Users' Perspectives of Direct-to-Consumer Telemedicine Services: Survey Study.

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR Formative Research Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.2196/68619
Kate Churruca, Darran Foo, Andrew Turner, Emily Crameri, Maree Saba, Samantha Spanos, Matthew Vickers, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Louise A Ellis
{"title":"Users' Perspectives of Direct-to-Consumer Telemedicine Services: Survey Study.","authors":"Kate Churruca, Darran Foo, Andrew Turner, Emily Crameri, Maree Saba, Samantha Spanos, Matthew Vickers, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Louise A Ellis","doi":"10.2196/68619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Commercially run direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine services are on the rise in countries such as Australia and the United States. These include DTC services that are web-based, largely asynchronous, and offer targeted treatment pathways for specific health issues (eg, weight loss or sexual function). It has been argued that DTC telemedicine improves access to health care and promotes patient empowerment. Despite research examining quality and safety issues, little is known about users' reasons for accessing DTC telemedicine services or their perceptions of them.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we aimed to examine the perspectives of Australian users accessing DTC telemedicine services, including the reasons for use, perceived benefits, and concerns, in addition to their usage and interaction with traditional general practice services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based cross-sectional survey including questions on demographics, published and validated scales, and author-developed closed- and open-response questions was administered via REDCap in 2023 to Australian adults accessing DTC telemedicine services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 151 respondents, most (136/151, 90.1%) had seen a general practitioner (GP) in the previous 12 months and were somewhat or very satisfied (118/136, 86.8%) with the care, just over half found it easy to get an appointment with their GP (76/151, 50.3%), and a quarter found it difficult (38/151, 25.2%). Among the 136 respondents who had seen a GP, more than half either \"never\" (55/136, 40.4%) or \"rarely\" (23/136, 16.9%) discussed the information and treatment received from DTC telemedicine service with their GP. The majority of respondents were using a DTC telemedicine service offering prescription skin care (92/151, 60.9%), had received treatment in the previous 6 months (123/151, 81.5%), and had self-initiated care (128/151, 84.8%). The most frequently cited reasons for using DTC telemedicine were related to convenience (97/121, 80.2%) and flexibility (71/121, 58.7%), while approximately a third of the sample selected that it was difficult to see traditional health care provider in their preferred time frame (44/121, 36.4%) and that the use of DTC telemedicine allowed them to gain access to services otherwise unavailable through traditional health care (39/121, 32.2%). Most participants felt \"more in control\" (106/128, 82.9%) and \"in charge\" of their health concern (102/130, 78.5%) when using DTC telemedicine services, in addition to having \"more correct knowledge\" (92/128, 71.9%) and \"feeling better informed as a patient\" (94/131, 71.8%). \"Costs of services\" (40/115, 34.8%) and \"privacy\" (31/115, 27%) were the most frequently reported concerns with using digital health care technologies such as DTC telemedicine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We report that most users perceive DTC telemedicine services as offering ease of access and convenience, and that their use contributes to a greater sense of empowerment over their health. Concerns were related to data privacy and the costs of utilizing the services. Responses suggest that DTC telemedicine may be tapping into a previously unmet need, rather than complementing traditional health care provided by a GP.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e68619"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809934/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/68619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Commercially run direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine services are on the rise in countries such as Australia and the United States. These include DTC services that are web-based, largely asynchronous, and offer targeted treatment pathways for specific health issues (eg, weight loss or sexual function). It has been argued that DTC telemedicine improves access to health care and promotes patient empowerment. Despite research examining quality and safety issues, little is known about users' reasons for accessing DTC telemedicine services or their perceptions of them.

Objective: In this study, we aimed to examine the perspectives of Australian users accessing DTC telemedicine services, including the reasons for use, perceived benefits, and concerns, in addition to their usage and interaction with traditional general practice services.

Methods: A web-based cross-sectional survey including questions on demographics, published and validated scales, and author-developed closed- and open-response questions was administered via REDCap in 2023 to Australian adults accessing DTC telemedicine services.

Results: Among the 151 respondents, most (136/151, 90.1%) had seen a general practitioner (GP) in the previous 12 months and were somewhat or very satisfied (118/136, 86.8%) with the care, just over half found it easy to get an appointment with their GP (76/151, 50.3%), and a quarter found it difficult (38/151, 25.2%). Among the 136 respondents who had seen a GP, more than half either "never" (55/136, 40.4%) or "rarely" (23/136, 16.9%) discussed the information and treatment received from DTC telemedicine service with their GP. The majority of respondents were using a DTC telemedicine service offering prescription skin care (92/151, 60.9%), had received treatment in the previous 6 months (123/151, 81.5%), and had self-initiated care (128/151, 84.8%). The most frequently cited reasons for using DTC telemedicine were related to convenience (97/121, 80.2%) and flexibility (71/121, 58.7%), while approximately a third of the sample selected that it was difficult to see traditional health care provider in their preferred time frame (44/121, 36.4%) and that the use of DTC telemedicine allowed them to gain access to services otherwise unavailable through traditional health care (39/121, 32.2%). Most participants felt "more in control" (106/128, 82.9%) and "in charge" of their health concern (102/130, 78.5%) when using DTC telemedicine services, in addition to having "more correct knowledge" (92/128, 71.9%) and "feeling better informed as a patient" (94/131, 71.8%). "Costs of services" (40/115, 34.8%) and "privacy" (31/115, 27%) were the most frequently reported concerns with using digital health care technologies such as DTC telemedicine.

Conclusions: We report that most users perceive DTC telemedicine services as offering ease of access and convenience, and that their use contributes to a greater sense of empowerment over their health. Concerns were related to data privacy and the costs of utilizing the services. Responses suggest that DTC telemedicine may be tapping into a previously unmet need, rather than complementing traditional health care provided by a GP.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直接面向消费者的远程医疗服务的用户视角:调查研究。
背景:商业运营的直接面向消费者(DTC)远程医疗服务在澳大利亚和美国等国家呈上升趋势。其中包括基于网络的DTC服务,基本上是异步的,并为特定的健康问题(如减肥或性功能)提供有针对性的治疗途径。有人认为,DTC远程医疗改善了获得医疗保健的机会,并促进了患者赋权。尽管对质量和安全问题进行了研究,但人们对用户使用DTC远程医疗服务的原因或他们对这些服务的看法知之甚少。目的:在本研究中,我们旨在研究澳大利亚用户访问DTC远程医疗服务的观点,包括使用的原因、感知的好处和关注的问题,以及他们与传统全科医生服务的使用和互动。方法:在2023年,通过REDCap对使用DTC远程医疗服务的澳大利亚成年人进行了一项基于网络的横断面调查,包括人口统计学问题、已发表和已验证的量表以及作者开发的封闭式和开放式回答问题。结果:151名被调查者中,大多数(136/ 151,90.1%)在过去12个月内看过全科医生,对全科医生的护理感到满意或非常满意(118/ 136,86.8%),略多于一半的人认为与全科医生预约很容易(76/ 151,50.3%),四分之一的人认为很难(38/ 151,25.2%)。在136名看过全科医生的受访者中,超过一半的人“从未”(55/136,40.4%)或“很少”(23/136,16.9%)与全科医生讨论从DTC远程医疗服务中获得的信息和治疗。大多数受访者使用DTC远程医疗服务提供处方皮肤护理(92/151,60.9%),前6个月接受过治疗(123/151,81.5%),主动护理(128/151,84.8%)。使用DTC远程医疗的最常见原因与便利性(97/121,80.2%)和灵活性(71/121,58.7%)有关,而大约三分之一的样本选择难以在他们喜欢的时间框架内看到传统医疗保健提供者(44/121,36.4%),使用DTC远程医疗使他们能够获得传统医疗保健无法获得的服务(39/121,32.2%)。大多数参与者在使用DTC远程医疗服务时,除了拥有“更正确的知识”(92/128,71.9%)和“作为患者感觉更了解情况”(94/131,71.8%)外,还感到“更能控制”(106/128,82.9%)和“负责”自己的健康问题(102/130,78.5%)。“服务成本”(40/115,34.8%)和“隐私”(31/115,27%)是使用DTC远程医疗等数字医疗技术时最常被报告的问题。结论:我们报告说,大多数用户认为DTC远程医疗服务提供了易于访问和方便的服务,并且它们的使用有助于增强对其健康的赋权感。人们关注的是数据隐私和使用这些服务的成本。回应表明,DTC远程医疗可能是利用了以前未满足的需求,而不是对全科医生提供的传统医疗保健的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Performance of DeepSeek V3, DeepSeek R1, ChatGPT 4o, and ChatGPT o1 on the National Health Professional and Technical Qualification Examination (Intermediate Level) in China: Comparative Analysis. Development and Evaluation of a German Suicide Prevention Website for Men: Exploratory Study. Evaluation of GPT-5 in Periodontitis Staging and Grading: Retrospective Observational Study. Validity of Smartphone-Based Measurement for Assessing Lower Limb Power for Sarcopenia and Frailty Discrimination: Cross-Sectional Study. Screening the Digital Skills of Patients in Geriatric Rehabilitation: Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1