The chemical composition of the stem bark of Picea jezoensis var. komarovii and its significance in chemotaxonomy

IF 1.4 4区生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Biochemical Systematics and Ecology Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1016/j.bse.2024.104944

Mengwei Gao , Yue Zhang , Yan Piao, Lele Xu, Qiong Wu, Xiongjie Yin, Sihong Wang, Xinchun Yu, Changhao Zhang, Lili Jin

{"title":"The chemical composition of the stem bark of Picea jezoensis var. komarovii and its significance in chemotaxonomy","authors":"Mengwei Gao , Yue Zhang , Yan Piao, Lele Xu, Qiong Wu, Xiongjie Yin, Sihong Wang, Xinchun Yu, Changhao Zhang, Lili Jin","doi":"10.1016/j.bse.2024.104944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, 24 compounds were isolated from the stem bark of Picea jezoensis var. komarovii (V.N. Vassil.) W.C.Cheng & L.K.Fu, comprising seven flavonoids (1–7), four phenolics (8, 10, 11, 17), one stilbene (9), two phenolic glycosides (12, 19), one coumarin (13), one organic acid (14), two lipids (15, 21), one aromatic glycoside (16), two acetophenone glycosides (18, 20), and three glycosides (22–24). The chemical structures of these metabolites were elucidated by NMR spectroscopy and compared with previously reported data in the literature. Compounds 1, 13–16, 23, and 24 were first isolated from a plant of the genus Picea, and 19, 20, and 22 were first isolated from a plant belonging to the Pinaceae family. The chemotaxonomic significance of these compounds is discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8799,"journal":{"name":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 104944"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305197824001625","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, 24 compounds were isolated from the stem bark of Picea jezoensis var. komarovii (V.N. Vassil.) W.C.Cheng & L.K.Fu, comprising seven flavonoids (1–7), four phenolics (8, 10, 11, 17), one stilbene (9), two phenolic glycosides (12, 19), one coumarin (13), one organic acid (14), two lipids (15, 21), one aromatic glycoside (16), two acetophenone glycosides (18, 20), and three glycosides (22–24). The chemical structures of these metabolites were elucidated by NMR spectroscopy and compared with previously reported data in the literature. Compounds 1, 13–16, 23, and 24 were first isolated from a plant of the genus Picea, and 19, 20, and 22 were first isolated from a plant belonging to the Pinaceae family. The chemotaxonomic significance of these compounds is discussed.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 生物-进化生物学

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

12.50%

发文量

147

审稿时长

43 days

期刊介绍： Biochemical Systematics and Ecology is devoted to the publication of original papers and reviews, both submitted and invited, in two subject areas: I) the application of biochemistry to problems relating to systematic biology of organisms (biochemical systematics); II) the role of biochemistry in interactions between organisms or between an organism and its environment (biochemical ecology). In the Biochemical Systematics subject area, comparative studies of the distribution of (secondary) metabolites within a wider taxon (e.g. genus or family) are welcome. Comparative studies, encompassing multiple accessions of each of the taxa within their distribution are particularly encouraged. Welcome are also studies combining classical chemosystematic studies (such as comparative HPLC-MS or GC-MS investigations) with (macro-) molecular phylogenetic studies. Studies that involve the comparative use of compounds to help differentiate among species such as adulterants or substitutes that illustrate the applied use of chemosystematics are welcome. In contrast, studies solely employing macromolecular phylogenetic techniques (gene sequences, RAPD studies etc.) will be considered out of scope. Discouraged are manuscripts that report known or new compounds from a single source taxon without addressing a systematic hypothesis. Also considered out of scope are studies using outdated and hard to reproduce macromolecular techniques such as RAPDs in combination with standard chemosystematic techniques such as GC-FID and GC-MS.