Validating a short measure of personal intelligence: A multimethod assessment approach

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2025.113052
Samantha M. van Rens , Colin T. Henning , A. Geoffrey Crane , Alexander MacIntosh , Gill Sitarenios , James D.A. Parker
{"title":"Validating a short measure of personal intelligence: A multimethod assessment approach","authors":"Samantha M. van Rens ,&nbsp;Colin T. Henning ,&nbsp;A. Geoffrey Crane ,&nbsp;Alexander MacIntosh ,&nbsp;Gill Sitarenios ,&nbsp;James D.A. Parker","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examined the validity of a brief measure of Personal Intelligence (PI): the Multidimensional Inventory of Personal Intelligence (MIPI-Short). PI is a broad personality trait consisting of separate dimensions of emotional intelligence (EI), social intelligence (SI), and motivational intelligence (MI). Using data from three independent samples, we assessed the construct validity of the MIPI-Short with measures of conceptually similar constructs (e.g., emotional intelligence, alexithymia) using a multimethod assessment approach (i.e., self-report, observer, and performance measures). The first sample, consisting of 257 undergraduates, examined relationships between the MIPI-Short and a widely used measure of trait EI. The second sample, consisting of 241 adults, examined relationships between the MIPI-Short and a performance-based measure of emotional and social competencies. The last sample assessed the relationship between the MIPI-Short and an observer-report measure of alexithymia in a sample of 74 couples. The MIPI-Short was found to account for 43 % of the variability in the trait EI measure. High scorers on the performance-based measure were found to have significantly higher scores on all MIPI-Short scales, and the pattern of relationships between PI and alexithymia matched prior work using only self-report measures for both constructs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"237 ","pages":"Article 113052"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925000145","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the validity of a brief measure of Personal Intelligence (PI): the Multidimensional Inventory of Personal Intelligence (MIPI-Short). PI is a broad personality trait consisting of separate dimensions of emotional intelligence (EI), social intelligence (SI), and motivational intelligence (MI). Using data from three independent samples, we assessed the construct validity of the MIPI-Short with measures of conceptually similar constructs (e.g., emotional intelligence, alexithymia) using a multimethod assessment approach (i.e., self-report, observer, and performance measures). The first sample, consisting of 257 undergraduates, examined relationships between the MIPI-Short and a widely used measure of trait EI. The second sample, consisting of 241 adults, examined relationships between the MIPI-Short and a performance-based measure of emotional and social competencies. The last sample assessed the relationship between the MIPI-Short and an observer-report measure of alexithymia in a sample of 74 couples. The MIPI-Short was found to account for 43 % of the variability in the trait EI measure. High scorers on the performance-based measure were found to have significantly higher scores on all MIPI-Short scales, and the pattern of relationships between PI and alexithymia matched prior work using only self-report measures for both constructs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证个人智力的短期测量:多方法评估方法
本研究检验了个人智力(PI)的一种简单测量方法的有效性:多维个人智力量表(简称mipi)。PI是一种广泛的人格特征,由情绪智力(EI)、社会智力(SI)和动机智力(MI)三个独立的维度组成。使用来自三个独立样本的数据,我们使用多方法评估方法(即自我报告、观察者和绩效测量),通过概念上相似的构念(如情绪智力、述情障碍)来评估MIPI-Short的构念效度。第一个样本由257名大学生组成,研究了MIPI-Short和一种广泛使用的特质EI测量之间的关系。第二个样本由241名成年人组成,研究了MIPI-Short与基于表现的情感和社交能力测量之间的关系。最后一个样本评估了74对夫妇的MIPI-Short和观察者报告的述情障碍测量之间的关系。MIPI-Short被发现占了性状EI测量变异性的43%。在基于表现的测量中得分高的人在所有MIPI-Short量表上的得分都明显更高,并且PI和述情障碍之间的关系模式与之前仅使用两种结构的自我报告测量相匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
Moral foundations in the 2020s: Advancements in measurement, genetics, brain science, and real-world impact Interpersonal stressors, interpersonal sensitivity, and loneliness among college students: Disentangling between- and within-person associations Sociosexuality in men and women: Considering core self-judgments and (im)moral orientations Individual differences in adolescents' digital well-being: How perceived stress, fear of missing out, and self-control interact in daily life Is consideration of future consequences consistent across specific domains? A latent profile analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1