Mallory Jebbia MD, Jeffry Nahmias MD MHPE, Sebastian Schubl MD, Matthew Dolich MD, Michael Lekawa MD, Allen Kong MD, Areg Grigorian MD
{"title":"Propensity matched analysis of DPA or DPL used within the first hour for severely hypotensive blunt trauma patients","authors":"Mallory Jebbia MD, Jeffry Nahmias MD MHPE, Sebastian Schubl MD, Matthew Dolich MD, Michael Lekawa MD, Allen Kong MD, Areg Grigorian MD","doi":"10.1016/j.sopen.2025.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Prior single-center reports advocate for use of diagnostic peritoneal aspiration or lavage (DPA/DPL) to identify blunt trauma patients (BTPs) with intra-abdominal hemorrhage who require emergent surgery. Despite this, concerns exist over the potential for DPA/DPL to delay transfer to the operating room (OR). We hypothesized that DPA/DPL application in severely hypotensive BTPs would lead to increased OR transfer time and in-hospital mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The 2017–2019 TQIP database was queried for adult BTPs presenting with severe hypotension (systolic blood pressure <70 mmHg) who underwent any operative intervention within two-hours. Using a 1:2 propensity-score model, patients who underwent DPA/DPL within one-hour of arrival were compared with those who did not, controlling for age, sex, comorbidities, ≥6 units of packed red cells within 4 h, and injury profile.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 5514 patients, 62 (1.1 %) underwent DPA/DPL. We matched 52 DPA/DPL patients to 104 patients not undergoing DPA/DPL. There were no differences in the matched variables between cohorts (all p > 0.05). Compared to those not undergoing DPA/DPL, patients undergoing DPA/DPL had a higher rate/risk of in-hospital complications (59.6 % vs. 39.4 %, p = 0.02) (OR 2.27, CI 1.15–4.47, p = 0.02) but statistically similar rate/risk of death (65.4 % vs. 50.0 %, p = 0.07) (OR 1.89, CI 0.95–3.76, p = 0.07). Time to OR was similar between both groups (DPA/DPL 39 min vs. non-DPA/DPL 42 min, p = 0.87).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>DPA or DPL used within the first hour of arrival does not appear to delay time to OR and does not increase risk of death. This challenges concerns over potential DPA/DPL-associated delays and heightened mortality risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74892,"journal":{"name":"Surgery open science","volume":"24 ","pages":"Pages 1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845025000065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Prior single-center reports advocate for use of diagnostic peritoneal aspiration or lavage (DPA/DPL) to identify blunt trauma patients (BTPs) with intra-abdominal hemorrhage who require emergent surgery. Despite this, concerns exist over the potential for DPA/DPL to delay transfer to the operating room (OR). We hypothesized that DPA/DPL application in severely hypotensive BTPs would lead to increased OR transfer time and in-hospital mortality.
Methods
The 2017–2019 TQIP database was queried for adult BTPs presenting with severe hypotension (systolic blood pressure <70 mmHg) who underwent any operative intervention within two-hours. Using a 1:2 propensity-score model, patients who underwent DPA/DPL within one-hour of arrival were compared with those who did not, controlling for age, sex, comorbidities, ≥6 units of packed red cells within 4 h, and injury profile.
Results
From 5514 patients, 62 (1.1 %) underwent DPA/DPL. We matched 52 DPA/DPL patients to 104 patients not undergoing DPA/DPL. There were no differences in the matched variables between cohorts (all p > 0.05). Compared to those not undergoing DPA/DPL, patients undergoing DPA/DPL had a higher rate/risk of in-hospital complications (59.6 % vs. 39.4 %, p = 0.02) (OR 2.27, CI 1.15–4.47, p = 0.02) but statistically similar rate/risk of death (65.4 % vs. 50.0 %, p = 0.07) (OR 1.89, CI 0.95–3.76, p = 0.07). Time to OR was similar between both groups (DPA/DPL 39 min vs. non-DPA/DPL 42 min, p = 0.87).
Conclusion
DPA or DPL used within the first hour of arrival does not appear to delay time to OR and does not increase risk of death. This challenges concerns over potential DPA/DPL-associated delays and heightened mortality risks.
背景:先前的单中心报告主张使用诊断性腹膜抽吸或灌洗(DPA/DPL)来识别钝性创伤患者(btp)并发腹内出血,需要紧急手术。尽管如此,人们仍然担心DPA/DPL可能会延迟转移到手术室(OR)。我们假设DPA/DPL应用于严重低血压的BTPs会增加手术室转院时间和住院死亡率。方法查询2017-2019年TQIP数据库中出现严重低血压(收缩压70 mmHg)且在2小时内接受任何手术干预的成人btp患者。采用1:2倾向评分模型,比较在到达后1小时内接受DPA/DPL的患者与未接受DPA/DPL的患者,控制年龄、性别、合并症、4小时内堆积红细胞≥6单位和损伤情况。结果5514例患者中,62例(1.1%)行DPA/DPL。我们将52例DPA/DPL患者与104例未接受DPA/DPL的患者进行了配对。各组间匹配变量无差异(均p >;0.05)。与未接受DPA/DPL的患者相比,接受DPA/DPL的患者住院并发症发生率/风险更高(59.6%比39.4%,p = 0.02) (OR 2.27, CI 1.15-4.47, p = 0.02),但死亡率/风险在统计学上相似(OR 1.89, CI 0.95-3.76, p = 0.07)。两组到OR的时间相似(DPA/DPL 39 min vs.非DPA/DPL 42 min, p = 0.87)。结论在患者到达后1小时内使用dpa或DPL不会延迟到or时间,也不会增加死亡风险。这挑战了人们对潜在的DPA/ dpl相关延迟和更高死亡率风险的担忧。