Self-identified causes of longing for touch in adults: An exploratory study

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2025.113053
B. Hasenack , T. Brand , A. Keizer
{"title":"Self-identified causes of longing for touch in adults: An exploratory study","authors":"B. Hasenack ,&nbsp;T. Brand ,&nbsp;A. Keizer","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous studies have shown that the prevalence of longing for touch (LFT) is high, but little is known about the potential causes. In order to provide insights into this, the current study mapped the self-identified causes of LFT in a community sample. A total of 186 adults participated in the study. The prevalence of LFT was 76.3 %. Participants with LFT were asked to identify the causes by responding to thirteen closed items and one open question. The thirteen closed items were constructed based on literature and conversations with professionals. An exploratory factor analysis conducted on these thirteen items resulted in two factors: physical distance and internal barriers. In general, physical distance was a significantly more prominent self-identified cause than internal barriers. Interestingly, men were more likely to indicate that internal barriers were a cause of their LFT than women. These results provide the first insights into the potential causes of LFT. Future studies should focus on replicating these findings in larger and more diverse samples, as well as investigating which causes are most suitable targets for interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"237 ","pages":"Article 113053"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925000157","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that the prevalence of longing for touch (LFT) is high, but little is known about the potential causes. In order to provide insights into this, the current study mapped the self-identified causes of LFT in a community sample. A total of 186 adults participated in the study. The prevalence of LFT was 76.3 %. Participants with LFT were asked to identify the causes by responding to thirteen closed items and one open question. The thirteen closed items were constructed based on literature and conversations with professionals. An exploratory factor analysis conducted on these thirteen items resulted in two factors: physical distance and internal barriers. In general, physical distance was a significantly more prominent self-identified cause than internal barriers. Interestingly, men were more likely to indicate that internal barriers were a cause of their LFT than women. These results provide the first insights into the potential causes of LFT. Future studies should focus on replicating these findings in larger and more diverse samples, as well as investigating which causes are most suitable targets for interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人渴望触摸的自我识别原因:一项探索性研究
以前的研究表明,渴望触摸(LFT)的患病率很高,但对潜在的原因知之甚少。为了深入了解这一点,目前的研究在社区样本中绘制了LFT的自我识别原因图。共有186名成年人参与了这项研究。LFT患病率为76.3%。LFT的参与者被要求通过回答13个封闭项目和一个开放问题来确定原因。13个封闭项目是根据文献和与专业人士的对话构建的。对这13个项目进行探索性因素分析,得出物理距离和内部障碍两个因素。一般来说,物理距离是比内部障碍更突出的自我认同原因。有趣的是,男性比女性更有可能表示内部障碍是导致他们LFT的原因。这些结果为LFT的潜在原因提供了第一个见解。未来的研究应侧重于在更大和更多样化的样本中复制这些发现,以及调查哪些原因是最适合的干预目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
Charisma is not just for the bold: Connecting tripartite narcissism and self-reports of charisma aspects Social support and prosocial decisions in times of distress: Helping a single recipient versus multiple recipients Development and validation of the individual and social music listening scale (ISMUS-LI) Proportionality as a predictor of utilitarian sacrifices: Evidence from the Polish MFQ-2 Sensing a rift in reality: Validation of the self-world existential isolation scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1