Confidence does not equal competence: Socially dominant individuals are more confident in their decisions without being more accurate

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2024.113037
A. Belotelova , A.K. Martin
{"title":"Confidence does not equal competence: Socially dominant individuals are more confident in their decisions without being more accurate","authors":"A. Belotelova ,&nbsp;A.K. Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2024.113037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>High status within social hierarchies is often the reserve of socially dominant individuals. Faster responses have been identified as a cognitive predisposition of socially dominant individuals, thought to confer an advantage by allowing them to act first in social contexts. Response speed is also thought to reflect decision confidence, but this has not been directly investigated in relation to social dominance. Moreover, personality traits, such as extraversion, may show a similar relationship with decision-making speed and confidence and may explain any relationship with social dominance. Confidence is thought to be domain specific and it is therefore important to assess whether any association between decision confidence and social dominance, is also observed in other cognitive domains. Across three studies, we assessed performance on a two-choice statistical learning decision-making task and a self-referential memory task. To measure metacognitive bias, we included confidence for both decisions and memory traces. We also included a measure of extraversion to investigate whether these two related personality traits explain overlapping or unique variance in task performance. Across three studies, social dominance and extraversion were positively correlated. Both social dominance and extraversion independently predicted variance on confidence for decisions, with stronger evidence for a unique role for social dominance, but no relationship was identified for confidence in memory traces.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"236 ","pages":"Article 113037"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924004975","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High status within social hierarchies is often the reserve of socially dominant individuals. Faster responses have been identified as a cognitive predisposition of socially dominant individuals, thought to confer an advantage by allowing them to act first in social contexts. Response speed is also thought to reflect decision confidence, but this has not been directly investigated in relation to social dominance. Moreover, personality traits, such as extraversion, may show a similar relationship with decision-making speed and confidence and may explain any relationship with social dominance. Confidence is thought to be domain specific and it is therefore important to assess whether any association between decision confidence and social dominance, is also observed in other cognitive domains. Across three studies, we assessed performance on a two-choice statistical learning decision-making task and a self-referential memory task. To measure metacognitive bias, we included confidence for both decisions and memory traces. We also included a measure of extraversion to investigate whether these two related personality traits explain overlapping or unique variance in task performance. Across three studies, social dominance and extraversion were positively correlated. Both social dominance and extraversion independently predicted variance on confidence for decisions, with stronger evidence for a unique role for social dominance, but no relationship was identified for confidence in memory traces.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自信不等于能力:在社会上占主导地位的人对自己的决定更自信,但并不更准确
社会等级制度中的高地位往往是社会支配个人的保留。更快的反应被认为是社会优势个体的一种认知倾向,被认为是通过允许他们在社会环境中首先行动而赋予优势。反应速度也被认为反映了决策信心,但这并没有直接研究与社会支配地位的关系。此外,性格特征,如外向性,可能与决策速度和自信表现出类似的关系,并可能解释与社会支配的任何关系。自信被认为是特定领域的,因此评估决策自信和社会支配地位之间的联系是否在其他认知领域也被观察到是很重要的。在三项研究中,我们评估了两项选择统计学习决策任务和自我参照记忆任务的表现。为了测量元认知偏差,我们包括了对决策和记忆痕迹的信心。我们还纳入了外向性的测量,以调查这两种相关的人格特征是否解释了任务表现的重叠或独特差异。在三项研究中,社会支配和外向性呈正相关。社会优势和外向性都独立预测了决策信心的变化,更有力的证据表明社会优势具有独特的作用,但没有发现对记忆痕迹的信心的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
Moral foundations in the 2020s: Advancements in measurement, genetics, brain science, and real-world impact Interpersonal stressors, interpersonal sensitivity, and loneliness among college students: Disentangling between- and within-person associations Sociosexuality in men and women: Considering core self-judgments and (im)moral orientations Individual differences in adolescents' digital well-being: How perceived stress, fear of missing out, and self-control interact in daily life Is consideration of future consequences consistent across specific domains? A latent profile analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1