Prescribed fire, managed burning, and previous wildfires reduce the severity of a southwestern US gigafire

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Forest Ecology and Management Pub Date : 2025-03-15 Epub Date: 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122540
Gavin M. Jones , Alexander Spannuth , Angela Chongpinitchai , Matthew D. Hurteau
{"title":"Prescribed fire, managed burning, and previous wildfires reduce the severity of a southwestern US gigafire","authors":"Gavin M. Jones ,&nbsp;Alexander Spannuth ,&nbsp;Angela Chongpinitchai ,&nbsp;Matthew D. Hurteau","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In many parts of the western United States, wildfires are becoming larger and more severe, threatening the persistence of forest ecosystems. Understanding the ways in which management activities such as prescribed fire and managed wildfire can mitigate fire severity is essential for developing effective forest conservation strategies. We evaluated the effects of previous fuels reduction treatments, including prescribed fire and wildfire managed for resource benefit, and other wildfires on the burn severity of the 2022 Black Fire in southwestern New Mexico, USA. The Black Fire burned over 131,000 ha in mostly low- to middle-elevation ponderosa pine and mixed conifer forests, but burned only ∼4 % at high-severity, leading us to question what factors led to this fire burning in such an ecologically beneficial way and aligning with the natural range of variation in terms of burn severity for this region. In a landscape scale analysis, we found that areas that experienced more prescribed fire, wildfire managed for resource benefit, and wildfire (hereafter ‘treated area’) best explained patterns of burn severity in the 2022 Black Fire, outweighing the importance of fire weather and vegetation factors. A fully treated area experienced 51 % less high severity fire than an untreated area, on average, across the Black fire landscape. In a fine-scale fire progression analysis, we found that high-severity fire that encountered a previously treated area experienced a 21–55 % decrease in burn severity within 250 m of the treated area boundary. In sum, we found that previous treatments and wildfires that occurred within the Black fire perimeter were highly effective in influencing patterns of burn severity and appear to be the reason why the Black fire was restorative, and not catastrophic. Our results suggest that the severity of other large fire events can be reduced by increasing the pace and scale of treatment activities within low- and middle-elevation pine and mixed conifer forest landscapes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"580 ","pages":"Article 122540"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725000489","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In many parts of the western United States, wildfires are becoming larger and more severe, threatening the persistence of forest ecosystems. Understanding the ways in which management activities such as prescribed fire and managed wildfire can mitigate fire severity is essential for developing effective forest conservation strategies. We evaluated the effects of previous fuels reduction treatments, including prescribed fire and wildfire managed for resource benefit, and other wildfires on the burn severity of the 2022 Black Fire in southwestern New Mexico, USA. The Black Fire burned over 131,000 ha in mostly low- to middle-elevation ponderosa pine and mixed conifer forests, but burned only ∼4 % at high-severity, leading us to question what factors led to this fire burning in such an ecologically beneficial way and aligning with the natural range of variation in terms of burn severity for this region. In a landscape scale analysis, we found that areas that experienced more prescribed fire, wildfire managed for resource benefit, and wildfire (hereafter ‘treated area’) best explained patterns of burn severity in the 2022 Black Fire, outweighing the importance of fire weather and vegetation factors. A fully treated area experienced 51 % less high severity fire than an untreated area, on average, across the Black fire landscape. In a fine-scale fire progression analysis, we found that high-severity fire that encountered a previously treated area experienced a 21–55 % decrease in burn severity within 250 m of the treated area boundary. In sum, we found that previous treatments and wildfires that occurred within the Black fire perimeter were highly effective in influencing patterns of burn severity and appear to be the reason why the Black fire was restorative, and not catastrophic. Our results suggest that the severity of other large fire events can be reduced by increasing the pace and scale of treatment activities within low- and middle-elevation pine and mixed conifer forest landscapes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
规定的火灾、有管理的燃烧和以前的野火降低了美国西南部大火的严重程度
在美国西部的许多地区,野火变得越来越大,越来越严重,威胁到森林生态系统的持久性。了解规定火灾和管理野火等管理活动减轻火灾严重程度的方式,对于制定有效的森林保护战略至关重要。我们评估了以前的燃料减少处理方法的效果,包括为资源效益而管理的规定火灾和野火,以及其他野火对美国新墨西哥州西南部2022年黑色火灾的烧伤严重程度的影响。黑火在低海拔到中海拔的黄松和混合针叶林中燃烧了131,000 公顷,但在高严重程度下只燃烧了约4 %,这让我们质疑是什么因素导致了这场火灾以如此有益的生态方式燃烧,并与该地区燃烧严重程度的自然变化范围相一致。在景观尺度分析中,我们发现经历了更多规定火灾的地区,为资源效益而管理的野火和野火(以下简称“处理区域”)最好地解释了2022年黑火中烧伤严重程度的模式,超过了火灾天气和植被因素的重要性。在整个黑火景观中,完全处理过的地区经历的严重火灾比未处理过的地区平均少51% %。在精细尺度的火灾进展分析中,我们发现,遇到先前处理过的区域的高严重性火灾,在处理区域边界250 m内,烧伤严重程度降低了21 - 55% %。总之,我们发现以前的处理和发生在黑色火灾范围内的野火在影响烧伤严重程度的模式方面非常有效,这似乎是黑色火灾具有恢复性而不是灾难性的原因。我们的研究结果表明,在中低海拔松林和混交林景观中,通过增加处理活动的速度和规模可以降低其他大型火灾事件的严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.80%
发文量
665
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world. A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers. We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include: 1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests; 2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management; 3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023); 4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript. The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.
期刊最新文献
Different functional trait responses of fine roots to nitrogen deposition in angiosperm and gymnosperm woody plants Forest age and mixed mycorrhizal strategies mediate functional diversity contributions to ecosystem stability Cessation of management for Phyllostachys edulis forests exacerbates soil microbial C limitation and expands particulate and mineral-associated organic carbon pools The paradox of attraction: Why push-and-pull doesn’t always work for spruce protection against bark beetles Drought conditioning influences conifer seedling height but not survival three growing seasons after planting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1