The influence of small mass loss rate peaks on the rate of spread of predictive flame spread simulations: A theoretical study

IF 3.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Fire Safety Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.firesaf.2025.104344
Tássia L.S. Quaresma , Tristan Hehnen , Lukas Arnold
{"title":"The influence of small mass loss rate peaks on the rate of spread of predictive flame spread simulations: A theoretical study","authors":"Tássia L.S. Quaresma ,&nbsp;Tristan Hehnen ,&nbsp;Lukas Arnold","doi":"10.1016/j.firesaf.2025.104344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Peaks in the mass loss rate (MLR) curve derived from thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) are commonly used to infer the pyrolysis rates of solid fuels. While the main peaks are often modelled, smaller MLR fluctuations are typically neglected, leading to discrepancies between models and experiments. The impact of these small fluctuations on key simulation predictions, however, remains unclear. This study systematically explores a specific scenario in which a small MLR fluctuation significantly affects the predicted rate of spread (ROS) of a simplified flame spread simulation. The MaCFP-recommended pyrolysis model for poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) is adapted to incorporate a small MLR peak accounting for 0.5<!--> <!-->% to 2<!--> <!-->% of the sample’s total mass. Results from sensitivity analyses show that the peak position has the greatest impact on the ROS, followed by the peak mass fraction, while the peak width has negligible effect. Adding a small peak at lower temperatures increased the ROS by up to 6<!--> <!-->% to 13<!--> <!-->%, depending on the peak’s mass fraction, whereas peaks at higher temperatures had little to no effect. These results indicate that fluctuations at lower temperatures, w.r.t. the main peak, could significantly enhance the predicted spread rates and should be considered in flame spread simulations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50445,"journal":{"name":"Fire Safety Journal","volume":"152 ","pages":"Article 104344"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Safety Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379711225000086","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peaks in the mass loss rate (MLR) curve derived from thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) are commonly used to infer the pyrolysis rates of solid fuels. While the main peaks are often modelled, smaller MLR fluctuations are typically neglected, leading to discrepancies between models and experiments. The impact of these small fluctuations on key simulation predictions, however, remains unclear. This study systematically explores a specific scenario in which a small MLR fluctuation significantly affects the predicted rate of spread (ROS) of a simplified flame spread simulation. The MaCFP-recommended pyrolysis model for poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) is adapted to incorporate a small MLR peak accounting for 0.5 % to 2 % of the sample’s total mass. Results from sensitivity analyses show that the peak position has the greatest impact on the ROS, followed by the peak mass fraction, while the peak width has negligible effect. Adding a small peak at lower temperatures increased the ROS by up to 6 % to 13 %, depending on the peak’s mass fraction, whereas peaks at higher temperatures had little to no effect. These results indicate that fluctuations at lower temperatures, w.r.t. the main peak, could significantly enhance the predicted spread rates and should be considered in flame spread simulations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fire Safety Journal
Fire Safety Journal 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
153
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Fire Safety Journal is the leading publication dealing with all aspects of fire safety engineering. Its scope is purposefully wide, as it is deemed important to encourage papers from all sources within this multidisciplinary subject, thus providing a forum for its further development as a distinct engineering discipline. This is an essential step towards gaining a status equal to that enjoyed by the other engineering disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Dangerous damage of RC structural members caused by thermal spalling of concrete during fire in an enclosed car park of residential building The influence of small mass loss rate peaks on the rate of spread of predictive flame spread simulations: A theoretical study Systems thinking in road tunnel safety: Feasibility of evacuation shelters for single-tube road tunnels Study on the applicability of scaling laws in tunnel fires under natural ventilation conditions Large-scale compartment fires to develop a self-extinction design framework for mass timber-Part 2: Results, analysis and design implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1