{"title":"Adaptation in attentional cautiousness among highly sensitive persons: Evidence from spatial cueing paradigm","authors":"Luchuan Xiao (肖鲁川), Kris Baetens, Natacha Deroost","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Individuals with higher sensory processing sensitivity (SPS) exhibit heightened cautiousness during attentional orienting. This study investigated how expectancy influences SPS-related cautiousness in two experiments using a spatial cueing paradigm. Spatial cues either validly or invalidly signaled the location of subsequent target stimuli. Experiment 1 manipulated cue-target predictivity at 80 % and 50 % probabilities. The results indicated that higher SPS was associated with a decreased validity effect in both probability conditions, suggesting that individuals with higher SPS tend to treat valid and invalid cues similarly. Experiment 2 expanded this manipulation to include probabilities of 100 %, 80 %, and 50 %. The results confirmed that higher SPS was associated with a decreased validity effect. Additionally, individuals with higher SPS responded more slowly; however, this slowing diminished as valid probability approached full predictivity (100 %), compared to partial probabilities (50 % and 80 %). The decreased validity effect associated with higher SPS supports the notion of heightened cautiousness in attentional orienting among highly sensitive individuals. Moreover, our findings suggest that highly sensitive individuals prefer predictable events, but can adapt their cautious attentional approach in response to varying expectancy levels. This study empirically links SPS to a preference for greater certainty while simultaneously showing adaptability under uncertain conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"237 ","pages":"Article 113042"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925000042","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Individuals with higher sensory processing sensitivity (SPS) exhibit heightened cautiousness during attentional orienting. This study investigated how expectancy influences SPS-related cautiousness in two experiments using a spatial cueing paradigm. Spatial cues either validly or invalidly signaled the location of subsequent target stimuli. Experiment 1 manipulated cue-target predictivity at 80 % and 50 % probabilities. The results indicated that higher SPS was associated with a decreased validity effect in both probability conditions, suggesting that individuals with higher SPS tend to treat valid and invalid cues similarly. Experiment 2 expanded this manipulation to include probabilities of 100 %, 80 %, and 50 %. The results confirmed that higher SPS was associated with a decreased validity effect. Additionally, individuals with higher SPS responded more slowly; however, this slowing diminished as valid probability approached full predictivity (100 %), compared to partial probabilities (50 % and 80 %). The decreased validity effect associated with higher SPS supports the notion of heightened cautiousness in attentional orienting among highly sensitive individuals. Moreover, our findings suggest that highly sensitive individuals prefer predictable events, but can adapt their cautious attentional approach in response to varying expectancy levels. This study empirically links SPS to a preference for greater certainty while simultaneously showing adaptability under uncertain conditions.
期刊介绍:
Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.