The interplay of different sensory attributes in lingonberry nectars with sucrose and high intensity sweeteners

Kjersti Aaby, Josefine Skaret, Ingunn Berget, Paula Varela
{"title":"The interplay of different sensory attributes in lingonberry nectars with sucrose and high intensity sweeteners","authors":"Kjersti Aaby,&nbsp;Josefine Skaret,&nbsp;Ingunn Berget,&nbsp;Paula Varela","doi":"10.1016/j.afres.2024.100681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lingonberries are associated with several health benefits and have a distinct flavour, but the berries are also bitter, astringent and sour. Addition of a sweetener, traditionally sucrose, is necessary to increase palatability of lingonberry products. Meanwhile, there is a goal to reduce sugar consumption. Alternative sweeteners may, however, have different sensory profiles compared to sucrose. The aim of the study was to understand the changes in the sensory profiles of lingonberry juice sweetened with high intensity sweeteners (sucralose, aspartame or acesulfame K) alone or in combination (1/1), compared to sucrose (10 %). The sensory profiles of the lingonberry nectars were evaluated by quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA) and temporal-check-all-that-apply (TCATA). According to both QDA and TCATA results, the nectars sweetened with aspartame and the blend of aspartame and acesulfame K were most like the nectar with sucrose. These beverages were characterised by more sweet taste, fullness and sour flavour and less pungent sensation, acidic taste, and astringency than the other nectars. The nectars that differed most from the reference were those sweetened with sucralose, acesulfame K and the blend of aspartame and sucralose. The nectar with the blend of acesulfame K and sucralose had a similar temporal profile to the sucrose sweetened juice but was evaluated differently in the QDA. QDA and TCATA provided complementary insights, with QDA identifying static attributes and TCATA capturing dynamic changes in sensory perception over time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8168,"journal":{"name":"Applied Food Research","volume":"5 1","pages":"Article 100681"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Food Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772502224002919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lingonberries are associated with several health benefits and have a distinct flavour, but the berries are also bitter, astringent and sour. Addition of a sweetener, traditionally sucrose, is necessary to increase palatability of lingonberry products. Meanwhile, there is a goal to reduce sugar consumption. Alternative sweeteners may, however, have different sensory profiles compared to sucrose. The aim of the study was to understand the changes in the sensory profiles of lingonberry juice sweetened with high intensity sweeteners (sucralose, aspartame or acesulfame K) alone or in combination (1/1), compared to sucrose (10 %). The sensory profiles of the lingonberry nectars were evaluated by quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA) and temporal-check-all-that-apply (TCATA). According to both QDA and TCATA results, the nectars sweetened with aspartame and the blend of aspartame and acesulfame K were most like the nectar with sucrose. These beverages were characterised by more sweet taste, fullness and sour flavour and less pungent sensation, acidic taste, and astringency than the other nectars. The nectars that differed most from the reference were those sweetened with sucralose, acesulfame K and the blend of aspartame and sucralose. The nectar with the blend of acesulfame K and sucralose had a similar temporal profile to the sucrose sweetened juice but was evaluated differently in the QDA. QDA and TCATA provided complementary insights, with QDA identifying static attributes and TCATA capturing dynamic changes in sensory perception over time.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative effect of boiling, microwave and ultrasonication treatment on microstructure, nutritional and microbial quality of Tofu Orange sweet potato flour production: Comparative effects on ultrasound, drying, storage, and techno-economic assessment Liposome-like encapsulation of fish oil-based self-nano emulsifying formulation for improved bioavailability Enhancing grape juice with Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus CWKu-12: Assessing probiotic viability, physicochemical changes, sensory characteristics, and quality kinetics throughout storage Combined effects of alginate based active edible coatings and irradiation treatment on the quality characteristics of Beef Meat at 2°C
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1