Effects of substrate on ecophysiology of young silver fir and Norway spruce growing on shallow calcareous soils

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Forest Ecology and Management Pub Date : 2025-02-15 Epub Date: 2024-12-25 DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122477
L. Leyerer, K. Katzensteiner
{"title":"Effects of substrate on ecophysiology of young silver fir and Norway spruce growing on shallow calcareous soils","authors":"L. Leyerer,&nbsp;K. Katzensteiner","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Regeneration of mixed mountain forests after disturbances frequently fails due to causes like seed limitation, unfavorable microclimate, competition and ungulate browsing. Due to water and nutrient limitations, shallow soils on dolomite and limestone bedrock constitute a challenge for artificial regeneration. A thorough understanding of the interaction between substrate and tree ecophysiology and the suitability of various tree species for such unfavorable sites is of ultimate importance for post-disturbance regeneration management of protective forests, which have faced dramatically accelerated disturbance regimes during recent decades. Hence, this study compares the effect of soil substrate on the performance of young silver fir (<em>Abies alba</em> Mill.) and Norway spruce (<em>Picea abies</em> Karst.) by analyzing the interaction between tree ecophysiology and soil conditions at two windthrow sites on dolomite and limestone. On both sites, silver fir and Norway spruce suffered from foliar nutrient deficiencies. For both species, soil nutrient content as well as photosynthetic and growth rates were higher on limestone than on dolomite. Silver fir showed lower photosynthetic rates on both dolomite and limestone. While fir stayed smaller than spruce on limestone, it showed slightly better recent shoot growth on dolomite. Mycorrhization was higher on limestone. There was a tendency of higher fine root mass density and higher ectomycorrhizal root colonization of silver fir in the mineral soil developed from dolomite, compared to Norway spruce. These results reflect the central role of substrate and nutrition for tree growth and development and indicate better ecophysiological performance for both species on limestone than on dolomite. Our findings suggest better adaption of silver fir to unfavorable soil conditions due to different root characteristics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"578 ","pages":"Article 122477"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724007898","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regeneration of mixed mountain forests after disturbances frequently fails due to causes like seed limitation, unfavorable microclimate, competition and ungulate browsing. Due to water and nutrient limitations, shallow soils on dolomite and limestone bedrock constitute a challenge for artificial regeneration. A thorough understanding of the interaction between substrate and tree ecophysiology and the suitability of various tree species for such unfavorable sites is of ultimate importance for post-disturbance regeneration management of protective forests, which have faced dramatically accelerated disturbance regimes during recent decades. Hence, this study compares the effect of soil substrate on the performance of young silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) by analyzing the interaction between tree ecophysiology and soil conditions at two windthrow sites on dolomite and limestone. On both sites, silver fir and Norway spruce suffered from foliar nutrient deficiencies. For both species, soil nutrient content as well as photosynthetic and growth rates were higher on limestone than on dolomite. Silver fir showed lower photosynthetic rates on both dolomite and limestone. While fir stayed smaller than spruce on limestone, it showed slightly better recent shoot growth on dolomite. Mycorrhization was higher on limestone. There was a tendency of higher fine root mass density and higher ectomycorrhizal root colonization of silver fir in the mineral soil developed from dolomite, compared to Norway spruce. These results reflect the central role of substrate and nutrition for tree growth and development and indicate better ecophysiological performance for both species on limestone than on dolomite. Our findings suggest better adaption of silver fir to unfavorable soil conditions due to different root characteristics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基质对浅钙化土壤上生长的银杉和挪威云杉幼树生理生态的影响
由于种子限制、不利的小气候、竞争和有蹄动物的啃食等原因,干扰后的混交林更新常常失败。由于水和养分的限制,白云岩和石灰岩基岩上的浅层土壤对人工再生构成了挑战。深入了解基材和树木生态生理之间的相互作用以及各种树种对这些不利地点的适应性,对于近几十年来面临急剧加速的干扰制度的防护林的干扰后更新管理至关重要。因此,本研究通过分析在白云岩和石灰石上两个风场树木生态生理与土壤条件的相互作用,比较土壤基质对幼龄银冷杉(Abies alba Mill.)和挪威云杉(Picea Abies Karst.)生长性能的影响。在这两个地点,银杉和挪威云杉遭受叶片营养缺乏。两种植物的土壤养分含量、光合速率和生长速率在石灰岩上均高于白云岩。银杉在白云岩和石灰岩上的光合速率均较低。虽然冷杉在石灰岩上比云杉小,但它在白云岩上的新梢生长略好。灰岩菌根增多。与挪威云杉相比,在白云岩形成的矿质土壤中,银杉有较高的细根质量密度和较高的外生菌根定植的趋势。这些结果反映了基质和营养对树木生长发育的核心作用,并表明石灰石上和白云石上两种树种的生态生理性能都优于白云石。我们的研究结果表明,由于不同的根系特征,银杉对不利的土壤条件有更好的适应能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.80%
发文量
665
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world. A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers. We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include: 1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests; 2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management; 3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023); 4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript. The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the dynamic impacts of tree, stand, and climatic factors on individual tree mortality using survival analysis Wood substrate and light availability shape microbial community composition, function, and interactions of downed logs in karst forests Spatial patterns and environmental associations of soil nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry in China’s forests Ant pruning and weak tussock facilitation jointly shape planted sapling performance along an elevation gradient Functional trait filtering of aerial insectivorous forest bats in Amazonian cattle-dominated landscapes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1