, severe maternal outcome, maternal-infant separation, perineal trauma, shoulder dystocia, and caesarean birth. Multivariable models were built to determine risks of adverse outcomes for planned birth compared to expectant management. Subgroup analyses according to parity and birthweight were also performed. We calculated the number of planned births required that were associated with one less adverse outcome.

Findings: In 472,520 low-risk pregnancies, planned birth at 39+0-39+6 weeks occurred in 97,438 (20.6%) women, of whom 39,697 (40.7%) underwent induction of labour and 57,741 (59.3%) had scheduled caesarean delivery. Planned birth was associated with 52% lower odds of perinatal mortality (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 0.48; 95% CI 0.30, 0.76, p = 0.002), 62% lower odds of antepartum stillbirth (aOR 0.38; 95% CI 0.15, 0.97, p = 0.04), and 84% lower odds of intrapartum stillbirth by (aOR 0.16; 95% CI 0.04, 0.66, p = 0.01). It was also associated with reduction in the odds of severe neurological morbidity (aOR 0.46; 95% CI 0.39, 0.53, p = 0.00004), severe non-neurological morbidity (aOR 0.65; 95% CI 0.62, 0.68, p = 0.00004), and severe maternal outcome (aOR 0.95; 95% CI 0.92, 0.99, p = 0.008) but not maternal-infant separation (aOR 1.04; 95% CI 1.00, 1.08, p = 0.08). The reduction in odds for perinatal mortality, severe neurological, and non-neurological morbidity was greatest for birth by scheduled caesarean section. Compared to expectant management, planned birth by induction of labour was associated with reduced odds of caesarean delivery (aOR 0.54; 95% CI 0.51, 0.58, p = 0.00004), severe perineal trauma (aOR 0.53; 95% CI 0.45, 0.63, p = 0.00004), and shoulder dystocia (aOR 0.73; 95% CI 0.64, 0.84, p = 0.00004). Planned delivery of 2278 (95% CI 1760, 3231) women is associated with a reduction in one case of perinatal death, however significantly lower numbers are required for the other outcomes.

Interpretation: Planned birth at 39+0-39+6 weeks in low-risk women was associated with lower odds of perinatal mortality and other adverse outcomes. Reductions in odds of adverse outcome were greater following scheduled caesarean section than induction of labour. Compared to expectant management, induction of labour was associated with lower odds of severe perineal trauma, shoulder dystocia, and caesarean birth. These findings generate further hypotheses that need to be tested in adequately powered randomised controlled trials.

Funding: This study was supported by funds from the National Health and Medical Research Council and Mater Foundation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum for "The global birth prevalence of clubfoot: a systematic review and meta-analysis". Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse outcomes following planned birth at 39 weeks versus expectant management in low-risk women: a population based cohort study. Monitoring of prostate cancer screening in the European Union: development of key performance indicators through the PRAISE-U project. Development and validation of an explainable machine learning model for mortality prediction among patients with infected pancreatic necrosis. Real-world outcomes of the CROSS regimen in patients with resectable esophageal or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1