Type-2 innate signals are dispensable for skeletal muscle regeneration and pathology linked to Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

IF 6.5 1区生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY EMBO Reports Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1038/s44319-025-00383-y

Melina Messing, Marine Theret, Michael R Hughes, Jiaqi Wu, Omar Husain Syed, Fang Fang Li, Yicong Li, Fabio M V Rossi, Kelly M McNagny

{"title":"Type-2 innate signals are dispensable for skeletal muscle regeneration and pathology linked to Duchenne muscular dystrophy.","authors":"Melina Messing, Marine Theret, Michael R Hughes, Jiaqi Wu, Omar Husain Syed, Fang Fang Li, Yicong Li, Fabio M V Rossi, Kelly M McNagny","doi":"10.1038/s44319-025-00383-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immune responses play an integral role in skeletal muscle regeneration. In the genetically inherited muscle disease Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), muscle regeneration is disrupted, leading to chronic inflammation, fibrosis, and early mortality. Previously, it has been suggested that type-2 innate immune cells, particularly eosinophils and their production of IL-4, play an essential role in effective muscle regeneration after acute injury. We here re-investigate the role of eosinophils in skeletal muscle repair using mice deficient in eosinophils (ΔdblGATA), or deficient in IL-4R/IL-13R signaling through STAT6 (Stat6-/-). We show that neither deficiency has an impact on skeletal muscle regeneration in response to acute injury as quantified by fiber size, immune cell infiltration, or muscle-resident stem cell proliferation. We also investigate the role of STAT6 signaling in mdx:Stat6-/- mice, a model of DMD and, again, find that ablation of STAT6 signaling has no effect on the rate or severity of fibrotic scar formation or disease progression. In contrast to previous models, our data suggest a negligible role for eosinophils and STAT6 signaling in skeletal muscle regeneration after acute or chronic injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":11541,"journal":{"name":"EMBO Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EMBO Reports","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44319-025-00383-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Immune responses play an integral role in skeletal muscle regeneration. In the genetically inherited muscle disease Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), muscle regeneration is disrupted, leading to chronic inflammation, fibrosis, and early mortality. Previously, it has been suggested that type-2 innate immune cells, particularly eosinophils and their production of IL-4, play an essential role in effective muscle regeneration after acute injury. We here re-investigate the role of eosinophils in skeletal muscle repair using mice deficient in eosinophils (ΔdblGATA), or deficient in IL-4R/IL-13R signaling through STAT6 (Stat6-/-). We show that neither deficiency has an impact on skeletal muscle regeneration in response to acute injury as quantified by fiber size, immune cell infiltration, or muscle-resident stem cell proliferation. We also investigate the role of STAT6 signaling in mdx:Stat6-/- mice, a model of DMD and, again, find that ablation of STAT6 signaling has no effect on the rate or severity of fibrotic scar formation or disease progression. In contrast to previous models, our data suggest a negligible role for eosinophils and STAT6 signaling in skeletal muscle regeneration after acute or chronic injury.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

EMBO Reports 生物-生化与分子生物学

CiteScore

11.20

自引率

1.30%

发文量

267

审稿时长

1 months

期刊介绍： EMBO Reports is a scientific journal that specializes in publishing research articles in the fields of molecular biology, cell biology, and developmental biology. The journal is known for its commitment to publishing high-quality, impactful research that provides novel physiological and functional insights. These insights are expected to be supported by robust evidence, with independent lines of inquiry validating the findings. The journal's scope includes both long and short-format papers, catering to different types of research contributions. It values studies that: Communicate major findings: Articles that report significant discoveries or advancements in the understanding of biological processes at the molecular, cellular, and developmental levels. Confirm important findings: Research that validates or supports existing knowledge in the field, reinforcing the reliability of previous studies. Refute prominent claims: Studies that challenge or disprove widely accepted ideas or hypotheses in the biosciences, contributing to the correction and evolution of scientific understanding. Present null data: Papers that report negative results or findings that do not support a particular hypothesis, which are crucial for the scientific process as they help to refine or redirect research efforts. EMBO Reports is dedicated to maintaining high standards of scientific rigor and integrity, ensuring that the research it publishes contributes meaningfully to the advancement of knowledge in the life sciences. By covering a broad spectrum of topics and encouraging the publication of both positive and negative results, the journal plays a vital role in promoting a comprehensive and balanced view of scientific inquiry.