You and me: The influence of personality on the trust process in (un)trustworthy, (un)familiar interactions

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2024.113007
August Capiola , Gene M. Alarcon , Krista N. Harris , Sarah A. Jessup , Izz aldin Hamdan , Jacob Noblick , Dexter Johnson
{"title":"You and me: The influence of personality on the trust process in (un)trustworthy, (un)familiar interactions","authors":"August Capiola ,&nbsp;Gene M. Alarcon ,&nbsp;Krista N. Harris ,&nbsp;Sarah A. Jessup ,&nbsp;Izz aldin Hamdan ,&nbsp;Jacob Noblick ,&nbsp;Dexter Johnson","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2024.113007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The trust process has been researched extensively. However, one under-researched aspect is the influence of individual differences on trust-relevant criteria in interactions comprising familiar versus unfamiliar partners who are (un)trustworthy. The present work manipulated both partner trustworthiness and familiarity in a mixed-design, examining the influence of propensity to trust and risk aversion in an in-person, collaborative task. Using a growth modeling approach, this work examined the influence of propensity to trust and risk aversion on the intercept and slope variance, respectively, of criteria of interest. Results demonstrated propensity to trust accounted for trustors’ intercept variance for benevolence and integrity perceptions, regardless of whether they knew the trustee. However, risk aversion did not predict criteria of interest. The results speak to the importance of assessing individual differences in psychological experiments investigating the trust process, motivating future work to further investigate the degree to which a trustor is familiar with the trustee and increased monetary risk in dyadic interactions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"236 ","pages":"Article 113007"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924004677","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The trust process has been researched extensively. However, one under-researched aspect is the influence of individual differences on trust-relevant criteria in interactions comprising familiar versus unfamiliar partners who are (un)trustworthy. The present work manipulated both partner trustworthiness and familiarity in a mixed-design, examining the influence of propensity to trust and risk aversion in an in-person, collaborative task. Using a growth modeling approach, this work examined the influence of propensity to trust and risk aversion on the intercept and slope variance, respectively, of criteria of interest. Results demonstrated propensity to trust accounted for trustors’ intercept variance for benevolence and integrity perceptions, regardless of whether they knew the trustee. However, risk aversion did not predict criteria of interest. The results speak to the importance of assessing individual differences in psychological experiments investigating the trust process, motivating future work to further investigate the degree to which a trustor is familiar with the trustee and increased monetary risk in dyadic interactions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
From self-interest to group interest: Machiavellianism fuels intergroup bias depending on ingroup identification Genetic origins of Utilitarian versus Kantian moral philosophy in heritable motivations for egalitarian beneficence and coercive redistribution Catching up or putting them down? An investigation of employee divergent reactions to coworker conscientiousness Individual differences in perceiving disinformation sharing as opinion leadership: Effects of dark triad traits, need for uniqueness, and green identity Independence of intellect and ego relates to increased subjective well-being and decreased psychopathology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1