Gavin M. Jones , Alexander Spannuth , Angela Chongpinitchai , Matthew D. Hurteau
{"title":"Prescribed fire, managed burning, and previous wildfires reduce the severity of a southwestern US gigafire","authors":"Gavin M. Jones , Alexander Spannuth , Angela Chongpinitchai , Matthew D. Hurteau","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In many parts of the western United States, wildfires are becoming larger and more severe, threatening the persistence of forest ecosystems. Understanding the ways in which management activities such as prescribed fire and managed wildfire can mitigate fire severity is essential for developing effective forest conservation strategies. We evaluated the effects of previous fuels reduction treatments, including prescribed fire and wildfire managed for resource benefit, and other wildfires on the burn severity of the 2022 Black Fire in southwestern New Mexico, USA. The Black Fire burned over 131,000 ha in mostly low- to middle-elevation ponderosa pine and mixed conifer forests, but burned only ∼4 % at high-severity, leading us to question what factors led to this fire burning in such an ecologically beneficial way and aligning with the natural range of variation in terms of burn severity for this region. In a landscape scale analysis, we found that areas that experienced more prescribed fire, wildfire managed for resource benefit, and wildfire (hereafter ‘treated area’) best explained patterns of burn severity in the 2022 Black Fire, outweighing the importance of fire weather and vegetation factors. A fully treated area experienced 51 % less high severity fire than an untreated area, on average, across the Black fire landscape. In a fine-scale fire progression analysis, we found that high-severity fire that encountered a previously treated area experienced a 21–55 % decrease in burn severity within 250 m of the treated area boundary. In sum, we found that previous treatments and wildfires that occurred within the Black fire perimeter were highly effective in influencing patterns of burn severity and appear to be the reason why the Black fire was restorative, and not catastrophic. Our results suggest that the severity of other large fire events can be reduced by increasing the pace and scale of treatment activities within low- and middle-elevation pine and mixed conifer forest landscapes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"580 ","pages":"Article 122540"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725000489","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In many parts of the western United States, wildfires are becoming larger and more severe, threatening the persistence of forest ecosystems. Understanding the ways in which management activities such as prescribed fire and managed wildfire can mitigate fire severity is essential for developing effective forest conservation strategies. We evaluated the effects of previous fuels reduction treatments, including prescribed fire and wildfire managed for resource benefit, and other wildfires on the burn severity of the 2022 Black Fire in southwestern New Mexico, USA. The Black Fire burned over 131,000 ha in mostly low- to middle-elevation ponderosa pine and mixed conifer forests, but burned only ∼4 % at high-severity, leading us to question what factors led to this fire burning in such an ecologically beneficial way and aligning with the natural range of variation in terms of burn severity for this region. In a landscape scale analysis, we found that areas that experienced more prescribed fire, wildfire managed for resource benefit, and wildfire (hereafter ‘treated area’) best explained patterns of burn severity in the 2022 Black Fire, outweighing the importance of fire weather and vegetation factors. A fully treated area experienced 51 % less high severity fire than an untreated area, on average, across the Black fire landscape. In a fine-scale fire progression analysis, we found that high-severity fire that encountered a previously treated area experienced a 21–55 % decrease in burn severity within 250 m of the treated area boundary. In sum, we found that previous treatments and wildfires that occurred within the Black fire perimeter were highly effective in influencing patterns of burn severity and appear to be the reason why the Black fire was restorative, and not catastrophic. Our results suggest that the severity of other large fire events can be reduced by increasing the pace and scale of treatment activities within low- and middle-elevation pine and mixed conifer forest landscapes.
期刊介绍:
Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world.
A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers.
We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include:
1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests;
2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management;
3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023);
4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript.
The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.