Fine-scale interventions can reinforce the forest character of the understory vegetation – The effects of different artificial gaps in an oak-dominated forest
Flóra Tinya , Péter Csépányi , Csenge Veronika Horváth , Bence Kovács , Csaba Németh , Péter Ódor
{"title":"Fine-scale interventions can reinforce the forest character of the understory vegetation – The effects of different artificial gaps in an oak-dominated forest","authors":"Flóra Tinya , Péter Csépányi , Csenge Veronika Horváth , Bence Kovács , Csaba Németh , Péter Ódor","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forest biodiversity is threatened by the use of conventional rotation forestry system, while fine-scale interventions of continuous cover forestry, such as gap-cutting, could protect forest habitats and enhance the stand structural heterogeneity. Consequently, their use could maintain biodiversity during the timber production process. It is unclear which gap sizes and shapes can trigger ample natural regeneration while simultaneously maintaining or improving the near-natural character of the understory. The Pilis Gap Experiment examined the five-year effects of four gap types comparing two gap sizes (150 and 300 m<sup>2</sup>) and two gap shapes (circular and elongated) on the light and soil moisture conditions and understory vegetation in an oak–hornbeam forest. The investigated understory variables included species richness, total cover, height, shrub cover and cover of five functional groups. Our results indicate an initially increased light in all gap types, but later it decreased in large circular gaps, while remaining more stable in other gap types. Soil moisture increased first, transiently in the circular gaps, and later in the elongated gaps. Species richness temporarily increased in large circular gaps, whereas total cover increased in all gap types. Understory height and shrub cover also increased in large circular gaps. Annual and perennial forb cover remained unchanged in all gap types, although graminoid cover showed transient growth in large elongated gaps. Small gaps had the highest cover of woody seedlings, whereas bramble (<em>Rubus fruticosus</em> agg.) cover increased the most in large circular gaps. Species composition exhibited the most significant changes in large circular gaps. From a conservation aspect, all gap types can be considered favorable, as they increase the heterogeneity of the openness and understory vegetation in homogeneous closed stands. Vegetation changes are the most prominent in large circular gaps w spread of bramble here multiple vegetation layers developed. However, the dense cover of bramble and shrubs hinders the effective regeneration of sessile oak (<em>Quercus petraea</em>). Smaller gaps slightly increase the heterogeneity of the forest understory and provide ample light and soil moisture to initiate regeneration. In larger gaps, oak regeneration may be supported by applying an elongated shape, mitigating the competition from bramble.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"578 ","pages":"Article 122471"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724007837","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Forest biodiversity is threatened by the use of conventional rotation forestry system, while fine-scale interventions of continuous cover forestry, such as gap-cutting, could protect forest habitats and enhance the stand structural heterogeneity. Consequently, their use could maintain biodiversity during the timber production process. It is unclear which gap sizes and shapes can trigger ample natural regeneration while simultaneously maintaining or improving the near-natural character of the understory. The Pilis Gap Experiment examined the five-year effects of four gap types comparing two gap sizes (150 and 300 m2) and two gap shapes (circular and elongated) on the light and soil moisture conditions and understory vegetation in an oak–hornbeam forest. The investigated understory variables included species richness, total cover, height, shrub cover and cover of five functional groups. Our results indicate an initially increased light in all gap types, but later it decreased in large circular gaps, while remaining more stable in other gap types. Soil moisture increased first, transiently in the circular gaps, and later in the elongated gaps. Species richness temporarily increased in large circular gaps, whereas total cover increased in all gap types. Understory height and shrub cover also increased in large circular gaps. Annual and perennial forb cover remained unchanged in all gap types, although graminoid cover showed transient growth in large elongated gaps. Small gaps had the highest cover of woody seedlings, whereas bramble (Rubus fruticosus agg.) cover increased the most in large circular gaps. Species composition exhibited the most significant changes in large circular gaps. From a conservation aspect, all gap types can be considered favorable, as they increase the heterogeneity of the openness and understory vegetation in homogeneous closed stands. Vegetation changes are the most prominent in large circular gaps w spread of bramble here multiple vegetation layers developed. However, the dense cover of bramble and shrubs hinders the effective regeneration of sessile oak (Quercus petraea). Smaller gaps slightly increase the heterogeneity of the forest understory and provide ample light and soil moisture to initiate regeneration. In larger gaps, oak regeneration may be supported by applying an elongated shape, mitigating the competition from bramble.
期刊介绍:
Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world.
A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers.
We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include:
1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests;
2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management;
3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023);
4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript.
The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.