{"title":"Effects of substrate on ecophysiology of young silver fir and Norway spruce growing on shallow calcareous soils","authors":"L. Leyerer, K. Katzensteiner","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Regeneration of mixed mountain forests after disturbances frequently fails due to causes like seed limitation, unfavorable microclimate, competition and ungulate browsing. Due to water and nutrient limitations, shallow soils on dolomite and limestone bedrock constitute a challenge for artificial regeneration. A thorough understanding of the interaction between substrate and tree ecophysiology and the suitability of various tree species for such unfavorable sites is of ultimate importance for post-disturbance regeneration management of protective forests, which have faced dramatically accelerated disturbance regimes during recent decades. Hence, this study compares the effect of soil substrate on the performance of young silver fir (<em>Abies alba</em> Mill.) and Norway spruce (<em>Picea abies</em> Karst.) by analyzing the interaction between tree ecophysiology and soil conditions at two windthrow sites on dolomite and limestone. On both sites, silver fir and Norway spruce suffered from foliar nutrient deficiencies. For both species, soil nutrient content as well as photosynthetic and growth rates were higher on limestone than on dolomite. Silver fir showed lower photosynthetic rates on both dolomite and limestone. While fir stayed smaller than spruce on limestone, it showed slightly better recent shoot growth on dolomite. Mycorrhization was higher on limestone. There was a tendency of higher fine root mass density and higher ectomycorrhizal root colonization of silver fir in the mineral soil developed from dolomite, compared to Norway spruce. These results reflect the central role of substrate and nutrition for tree growth and development and indicate better ecophysiological performance for both species on limestone than on dolomite. Our findings suggest better adaption of silver fir to unfavorable soil conditions due to different root characteristics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"578 ","pages":"Article 122477"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724007898","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Regeneration of mixed mountain forests after disturbances frequently fails due to causes like seed limitation, unfavorable microclimate, competition and ungulate browsing. Due to water and nutrient limitations, shallow soils on dolomite and limestone bedrock constitute a challenge for artificial regeneration. A thorough understanding of the interaction between substrate and tree ecophysiology and the suitability of various tree species for such unfavorable sites is of ultimate importance for post-disturbance regeneration management of protective forests, which have faced dramatically accelerated disturbance regimes during recent decades. Hence, this study compares the effect of soil substrate on the performance of young silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) by analyzing the interaction between tree ecophysiology and soil conditions at two windthrow sites on dolomite and limestone. On both sites, silver fir and Norway spruce suffered from foliar nutrient deficiencies. For both species, soil nutrient content as well as photosynthetic and growth rates were higher on limestone than on dolomite. Silver fir showed lower photosynthetic rates on both dolomite and limestone. While fir stayed smaller than spruce on limestone, it showed slightly better recent shoot growth on dolomite. Mycorrhization was higher on limestone. There was a tendency of higher fine root mass density and higher ectomycorrhizal root colonization of silver fir in the mineral soil developed from dolomite, compared to Norway spruce. These results reflect the central role of substrate and nutrition for tree growth and development and indicate better ecophysiological performance for both species on limestone than on dolomite. Our findings suggest better adaption of silver fir to unfavorable soil conditions due to different root characteristics.
由于种子限制、不利的小气候、竞争和有蹄动物的啃食等原因,干扰后的混交林更新常常失败。由于水和养分的限制,白云岩和石灰岩基岩上的浅层土壤对人工再生构成了挑战。深入了解基材和树木生态生理之间的相互作用以及各种树种对这些不利地点的适应性,对于近几十年来面临急剧加速的干扰制度的防护林的干扰后更新管理至关重要。因此,本研究通过分析在白云岩和石灰石上两个风场树木生态生理与土壤条件的相互作用,比较土壤基质对幼龄银冷杉(Abies alba Mill.)和挪威云杉(Picea Abies Karst.)生长性能的影响。在这两个地点,银杉和挪威云杉遭受叶片营养缺乏。两种植物的土壤养分含量、光合速率和生长速率在石灰岩上均高于白云岩。银杉在白云岩和石灰岩上的光合速率均较低。虽然冷杉在石灰岩上比云杉小,但它在白云岩上的新梢生长略好。灰岩菌根增多。与挪威云杉相比,在白云岩形成的矿质土壤中,银杉有较高的细根质量密度和较高的外生菌根定植的趋势。这些结果反映了基质和营养对树木生长发育的核心作用,并表明石灰石上和白云石上两种树种的生态生理性能都优于白云石。我们的研究结果表明,由于不同的根系特征,银杉对不利的土壤条件有更好的适应能力。
期刊介绍:
Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world.
A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers.
We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include:
1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests;
2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management;
3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023);
4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript.
The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.