China's provincial net-zero emissions effort: High-quality choices behind up-bottom quota schemes

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Resources Conservation and Recycling Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.108118
Haoran Wang , Tiantian Feng , Jiajie Kong , Mingli Cui , Daoshun Zha
{"title":"China's provincial net-zero emissions effort: High-quality choices behind up-bottom quota schemes","authors":"Haoran Wang ,&nbsp;Tiantian Feng ,&nbsp;Jiajie Kong ,&nbsp;Mingli Cui ,&nbsp;Daoshun Zha","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.108118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Carbon emission rights are the spotlight for countries around the world in terms of how to allocate these under net-zero targets. This study proposes five allocation principles based on the carbon emission rights allocation mechanism, including equality, responsibility, capacity, efficiency, and time phases. Seventeen interprovincial emission allocation schemes are studied under China's net-zero emissions path, and then the best allocation scheme is selected using the PROMETHEE II and the linkage relationship among provincial quotas is clarifies using the PROMETHEE I. The results show that (1) the quota schemes that considers of equality, responsibility, capacity, efficiency and phasing principles to fully interprets “Common but Differentiated Responsibilities”. (2) Southeastern coastal areas such as Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Shanghai are assigned more quotas, whereas northeastern and western regions such as Heilongjiang and Jilin are allocated fewer quotas in the optimal scheme. (3) The government needs to dynamically adjust quota allocation principles on the basis of national emission reduction strategy goals and low-carbon policies. These results can provide China's provincial carbon emission share in reaching net zero to help formulate a provincial carbon action blueprint.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 108118"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924007080","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carbon emission rights are the spotlight for countries around the world in terms of how to allocate these under net-zero targets. This study proposes five allocation principles based on the carbon emission rights allocation mechanism, including equality, responsibility, capacity, efficiency, and time phases. Seventeen interprovincial emission allocation schemes are studied under China's net-zero emissions path, and then the best allocation scheme is selected using the PROMETHEE II and the linkage relationship among provincial quotas is clarifies using the PROMETHEE I. The results show that (1) the quota schemes that considers of equality, responsibility, capacity, efficiency and phasing principles to fully interprets “Common but Differentiated Responsibilities”. (2) Southeastern coastal areas such as Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Shanghai are assigned more quotas, whereas northeastern and western regions such as Heilongjiang and Jilin are allocated fewer quotas in the optimal scheme. (3) The government needs to dynamically adjust quota allocation principles on the basis of national emission reduction strategy goals and low-carbon policies. These results can provide China's provincial carbon emission share in reaching net zero to help formulate a provincial carbon action blueprint.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国省级净零排放努力:自下而上的配额制度背后的高质量选择
如何在净零目标下分配碳排放权是世界各国关注的焦点。本研究提出了基于碳排放权分配机制的五项分配原则,包括平等原则、责任原则、能力原则、效率原则和时间阶段原则。研究了中国净零排放路径下的17个省际排放分配方案,利用PROMETHEE II选择了最佳分配方案,并利用PROMETHEE i澄清了各省配额之间的联动关系。结果表明:(1)考虑平等、责任、能力、效率和分阶段原则的配额方案充分诠释了“共同但有区别的责任”。②广东、浙江、上海等东南沿海地区在最优方案中分配的配额较多,黑龙江、吉林等东北和西部地区分配的配额较少。(3)政府需要根据国家减排战略目标和低碳政策动态调整配额分配原则。这些结果可以为中国各省实现净零排放的碳排放份额提供参考,帮助制定省级碳行动蓝图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
期刊最新文献
The impacts of input data on visual-language models (VLM) in automated solid waste recognition Unveiling potential water and land resource pressures under the electrolytic hydrogen boom in China Sustainable food waste valorization pathways through co-treatment with wastewater: A bench-scale study One-step conversion into Al2O3 coated Si nanowire anode from photovoltaic silicon waste wafers through electrothermal shock for excellent capacity retention Fostering industrial collaboration for polyester recycling in a circular economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1