The importance of the volatile carbon fraction in estimating deadwood carbon concentrations

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Forest Ecology and Management Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-15 DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122555
Mahendra Doraisami , Sean.C. Thomas , Adam S. Gorgolewski , Adam R. Martin
{"title":"The importance of the volatile carbon fraction in estimating deadwood carbon concentrations","authors":"Mahendra Doraisami ,&nbsp;Sean.C. Thomas ,&nbsp;Adam S. Gorgolewski ,&nbsp;Adam R. Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The volatile carbon concentration or fraction (VCF) of wood—i.e., the proportion of woody tissue which is composed of heat-sensitive volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which are lost during sample preparation—is an important contributor to wood C concentrations. Studies of live wood have shown that failure to account for the VCF of wood may result in significant errors in forest C stock estimates. However, while studies have shown that deadwood C concentrations differ from those in live wood, no study has explicitly quantified the VCF in deadwood. Here, we quantify the VCF in deadwood for the first time, using <em>n</em> = 400 individual deadwood samples obtained from 13 species, multiple decay classes (DC), and two primary woody tissue types (i.e., stem wood and bark), in a temperate forest. The VCF in deadwood is non-trivial, averaging ∼0.9 % and ranging widely across species and decay classes. Across both taxonomic divisions (gymnosperms vs. angiosperms) VCF is largest (1.73 %) in DC 1 but declines to 0 % in DC 5. Overall, stem wood exhibits higher VCF (1.06 %) than bark (0.64 %). Lastly, deadwood VCF appears systematically lower than that in live wood, indicating that live wood VCFs may not be good approximators of the VCF in deadwood. Our results suggest that failing to account for the VCF of deadwood in forest C estimation studies, especially in the early stages of decay, results in errors in deadwood C stock estimates of ∼0.9 % on average. Future studies focused on tree- and forest-scale C estimation should therefore account for the VCF in their analyses, in order to improve the accuracy of C stock estimates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"581 ","pages":"Article 122555"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725000635","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The volatile carbon concentration or fraction (VCF) of wood—i.e., the proportion of woody tissue which is composed of heat-sensitive volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which are lost during sample preparation—is an important contributor to wood C concentrations. Studies of live wood have shown that failure to account for the VCF of wood may result in significant errors in forest C stock estimates. However, while studies have shown that deadwood C concentrations differ from those in live wood, no study has explicitly quantified the VCF in deadwood. Here, we quantify the VCF in deadwood for the first time, using n = 400 individual deadwood samples obtained from 13 species, multiple decay classes (DC), and two primary woody tissue types (i.e., stem wood and bark), in a temperate forest. The VCF in deadwood is non-trivial, averaging ∼0.9 % and ranging widely across species and decay classes. Across both taxonomic divisions (gymnosperms vs. angiosperms) VCF is largest (1.73 %) in DC 1 but declines to 0 % in DC 5. Overall, stem wood exhibits higher VCF (1.06 %) than bark (0.64 %). Lastly, deadwood VCF appears systematically lower than that in live wood, indicating that live wood VCFs may not be good approximators of the VCF in deadwood. Our results suggest that failing to account for the VCF of deadwood in forest C estimation studies, especially in the early stages of decay, results in errors in deadwood C stock estimates of ∼0.9 % on average. Future studies focused on tree- and forest-scale C estimation should therefore account for the VCF in their analyses, in order to improve the accuracy of C stock estimates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挥发性碳分数在估算枯木碳浓度中的重要性
木材的挥发性碳浓度或分数(VCF)。在美国,木材组织中由热敏性挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)组成的比例(在样品制备过程中损失)是木材C浓度的重要贡献者。对活木的研究表明,不考虑木材的VCF可能会导致森林C储量估计出现重大误差。然而,虽然有研究表明,枯木中的C浓度与活木中的不同,但没有研究明确量化枯木中的VCF。在这里,我们首次量化了枯木中的VCF,使用n = 400个枯木样本,这些样本来自温带森林中的13个物种,多个腐烂类别(DC)和两种主要木质组织类型(即茎木和树皮)。枯木中的VCF是非平凡的,平均为~ 0.9 %,并且在不同的物种和腐烂类别中范围广泛。在裸子植物和被子植物的两个分类中,VCF在DC 1中最大(1.73 %),在DC 5中下降到0 %。总体而言,茎材的VCF(1.06 %)高于树皮(0.64 %)。最后,枯木的VCF呈现出系统性的低于活木的VCF,这表明活木的VCF可能不是枯木VCF的良好近似值。我们的研究结果表明,在森林碳估算研究中,特别是在腐烂的早期阶段,未能考虑到枯木的VCF,会导致枯木碳储量估算的平均误差为~ 0.9 %。因此,今后着重于树木和森林尺度碳估算的研究应在其分析中考虑到VCF,以提高碳储量估算的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.80%
发文量
665
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world. A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers. We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include: 1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests; 2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management; 3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023); 4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript. The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.
期刊最新文献
Responses of understory plant diversity to fire regimes in temperate forests Effects of different stand densities and pruning on timber volume and ecosystem carbon sink in subtropical secondary forests: A Case study from Zhejiang Province, China Decoupling of overstory and understory composition in an African tropical rainforest suggests declining tree diversity Developing transfer functions for impact-abundance relationships in defoliating geometrid moths Root system architecture and uprooting resistance of Pinus thunbergii regenerated on anthropogenic embankments used as growing bases after tsunami disaster
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1