Samantha M. van Rens , Colin T. Henning , A. Geoffrey Crane , Alexander MacIntosh , Gill Sitarenios , James D.A. Parker
{"title":"Validating a short measure of personal intelligence: A multimethod assessment approach","authors":"Samantha M. van Rens , Colin T. Henning , A. Geoffrey Crane , Alexander MacIntosh , Gill Sitarenios , James D.A. Parker","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examined the validity of a brief measure of Personal Intelligence (PI): the Multidimensional Inventory of Personal Intelligence (MIPI-Short). PI is a broad personality trait consisting of separate dimensions of emotional intelligence (EI), social intelligence (SI), and motivational intelligence (MI). Using data from three independent samples, we assessed the construct validity of the MIPI-Short with measures of conceptually similar constructs (e.g., emotional intelligence, alexithymia) using a multimethod assessment approach (i.e., self-report, observer, and performance measures). The first sample, consisting of 257 undergraduates, examined relationships between the MIPI-Short and a widely used measure of trait EI. The second sample, consisting of 241 adults, examined relationships between the MIPI-Short and a performance-based measure of emotional and social competencies. The last sample assessed the relationship between the MIPI-Short and an observer-report measure of alexithymia in a sample of 74 couples. The MIPI-Short was found to account for 43 % of the variability in the trait EI measure. High scorers on the performance-based measure were found to have significantly higher scores on all MIPI-Short scales, and the pattern of relationships between PI and alexithymia matched prior work using only self-report measures for both constructs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"237 ","pages":"Article 113052"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925000145","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examined the validity of a brief measure of Personal Intelligence (PI): the Multidimensional Inventory of Personal Intelligence (MIPI-Short). PI is a broad personality trait consisting of separate dimensions of emotional intelligence (EI), social intelligence (SI), and motivational intelligence (MI). Using data from three independent samples, we assessed the construct validity of the MIPI-Short with measures of conceptually similar constructs (e.g., emotional intelligence, alexithymia) using a multimethod assessment approach (i.e., self-report, observer, and performance measures). The first sample, consisting of 257 undergraduates, examined relationships between the MIPI-Short and a widely used measure of trait EI. The second sample, consisting of 241 adults, examined relationships between the MIPI-Short and a performance-based measure of emotional and social competencies. The last sample assessed the relationship between the MIPI-Short and an observer-report measure of alexithymia in a sample of 74 couples. The MIPI-Short was found to account for 43 % of the variability in the trait EI measure. High scorers on the performance-based measure were found to have significantly higher scores on all MIPI-Short scales, and the pattern of relationships between PI and alexithymia matched prior work using only self-report measures for both constructs.
期刊介绍:
Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.