From policy implementation to public perception: A dual approach to assessing disaster recovery success in the Wenchuan and Bam earthquake recovery projects

IF 4.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International journal of disaster risk reduction Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.105162
Homa Bahmani , Yibin Ao , Wei Zhang , Qiang Xu , Hao Zhu , Dan Ren , Huan Yu
{"title":"From policy implementation to public perception: A dual approach to assessing disaster recovery success in the Wenchuan and Bam earthquake recovery projects","authors":"Homa Bahmani ,&nbsp;Yibin Ao ,&nbsp;Wei Zhang ,&nbsp;Qiang Xu ,&nbsp;Hao Zhu ,&nbsp;Dan Ren ,&nbsp;Huan Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.105162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The present approaches for disaster recovery assessment most often solely concentrate on the tangible outcomes officially documented by local authorities. Therefore, they face shortcomings in addressing impacted populations' complex experiences and perspectives. Top-down disaster recovery evaluation methods emphasize macro-level variables, including infrastructure restoration and economic revitalization. Conversely, bottom-up evaluation methodologies emphasize community-level perceptions, including recovery assessment, residents' emotional well-being, and satisfaction. By integrating top-down and bottom-up disaster recovery assessment methods, this study seeks to close this knowledge gap and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the disaster recovery assessment approaches that followed the 2008 Wenchuan and 2003 Bam earthquakes in China and Iran. This study found that while Wenchuan's recovery benefited from a more structured and comprehensive approach, insufficient public involvement presented significant challenges. In contrast, Bam's reliance on community participation underscored the significance of meticulous planning and accountability in attaining long-term recovery success. Temporal recovery trends over reconstruction years in Wenchuan revealed that recovery trends varied throughout the region. The local government's main priority was rehabilitating the built environment and infrastructure. However, the public regarded social and economic recovery as more important factors for a successful recovery after a disaster. Thus, it is imperative to prioritize comprehensive planning to balance long-term social and economic development strategies and immediate infrastructure needs. Integrating top-down and bottom-up approaches allows policy-makers and local stakeholders to understand better the relationships between macro-level recovery trends and micro-level recovery perceptions. This way, disaster recovery projects may expect fostered recovery plans that sustainably meet both parties' needs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 105162"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420924009245","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present approaches for disaster recovery assessment most often solely concentrate on the tangible outcomes officially documented by local authorities. Therefore, they face shortcomings in addressing impacted populations' complex experiences and perspectives. Top-down disaster recovery evaluation methods emphasize macro-level variables, including infrastructure restoration and economic revitalization. Conversely, bottom-up evaluation methodologies emphasize community-level perceptions, including recovery assessment, residents' emotional well-being, and satisfaction. By integrating top-down and bottom-up disaster recovery assessment methods, this study seeks to close this knowledge gap and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the disaster recovery assessment approaches that followed the 2008 Wenchuan and 2003 Bam earthquakes in China and Iran. This study found that while Wenchuan's recovery benefited from a more structured and comprehensive approach, insufficient public involvement presented significant challenges. In contrast, Bam's reliance on community participation underscored the significance of meticulous planning and accountability in attaining long-term recovery success. Temporal recovery trends over reconstruction years in Wenchuan revealed that recovery trends varied throughout the region. The local government's main priority was rehabilitating the built environment and infrastructure. However, the public regarded social and economic recovery as more important factors for a successful recovery after a disaster. Thus, it is imperative to prioritize comprehensive planning to balance long-term social and economic development strategies and immediate infrastructure needs. Integrating top-down and bottom-up approaches allows policy-makers and local stakeholders to understand better the relationships between macro-level recovery trends and micro-level recovery perceptions. This way, disaster recovery projects may expect fostered recovery plans that sustainably meet both parties' needs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从政策实施到公众认知:评估汶川和巴姆地震灾后恢复项目成功与否的双重方法
目前的灾后恢复评估方法往往只注重地方当局正式记录的实际成果。因此,它们在处理受影响人口的复杂经历和观点方面存在不足。自上而下的灾后恢复评估方法强调宏观层面的变量,包括基础设施恢复和经济振兴。相反,自下而上的评估方法强调社区层面的认知,包括恢复评估、居民的情绪健康和满意度。通过整合自顶向下和自底向上的灾害恢复评估方法,本研究试图弥补这一知识缺口,并对2008年汶川地震和2003年中国和伊朗巴姆地震后的灾害恢复评估方法提供更全面的理解。本研究发现,虽然汶川灾后重建得益于更有组织、更全面的方法,但公众参与不足仍是重大挑战。相比之下,Bam对社区参与的依赖强调了细致规划和问责制对实现长期恢复成功的重要性。汶川重建年份的时间恢复趋势表明,该地区的恢复趋势各不相同。当地政府的首要任务是修复建筑环境和基础设施。然而,公众认为社会和经济恢复是灾后成功恢复的更重要因素。因此,必须优先进行全面规划,以平衡长期的社会和经济发展战略与当前的基础设施需求。整合自顶向下和自底向上的方法可以让决策者和地方利益相关者更好地理解宏观层面的恢复趋势和微观层面的恢复观念之间的关系。通过这种方式,灾难恢复项目可以期望培育出可持续地满足双方需求的恢复计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
期刊最新文献
From prediction to decision: An explainable AI framework for Urban ground subsidence risk management When wildfires reward incumbents: Risk exposure and electoral accountability in Chile Seismic damage characteristics and vulnerability analysis of Tibetan earth-timber structure buildings in the Ms 6.8 earthquake in Tingri, Tibet, China Assessing the potential of implementing room for the river in Taiwan to enhance flood resilience A survival guide for assessing global fire risks to natural and human systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1